Monetary - Judgment Search Results
Home > Cases Phrase: monetary Year: 2003 Page 1 of about 300 results (0.04 seconds)Sundaram Finance Ltd., Wheels Vs. Securities and Exchange Board of Ind ...
Court: SEBI Securities and Exchange Board of India or Securities Appellate Tribunal SAT
Decided on: Jan-29-2003
Reported in: (2003)3CompLJ145SAT
..... after enquiry confirmed the failure and imposed one lakh rupees as monetary penalty on the appellants the order passed by the adjudicating ..... counsel submitted that the order of the adjudicating officer imposing monetary penalty on the appellants is contrary to the decision of ..... inquiry the adjudicating officer penalised the company by imposing a monetary penalty of rs 1 21 500 vide his order dated .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTMaharashtra State Road Transport Corporation Vs. Premlal S/O. Khatri G ...
Court: Mumbai
Decided on: Apr-25-2003
Reported in: 2003(3)ALLMR1022; 2004(2)BomCR338; (2003)IILLJ1108Bom; 2003(3)MhLj1025
..... the first two meetings of the negotiating committee and the non monetary demands were to be discussed and settled by the joint committee ..... as per the requirement of the said clause 49 though the monetary benefit due and payable to the respondents consequent to grant of ..... the terms of the settlement in relation to the grant of monetary facility relating to the service conditions of the employees 24 the .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTSundaram Finance Ltd. Vs. Securities and Exchange Board of India
Court: SEBI Securities and Exchange Board of India or Securities Appellate Tribunal SAT
Decided on: Jan-01-2003
Reported in: (2003)42SCL521SAT
..... after enquiry confirmed the failure and imposed one lakh rupees as monetary penalty on the appellants the order passed by the adjudicating ..... counsel submitted that the order of the adjudicating officer imposing monetary penalty on the appellants is contrary to the decision of ..... inquiry the adjudicating officer penalised the company by imposing a monetary penalty of rs 1 21 500 vide his order dated .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTZee Telefilms Ltd. Vs. the Adjudicating and Enquiry
Court: SEBI Securities and Exchange Board of India or Securities Appellate Tribunal SAT
Decided on: Jan-29-2003
Reported in: (2003)2CompLJ282SAT
..... acquisition of shares and takeovers regulations 1997 the 1997 regulations and the consequential imposition of monetary penalty is under challenge in the present appeal 2 the securities and exchange board of ..... benefit of the scheme the adjudication by the adjudicating officer for the purpose of imposing monetary penalty is a quasi judicial function and on passing the final order in adjudication the .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTZee Telefilms Ltd. Vs. Adjudicating and Enquiry Officer,
Court: SEBI Securities and Exchange Board of India or Securities Appellate Tribunal SAT
Decided on: Jan-01-2003
Reported in: (2003)42SCL484SAT
..... acquisition of shares and takeovers regulations 1997 the 1997 regulations and the consequential imposition of monetary penalty is under challenge in the present appeal 2 the securities and exchange board of ..... benefit of the scheme the adjudication by the adjudicating officer for the purpose of imposing monetary penalty is a quasi judicial function and on passing the final order in adjudication the .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTVmc Software Ltd., Sanjay Doshi, Vs. Securities and Exchange Board of ...
Court: SEBI Securities and Exchange Board of India or Securities Appellate Tribunal SAT
Decided on: Jan-29-2003
..... further the prosecution proceedings involve considerable time and even if concluded in conviction the penalty monetary or otherwise may be very nominal in view of the above sebi has decided to ..... benefit of the scheme the adjudication by the adjudicating officer for the purpose of imposing monetary penalty is a quasi judicial function and on passing the final order in adjudication the adjudicating .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTDoogar and Associates Ltd. Vs. Securities and Exchange Board of India
Court: SEBI Securities and Exchange Board of India or Securities Appellate Tribunal SAT
Decided on: Sep-30-2003
Reported in: (2003)48SCL115SAT
..... facts and circumstances of the case the alleged failure did not warrant imposition of monetary penalty 9 shri vinay chauhan learned representative of the respondent submitted that for the ..... directly concerning him cannot be viewed lightly and the adjudicating officer s decision imposing monetary penalty on the appellant cannot be considered as unwarranted 18 learned representative submitted that .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTV.M.C. Software Ltd. Vs. Securities and Exchange Board of India
Court: SEBI Securities and Exchange Board of India or Securities Appellate Tribunal SAT
Decided on: Jan-01-2003
Reported in: (2003)42SCL473SAT
..... further the prosecution proceedings involve considerable time and even if concluded in conviction the penalty monetary or otherwise may be very nominal in view of the above sebi has decided to ..... benefit of the scheme the adjudication by the adjudicating officer for the purpose of imposing monetary penalty is a quasi judicial function and on passing the final order in adjudication the adjudicating .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTBharat Overseas Bank Ltd. Represented by Its General Manager Vs. the D ...
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Dec-02-2003
Reported in: 2003(4)CTC641
..... charge sheet f there was no allegation against the second respondent that he gained any monetary benefits from those two constituents g the second respondent has only exercised his discretionary ..... nikunja bihari patnaik to contend that irrespective of the allegation of mis appropriation or unlawful monetary gain the very conduct of the second respondent in acting beyond his authority itself would .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTAditya Cement Staff Club and Birla White Staff Club Vs. Union of India ...
Court: Rajasthan
Decided on: Jul-02-2003
Reported in: (2003)182CTR(Raj)554; [2004]266ITR70(Raj)
..... impugned notification rule 3 prescribing method and mode of determining monetary value of specified perquisites not received in cash has been ..... substituted with new mode and method of determining monetary value of specified perquisites scheme under the patent act to ..... only to provide the method or mode of quantifying its monetary value has been left to be detailed by subordinate legislation .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT- << Prev.
- Next >>
Sign-up to get more results
Unlock complete result pages and premium legal research features.
Start Free Trial