Morales V New - Judgment Search Results

Morales Vs. New York

Court: US Supreme Court

Morales v. New York - 396 U.S. 102 (1969) U.S. Supreme Court Morales v. New York, 396 U.S. 102 (1969) Morales … Morales v. New York - 396 U.S. 102 (1969) U.S. Supreme Court Morales v. New York, 396 U.S. 102 (1969) Morales v. New York No. 86 Argued November 20, 1969 Decided December 8,

Dunaway Vs. New York

Court: US Supreme Court

delivered the opinion of the Court. We decide in this case the question reserved 10 years ago in Morales v. New York, 396 U. S. 102 (1969), namely, "the question of the legality of custodial questioning on less than … and is claimed by petitioner to be at odds with Davis v. Mississippi, 394 U. S. 721 (1969)." Morales v. New York, 396 U. S. 102 , 396 U. S. 104 -105 (1969). Nevertheless, inadequacies in the record led

Brown Vs. Illinois

Court: US Supreme Court

the determination may be made. We therefore decline the suggestion of the United States, as amicus curiae, see Morales v. New York, 396 U. S. 102 (1969), to remand the case for further factual findings. We conclude that the … as amicus curiae in which he urges the Court to remand the case for further factual hearings, cf. Morales v. New York, 396 U. S. 102 (1969). I concur in the Court's rejection of this suggestion, agreeing that the

Kolasani Sivakumari and Others Vs. Kolasani Sambasiva Rao and Others

Court: Andhra Pradesh

Reported in: 2000(1)ALD750; 2000(1)ALT601; I(2001)DMC75

supra in avyavaharika. Mr. Colebrooke translates the expression 'avyavaharika' as 'any debt for a cause repugnant to good morals'. In Hemraj v. Khem Chand, (1943) 71 IA 171, the Judicial Committee held that the translation of the

Sunil Kumar Vs. State

Court: Kerala

Reported in: 1983CriLJ99

of freedom and dignity and also to ensure that childhood and youth are protected against exploitation and against moral and material abadonment. Whatever may be the laws promulgated to secure the interests and welfare of children, ultimately … child. There is no scope for sentencing the child. Sending it to the special school is with a view not to impose any term of imprisonment on the child. When the child is in the special school

M. Anjaiah Vs. Praga Tools Ltd.

Court: Andhra Pradesh

Reported in: (1987)IILLJ78AP

by the Criminal Court. In support thereof, he placed strong reliance on the decision reported in Durga Singh v. State of Punjab . The question, is therefore, whether drinking alcohol or toddy and in that drunken brawl, … the power under Clause 23(35) of the Standing Orders which defined that conviction by a Criminal Court for moral turpitude - a mis-conduct read with Clause 27 (which dispenses with enquiry and be a basis for dismissal),

Duryodhan Samal Vs. Smt. Uma Dei and ors.

Court: Orissa

Reported in: AIR1986Ori30; 60(1985)CLT360

540 (supra).16. The aforesaid conclusion finds support from various other earlier decisions vide, AIR 1943 Cal 573: Bireswar Moral v. Indu Bhushan Kundu, AIR 1959 Cal 567: Debi Dutta Moody v. T. Bellan, AIR 1966 SC 1206 … retrospective if it takes away or impairs any vested right acquired under an existing law or creates a new liability or obligation in respect of transactions already past, or creates a new obligation or liability in respect

Raghunandan Sahu and ors. Vs. Badri Teli and ors.

Court: Allahabad

Reported in: AIR1938All263

justice,' but the best rendering is perhaps-that by Colebrooke as a debt for a cause, 'repugnant to good morals'.5. The word used in the text for debt is 'rina' which literally means a loan, but it is … to 15 are subsequent transferees of the mortgaged property. It is not necessary to state in detail the various pleas taken in defence by the several defendants; it is sufficient for the purposes of the appeal and

Achmu Hengsu and Nine ors. Vs. Nemanna Kudre

Court: Chennai

Reported in: (1920)ILR43Mad319

karnavan, without allowing for the possibility that he may turn over a new leaf when he is given the responsibilities of the karanvan's office. No … the interest of the tarwad requires that the management of its affairs should not be entrusted to him.5. Moral unfitness seems to me to be an equally good reason for exclusion as mental or physical deficiencies.6. On … at the same time to declare that the next in order of seniority was unfit to hold the vacant office, and I fail to see any reason for supposing that Civil Courts have not power to grant

Nemannakudre Vs. Lchmu Hengasu and ors.

Court: Chennai

Reported in: (1919)37MLJ539

karnavan without allowing for the possibility that he may turn over a new leaf when he is given the responsibilities of the karnavan's office. No … the interest of the tarwad requires that the management of its affairs should not be entrusted to him.''5. Moral unfitness seems to me to be an equally good reason for exclusion as mental or physical deficiencies.6. On … at the same time to declare that the next in order of seniority was unfit to hold the vacant office, and I fail to see any reason for supposing that Civil Courts have no power to grant