Monetary - Judgment Search Results
Home > Cases Phrase: monetary Year: 2016 Page 1 of about 301 results (0.045 seconds)Munwa Devi Vs. Central Coalfields Ltd Through Its Chairman Cum Managin ...
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Jan-28-2016
..... it further appears that the petitioner refused to accept the monetary benefit and filed a representation for giving employment to ..... since the ccl management has already issued order for providing monetary benefit to the petitioner therefore her representation for providing ..... 45 years then she has option either to accept the monetary compensation or employment learned counsel submits that it is .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTCommissioner of Income-tax, Bombay City -I Vs. Sunny Sounds (P.) Ltd.
Court: Mumbai
Decided on: Jan-08-2016
..... of financedepartment of revenuecentral board direct taxesnew delhi the 10th december 2015 subject revision of monetary limits for filing of appeals by the department before income tax appellate tribunal and high ..... reference is invited to board s instruction no 5 2014 dated 10 07 2014 wherein monetary limits and other conditions for filing departmental appeals in income tax matters before appellate .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTSecurities and Exchange Board of India Vs. Kishore R.Ajmera
Court: Supreme Court of India
Decided on: Feb-23-2016
..... rajesh n jhaveri and m s rajendra jayantilal shah second category monetary penalty has been imposed for indulging in manipulative trading under ..... the said basis it is submitted that a lesser penalty of monetary compensation would be justified 30 we disagree with the above ..... contention the stage at which the monetary penalty was imposed on the two other brokers indulging in .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTAnil Chandra Mohanti Vs. Human Resources Department
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Dec-13-2016
..... of rs 5500 9000 w e f 01 01 2006 but the monetary benefits was given from 01 04 2007 the petitioner superannuated from ..... of rs 5500 9000 w e f 01 01 2006 but the monetary benefits was given from 01 04 2007 the petitioner superannuated from ..... the ground of audit objection even otherwise under the common rule governing monetary issues no recovery process is permissible after lapse of 3 years learned .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTPramod Kumar Vs. Education
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Dec-13-2016
..... of rs 5500 9000 w e f 01 01 2006 but the monetary benefits was given from 01 04 2007 the petitioner superannuated from ..... of rs 5500 9000 w e f 01 01 2006 but the monetary benefits was given from 01 04 2007 the petitioner superannuated from ..... the ground of audit objection even otherwise under the common rule governing monetary issues no recovery process is permissible after lapse of 3 years learned .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTDoman Soren Vs. Human Resources Department
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Dec-13-2016
..... of rs 5500 9000 w e f 01 01 2006 but the monetary benefits was given from 01 04 2007 the petitioner superannuated from ..... of rs 5500 9000 w e f 01 01 2006 but the monetary benefits was given from 01 04 2007 the petitioner superannuated from ..... the ground of audit objection even otherwise under the common rule governing monetary issues no recovery process is permissible after lapse of 3 years learned .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTGangadhar Pati Vs. Human Resources Department
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Dec-13-2016
..... of rs 5500 9000 w e f 01 01 2006 but the monetary benefits was given from 01 04 2007 the petitioner superannuated from ..... of rs 5500 9000 w e f 01 01 2006 but the monetary benefits was given from 01 04 2007 the petitioner superannuated from ..... the ground of audit objection even otherwise under the common rule governing monetary issues no recovery process is permissible after lapse of 3 years learned .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTSwapan Kumar Mandal Vs. Human Resources Department
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Dec-13-2016
..... of rs 5500 9000 w e f 01 01 2006 but the monetary benefits was given from 01 04 2007 the petitioner superannuated from ..... of rs 5500 9000 w e f 01 01 2006 but the monetary benefits was given from 01 04 2007 the petitioner superannuated from ..... the ground of audit objection even otherwise under the common rule governing monetary issues no recovery process is permissible after lapse of 3 years learned .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTKaliya Ganjan Nanda Vs. Human Resources Department
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Dec-13-2016
..... of rs 5500 9000 w e f 01 01 2006 but the monetary benefits was given from 01 04 2007 the petitioner superannuated from ..... of rs 5500 9000 w e f 01 01 2006 but the monetary benefits was given from 01 04 2007 the petitioner superannuated from ..... the ground of audit objection even otherwise under the common rule governing monetary issues no recovery process is permissible after lapse of 3 years learned .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTGopal Pandey Vs. Human Resources Department
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Dec-13-2016
..... of rs 5500 9000 w e f 01 01 2006 but the monetary benefits was given from 01 04 2007 the petitioner superannuated from ..... of rs 5500 9000 w e f 01 01 2006 but the monetary benefits was given from 01 04 2007 the petitioner superannuated from ..... the ground of audit objection even otherwise under the common rule governing monetary issues no recovery process is permissible after lapse of 3 years learned .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT- << Prev.
- Next >>
Sign-up to get more results
Unlock complete result pages and premium legal research features.
Start Free Trial