Skip to content


Monetary - Judgment Search Results

Home > Cases Phrase: monetary Year: 2002 Page 1 of about 300 results (0.027 seconds)
Sep 17 2002 (TRI)

income Tax Officer Vs. Roopchand Jain

Court: Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Nagpur

Decided on: Sep-17-2002

Reported in: (2003)79TTJ(Nag.)406

..... learned departmental representative that interest amount has also to be considered for working out the monetary limit of the departmental appeal cannot be accepted he also pointed out that the department ..... the individual case should be taken into account for the purpose of the monetary limit while applying the monetary limits the effect of carry forward effect of consequential addition deletions in .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Dec 18 2002 (TRI)

P.i. Chandrasekharan Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and anr.

Court: Central Administrative Tribunal CAT Ernakulam

Decided on: Dec-18-2002

Reported in: (2004)(2)SLJ342CAT

..... post on 24 10 1995 and therefore he is entitled for monetary benefits on his promotion to the post of deputy station ..... promotion and such promotion was unjustly denied is entitled to get monetary benefits 12 in the conspectus of the facts and circumstances we ..... direct the respondents to grant all benefits including the monetary benefits w e f 6 2 95 and consequential pensionary .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Oct 11 2002 (TRI)

Kensigton Investment Ltd. Vs. Securities and Exchange Board of India

Court: SEBI Securities and Exchange Board of India or Securities Appellate Tribunal SAT

Decided on: Oct-11-2002

..... appeals are directed against the four separate orders made by the adjudicating officer imposing monetary penalty on the appellants holding them guilty of violating certain reporting requirements under regulation ..... specific procedural requirements enumerated in section 15a to 15h need not be penalised with monetary penalties 20 he further submitted that the adjudicating officer has not followed the .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jan 04 2002 (TRI)

Escorts Mutual Fund Vs. P. Sri Sai Ram, Adjudicating

Court: SEBI Securities and Exchange Board of India or Securities Appellate Tribunal SAT

Decided on: Jan-04-2002

..... certain sections in the act including section 15a the adjudicating officer is empowered to impose monetary penalty upto the limit prescribed in the concerned sections on being satisfied after inquiry that ..... hon ble supreme court in hindustan steel case the decision of the adjudicating officer imposing monetary penalty on the appellant is not tenable therefore the impugned order cannot survive and .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Mar 15 2002 (HC)

Delhi Financial Corporation Vs. Shri Harish Chander Gulati

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Mar-15-2002

Reported in: 2002VAD(Delhi)256; [2004]120CompCas223(Delhi); 97(2002)DLT577; 2002(62)DRJ705; [2004]55SCL11(Delhi)

..... which is capable of being valued in terms of monetary gain or prevention of monetary loss by recovery of the outstanding claim of ..... following observations the claim of the corporation is not the monetary claim to be investigated though it may become necessary to ..... relief capable of being valued in terms of monetary gain or prevention of monetary loss the form of the application the nature .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Aug 19 2002 (HC)

Jansukhlal Chhaganlal Nagori Vs. Regional Manager, Union Bank of India

Court: Gujarat

Decided on: Aug-19-2002

Reported in: (2003)1GLR614; (2003)IILLJ451Guj

..... and ultimately these reckless acts of the petitioner resulted into substantial monetary loss to the bank the petitioner s say is that though ..... the ground that the respondent bank was likely to suffer some monetary loss on account of petitioner s negligence in the matter ..... loan 6 orders negligence likely to involve the bank in serious monetary loss 3 1 the statement of allegations indicate that the .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jul 02 2002 (HC)

Aditya Cement Staff Club Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court: Rajasthan

Decided on: Jul-02-2002

Reported in: RLW2004(1)Raj396; 2003(4)WLC663

..... has been substituted with new mode an method of determining monetary value of specified perquisites scheme under the parent act to ..... all benefits or amenities not provided for by way of monetary payment exceeds fifty thousand rupees provided that nothing contained in ..... only to provide the method or mode of quantifying its monetary value has been left to be detailed by subordinate legislation .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Oct 28 2002 (HC)

Samadhan Pandit Nagre and anr. Vs. State of Maharashtra and anr.

Court: Mumbai

Decided on: Oct-28-2002

Reported in: (2003)1BOMLR485; I(2003)DMC594; 2003(2)MhLj386

..... free in appropriate cases the court has jurisdiction to compensate the victim by awarding suitable monetary compensation 17 in the case of k umapathy cited supra the petitioner was illegally ..... the andhra pradesh high court under article 226 of the constitution ofindia for grant of monetary compensation for contravention of fundamental rights the division bench of the andhra pradesh high court .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Aug 27 2002 (HC)

Tamil Nadu Corporation for Development of Women Co-operative Industria ...

Court: Chennai

Decided on: Aug-27-2002

Reported in: [2003(96)FLR503]; (2002)IIILLJ988Mad

..... sub section 2 can be made applicable both to the non monetary and monetary benefits it is open to the labour court to interpret ..... of the industrial disputes act is not confined merely to non monetary benefits which could be converted in terms of money but it ..... claim arose under the said scheme or because the benefit was monetary or because it involved any substantial question between the company and .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jan 15 2002 (HC)

Union of India (Uoi) and ors. Vs. Brindaban Mallick and ors.

Court: Kolkata

Decided on: Jan-15-2002

Reported in: (2002)2CALLT47(HC)

..... applicants in o a no 357 of 1988 were given the monetary benefit of the revised scale of pay not with effect from ..... october 1981 but on a notional basis the applicant was allowed monetary benefits of such refutation only from the month of april 1990 ..... notional effect from 16th october 1981 and with actual effect with full monetary benefits from the date of the application made before the learned .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

  • << Prev.

Sign-up to get more results

Unlock complete result pages and premium legal research features.

Start Free Trial

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //