Skip to content


Monetary - Judgment Search Results

Home > Cases Phrase: monetary Year: 2003 Page 1 of about 300 results (0.04 seconds)
Jan 29 2003 (TRI)

Sundaram Finance Ltd., Wheels Vs. Securities and Exchange Board of Ind ...

Court: SEBI Securities and Exchange Board of India or Securities Appellate Tribunal SAT

Decided on: Jan-29-2003

Reported in: (2003)3CompLJ145SAT

..... after enquiry confirmed the failure and imposed one lakh rupees as monetary penalty on the appellants the order passed by the adjudicating ..... counsel submitted that the order of the adjudicating officer imposing monetary penalty on the appellants is contrary to the decision of ..... inquiry the adjudicating officer penalised the company by imposing a monetary penalty of rs 1 21 500 vide his order dated .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Apr 25 2003 (HC)

Maharashtra State Road Transport Corporation Vs. Premlal S/O. Khatri G ...

Court: Mumbai

Decided on: Apr-25-2003

Reported in: 2003(3)ALLMR1022; 2004(2)BomCR338; (2003)IILLJ1108Bom; 2003(3)MhLj1025

..... the first two meetings of the negotiating committee and the non monetary demands were to be discussed and settled by the joint committee ..... as per the requirement of the said clause 49 though the monetary benefit due and payable to the respondents consequent to grant of ..... the terms of the settlement in relation to the grant of monetary facility relating to the service conditions of the employees 24 the .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jan 01 2003 (TRI)

Sundaram Finance Ltd. Vs. Securities and Exchange Board of India

Court: SEBI Securities and Exchange Board of India or Securities Appellate Tribunal SAT

Decided on: Jan-01-2003

Reported in: (2003)42SCL521SAT

..... after enquiry confirmed the failure and imposed one lakh rupees as monetary penalty on the appellants the order passed by the adjudicating ..... counsel submitted that the order of the adjudicating officer imposing monetary penalty on the appellants is contrary to the decision of ..... inquiry the adjudicating officer penalised the company by imposing a monetary penalty of rs 1 21 500 vide his order dated .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jan 29 2003 (TRI)

Zee Telefilms Ltd. Vs. the Adjudicating and Enquiry

Court: SEBI Securities and Exchange Board of India or Securities Appellate Tribunal SAT

Decided on: Jan-29-2003

Reported in: (2003)2CompLJ282SAT

..... acquisition of shares and takeovers regulations 1997 the 1997 regulations and the consequential imposition of monetary penalty is under challenge in the present appeal 2 the securities and exchange board of ..... benefit of the scheme the adjudication by the adjudicating officer for the purpose of imposing monetary penalty is a quasi judicial function and on passing the final order in adjudication the .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jan 01 2003 (TRI)

Zee Telefilms Ltd. Vs. Adjudicating and Enquiry Officer,

Court: SEBI Securities and Exchange Board of India or Securities Appellate Tribunal SAT

Decided on: Jan-01-2003

Reported in: (2003)42SCL484SAT

..... acquisition of shares and takeovers regulations 1997 the 1997 regulations and the consequential imposition of monetary penalty is under challenge in the present appeal 2 the securities and exchange board of ..... benefit of the scheme the adjudication by the adjudicating officer for the purpose of imposing monetary penalty is a quasi judicial function and on passing the final order in adjudication the .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jan 29 2003 (TRI)

Vmc Software Ltd., Sanjay Doshi, Vs. Securities and Exchange Board of ...

Court: SEBI Securities and Exchange Board of India or Securities Appellate Tribunal SAT

Decided on: Jan-29-2003

..... further the prosecution proceedings involve considerable time and even if concluded in conviction the penalty monetary or otherwise may be very nominal in view of the above sebi has decided to ..... benefit of the scheme the adjudication by the adjudicating officer for the purpose of imposing monetary penalty is a quasi judicial function and on passing the final order in adjudication the adjudicating .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Sep 30 2003 (TRI)

Doogar and Associates Ltd. Vs. Securities and Exchange Board of India

Court: SEBI Securities and Exchange Board of India or Securities Appellate Tribunal SAT

Decided on: Sep-30-2003

Reported in: (2003)48SCL115SAT

..... facts and circumstances of the case the alleged failure did not warrant imposition of monetary penalty 9 shri vinay chauhan learned representative of the respondent submitted that for the ..... directly concerning him cannot be viewed lightly and the adjudicating officer s decision imposing monetary penalty on the appellant cannot be considered as unwarranted 18 learned representative submitted that .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jan 01 2003 (TRI)

V.M.C. Software Ltd. Vs. Securities and Exchange Board of India

Court: SEBI Securities and Exchange Board of India or Securities Appellate Tribunal SAT

Decided on: Jan-01-2003

Reported in: (2003)42SCL473SAT

..... further the prosecution proceedings involve considerable time and even if concluded in conviction the penalty monetary or otherwise may be very nominal in view of the above sebi has decided to ..... benefit of the scheme the adjudication by the adjudicating officer for the purpose of imposing monetary penalty is a quasi judicial function and on passing the final order in adjudication the adjudicating .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Dec 02 2003 (HC)

Bharat Overseas Bank Ltd. Represented by Its General Manager Vs. the D ...

Court: Chennai

Decided on: Dec-02-2003

Reported in: 2003(4)CTC641

..... charge sheet f there was no allegation against the second respondent that he gained any monetary benefits from those two constituents g the second respondent has only exercised his discretionary ..... nikunja bihari patnaik to contend that irrespective of the allegation of mis appropriation or unlawful monetary gain the very conduct of the second respondent in acting beyond his authority itself would .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jul 02 2003 (HC)

Aditya Cement Staff Club and Birla White Staff Club Vs. Union of India ...

Court: Rajasthan

Decided on: Jul-02-2003

Reported in: (2003)182CTR(Raj)554; [2004]266ITR70(Raj)

..... impugned notification rule 3 prescribing method and mode of determining monetary value of specified perquisites not received in cash has been ..... substituted with new mode and method of determining monetary value of specified perquisites scheme under the patent act to ..... only to provide the method or mode of quantifying its monetary value has been left to be detailed by subordinate legislation .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

  • << Prev.

Sign-up to get more results

Unlock complete result pages and premium legal research features.

Start Free Trial

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //