Morris V Crown - Judgment Search Results

Ravindra Kumar Vs. State Of U.p.

Court: Supreme Court of India

a loaf of bread for his hungry family. It also discussed the classic judgment of Lord Denning in Morris v. Crown Office, (1970) 2 QB114and concluded as follows:- “10… … In our opinion, we should display the same wisdom … modern approach should be to reform a person instead of branding him a criminal all his life. In [Morris v. Crown Office, (1970) 2 QB114: (1970) 2 WLR792(CA)]. , the observations made were that young people are no ordinary

Avtar Singh Vs. Union of India and Ors.

Court: Supreme Court of India

Jean Valjean was branded as a thief for whole life. This Court also referred to the decision in Morris v. Crown Office (1970) 2 QB114 Relevant portion is extracted hereunder :“8. We respectfully agree with the Delhi High Court … to their studies, to their parents and continue the good course which they have so wrongly disturbed.” (Vide Morris v. Crown Office (1970) 2 QB114at p. 125C-H. In our opinion, we should display the same wisdom as displayed by

Haridas Das Vs. Smt. Usha Rani Banik and ors. and Apu Banik

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: AIR2007SC2688; 2007(5)ALD43(SC); (SCSuppl)2007(4)CHN27; 2007(2)JKJ77[SC]; 2007(3)KLT587(SC); (2007)6MLJ274(SC); 2006MPLJ226(SC)

of court and it is enough if the action complained of is inherently likely so to interfere. In Morris v. Crown Office 1970(1) All E.R. 1079 ,Lord Denning M.R. said: that the course of justice must not be deflected

Commr.of Police and ors Vs. Sandeep Kumar

Court: Supreme Court of India

their studies, to their parents and continue the good course which they have so wrongly disturbed."[ Vide : Morris v. Crown Office, (1970) 2 Q.B. 114 ]10. In our opinion, we should display the same wisdom as displayed by

R.Ramar Vs. State Rep. by

Court: Chennai

to their studies, to their parents and continue the good course which they have so wrongly disturbed." (Vide Morris v. Crown Office, QB at p. 125C-H.) In our opinion, we should display the same wisdom as displayed by Lord

Prestige Estates Projects Limited Vs. State of Karnataka

Court: Karnataka

of court and it is enough if the action complained of is inherently likely so to interfere.20. In Morris v. Crown Office13, Lord Denning M.R. said: that the course of justice must not be deflected or interfered with. Those

The District B.C. Mahila Welfare Association Rep. by President Bangaru ...

Court: Andhra Pradesh

Reported in: 2008(2)ALD225

of Court and it is enough if the action complained of is inherently likely so to interfere. In Morris v. Crown Officer 1970 (1) All E.R. 1079 page 1081, Lord Denning M.R. said: that the course of justice must

Sharad Bansilal Vakil Vs. Suo Motu

Court: Gujarat

Reported in: (2006)2GLR1707

or disrupts court proceedings constitutes an interference with the due administration of justice, and is a contempt. In Morris V Crown Office a group of students protesting against a court order made against one of the leaders of their

Marimuthu Vs. the State Rep. by

Court: Chennai

to their studies, to their parents and continue the good course which they have so wrongly disturbed." (Vide Morris v. Crown Office, QB at p. 125C-H.) In our opinion, we should display the same wisdom as displayed by Lord

J.Alex Ponseelan Vs. 1.The Director General of Police,

Court: Chennai

relied on the view of LORD DENNING in his book ".Due Process of Law". and the decision in Morris v. Crown Office, (1970) 2 Q.B114, and observed thus : ".12. In our opinion, we should display the same wisdom