Monarchism - Judgment Search Results

M/S. Monarch Infrastructure (P) Ltd. Vs. Commissioner, Ulhasnagar Muni ...

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: AIR2000SC2272; JT2000(6)SC491; 2000(4)SCALE446; (2000)5SCC287; [2000] 3 SCR 1159

Infrastructure (P) Ltd., appellant in Civil Appeal arising out of S .L.P. (c) No. 6717-18 of 2000, M/s. Monarch Infrastructure (P) Ltd., appellant in Civil Appeal arising out of 6298 of 2000 and respondent No. 3, M/s.

Monarch Gold Mining Company Ltd. Vs. Hindustan Copper Ltd.

Court: Kolkata

GA NO.269 OF 201.AP NO.568 OF 201.IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA Ordinary Original Civil Jurisdiction ORIGINAL SIDE MONARCH GOLD MINING COMPANY LTD.Versus HINDUSTAN COPPER LTD.BEFORE: The Hon'ble JUSTICE SANJIB BANERJEE Date :26. h February, 2013. Appearance:

M/S.Monarch India Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Ashirbad Food Products Pvt. Ltd.

Court: Kolkata

ORDER SHEET ACO452014 APOT1302014 CP4482013 IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA Civil Appellate Jurisdiction ORIGINAL SIDE M/S.MONARCH INDIA PVT.LTD.Versus ASHIRBAD FOOD PRODUCTS PVT.LTD.BEFORE: The Hon'ble JUSTICE ASHIM KUMAR BANERJEE The Hon'ble JUSTICE ARIJIT BANERJEE Date :...

M/S. Monarch India Pvt Ltd Vs. Ashirbad Food Products Pvt Ltd.

Court: Kolkata

1 ORDER SHEET APO No.111 of 2014 CP No.448 of 2013 IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA Civil Appellate Jurisdiction ORIGINAL SIDE M/S.MONARCH INDIA PVT LTD Versus ASHIRBAD FOOD PRODUCTS PVT LTD.BEFORE: The Hon'ble JUSTICE BANERJEE...

Monarch Gold Mining Company Ltd. Vs. Hindustan Copper Ltd.

Court: Kolkata

The Court :- Instead of taking up the stay petition by consent of the parties the stay petition is treated as appeal and the same is taken up for hearing. This appeal is directed against an...

M/S.Monarch Erectors Pvt.Ltd. Vs. Bhiwandi Nizampur City Municipal Cor ...

Court: Mumbai

1. This appeal is preferred by M/s.Monarch Erectors Pvt.Ltd., hereinafter referred to as the claimant, challenging the judgment and order dated 16.04.2008 passed by the learned Single Judge in Arbitration Petition No.202 of 2007. That Arbitration...

M/S. Monarch Infrastructure Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Ulhas Nagar Municipal Corpor ...

Court: Mumbai

P.C. 1 Heard learned Counsel for the parties. 2 Rule. Rule made returnable forthwith, by consent. Mr.Kumbhakoni, learned Counsel waives notice for respondent No.1. Mr.Dhakephalkar, learned Senior Counsel wavies notice on behalf of respondent No.2. By...

Monarch Investments St. Thomas Road, Trichur and ors. Vs. State of Ker ...

Court: Kerala

Reported in: AIR1989Ker177

Bhaskaran Nambiyar, J.1. The provisions of the Kerala Money Lenders Act are in challenge in this batch of writ appeals and writ petitions. A learned single Judge rejected the claim and dismissed the writ petitions. Hence...

Monarch (i) Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of C. Excise

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Calcutta

1. Heard Shri K.K. Banerjee, learned Advocate for the appellant-company and Shri A. Raha, learned S.D.R. for the Revenue.2. Shri Banerjee, learned Advocate for the appellant-company, submits that the Joint Commissioner of Central Excise (Technical), Kolkata-I...

Monarch Pipes Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT

Reported in: (2006)(106)ECC61

1. The appellant is required to pre-deposit duty amount of Rs. 19,33,239/- and penalty of Rs. 25,77,712/-. The learned Counsel submits that the duty has arisen on the allegation of clandestine removal. He submits that the...