Moo - Judgment Search Results
Meher Rohinton Moos Vs. Rohinton Framroze Moos
Court: Mumbai
Decided on: Nov-29-1976
Reported in: (1977)79BOMLR131
Lentin, J.1. The Gentlemen Delegates, who are the sole Judges of facts, have unanimously found that the defendant to the suit is guilty of desertion and that the defendant to the counter-claim is guilty of constructive...
Subramonian Moos N.S. vs the Registrar of Co-Operative Societies
Court: Kerala
Decided on: Jan-19-2023
THURSDAY, THE 19TH DAY OF JANUARY 2023 / 29TH POUSHA, 1944 WP(C) NO. 438 OF 2023 PETITIONER: SUBRAMONIAN MOOS N.S, AGED 63 YEARS S/O LATE N. SREEKUMARAN MOOS, NARAYANAMANGALAM, KIDANGOOR SOUTH P.O., KOTTAYAM, PIN - 686583 BY
N.H. Moos Vs. Abdul HusaIn Mulla Tyeballi
Court: Mumbai
Decided on: Jun-23-1925
Reported in: AIR1925Bom523; (1925)27BOMLR1147; 90Ind.Cas.600
Norman Macleod, Kt., C.J.1. This is an application in revision by Mr Moos, who was appointed Receiver by an order of the High Court for administering the estate of one Kadarbhai
18-section briefs on any result in this list
N.H. Moos Vs. the Government of Bombay
Court: Mumbai
Decided on: Jul-14-1925
Reported in: AIR1926Bom47; (1925)27BOMLR1237
v. The Government of Bombay [1912] F. A. 147 of 1911) The Government of Bombay v. N. H. Moos : (1922)24BOMLR471 and, lastly, The Government of Bombay v. Khanderao : AIR1923Bom417 .3. Really the only question in
N.H. Moos Vs. Gulamali Tyabali Soni
Court: Mumbai
Decided on: Mar-06-1929
Reported in: AIR1930Bom152; 125Ind.Cas.441
Mirza, J.1. The plaintiff as receiver in Suit No. 3012 of 1925 addressed a letter to the defendants on January 8, 1926, demanding from them a sum of Rs. 2,100 as due by the defendants to...
Ardeshir Sorabsha Moos Vs. Khushaldas Gokuldas
Court: Mumbai
Decided on: Dec-11-1907
Reported in: (1908)10BOMLR268
Batchelor, J.1. The appellant in these appeals was the original plaintiff. He sued to recover on certain bills drawn on the defendant and endorsed over to the plaintiff, the defendant having failed to pay the bills....
The Deputy Commissioner of Agricultural Income-tax and Sales Tax Vs. N ...
Court: Kerala
Decided on: Apr-11-1975
Reported in: [1975]36STC169(Ker)
V. Khalid, J.1. Although the amount of tax involved in this case is negligible, the questions of law raised are of frequent occurrence and importance.2. The questions of law raised for decision by this court are:...
Gulamali Sher Mahomed Vs. N.H. Moos
Court: Mumbai
Decided on: Aug-11-1930
Reported in: (1930)32BOMLR1315
J.W.F. Beaumont, C.J.1. This appeal, which is an appeal from a decision of Mr. Justice Blackwell given in chambers in which he merely followed the previous decision of Mr. Justice Mirza in Durgaduti v. Bholaram :...
The Government of Bombay Vs. N.H. Moos
Court: Mumbai
Decided on: Mar-31-1922
Reported in: (1922)24BOMLR471
what I may call a quarrying basis, that is to say, the total cubic contents of stone and Moorum were calculated and a particular value was given to them, written back according to the period estimated to
Motor Emporium Company Vs. N.H. Moos
Court: Mumbai
Decided on: Mar-04-1927
Reported in: AIR1927Bom606; (1927)29BOMLR1446
Talyarkhan, J.1. An important question under the Indian Companies Act has been raised in this liquidation as regards the right of the Crown in a winding up to payment of its debt in priority to all...
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- Next ›
- Last »
Hover bars for counts · use +/− or drag to zoom · click a bar to filter by year
AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free