Modifier - Judgment Search Results
Home > Cases Phrase: modifier Year: 1992 Page 1 of about 1,528 results (0.024 seconds)Rufo Vs. Inmates of Suffolk County Jail
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided on: Jan-15-1992
reflected in the 1985 modification since petitioners acquiesced in that modification they cannot now be heard to argue that pre 1985
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTA. Shanmugha Mudaliar and ors. Vs. P.V. Rajagopal (Died) and ors.
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jan-20-1992
Reported in: (1992)2MLJ416
..... right to the plaintiff s family had been deleted in the modified scheme of the deputy commissioner and therefore the present suit has ..... the persons having interest in the affairs of the temple before modifying the scheme factually also the court below found that there were ..... commissioner in the present case did not have the power to modify the original scheme is special pleading by the court below .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTB.R. Mulani Vs. Dr. A.B. Aswathanarayana and Others
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Apr-01-1992
Reported in: AIR1993Kant257; 1992(3)KarLJ207
portion found in between the latters ground floor plan after modification second phase and ground floor plan first phase from balepet
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTMadhya Pradesh State Road Transport Corporation Vs. the State Transpor ...
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Oct-15-1992
Reported in: AIR1993MP95; 1993(0)MPLJ193
as the question involved is whether the approval of the modified schemes by the state government under section 102 of the
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTNutan J. Patel Vs. S.V. Prasad and ors.
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Jul-01-1992
Reported in: 1993CriLJ989
..... government or by that state government the power to revoke or modify may be exercised by the central government in other words where ..... government or the state government the order can be revoked or modified by the central government 10 for the purpose of compliance ..... cofeposa act specifies the authorities who are entitled to revoke or modify the order of detention it does not confer any independent .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTMadhya Pradesh State Road Transport Corporation Vs. Secretary, State T ...
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Feb-18-1992
Reported in: 1992(0)MPLJ744
..... said notification a large number of approved schemes including the relevant scheme no 67 were modified and that the modification authorised under section 102 of the act contemplated also previous approval ..... possible to accept shri nigudkar s contention in our view the exemption contemplated under the modified scheme refers to overlapping and not to inter section indeed in the scheme itself it .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTNirmalendu Sekhar Karmakar and ors. Vs. the Basumati Corporation Ltd. ...
Court: Kolkata
Decided on: Jun-09-1992
Reported in: (1992)2CALLT194(HC)
..... of the writ petitions and the illegality of the impugned order modifying and virtually discharging the interim order even when the appeal is ..... was no interim order in operation which could in law be modified or discharged and therefore the present appeals against any such ..... the appeals and set aside the order of the learned judge modifying or discharging his earlier order staying the operation of the .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTindra Sawhney Etc. Etc Vs. Union of India and Others, Etc. Etc.
Court: Supreme Court of India
Decided on: Nov-16-1992
Reported in: AIR1993SC477; [1992]Supp2SCR454; 1992DGLS(soft)768:1992Supp(3)SCC217
..... in the first half of 1991 another office memorandum was issued on 25th september 1991 modifying the earlier memorandum dated 13th august 1990 the later momorandum reads as follows office ..... from hindu stock the large scale conversions that have been going on for centuries have modified indian caste society thus traditional hindu communaland connubial rituals and emphasis on inherited social status .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTThe Managing Director, Thanthai Periyar Transport Corporation Ltd. Vs. ...
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Oct-01-1992
Reported in: (1993)1MLJ587
..... the award in m co p no 17 of 86 will therefore stand modified as indicated earlier 13 in cross objection no 119 of 1992 in c ..... award of the tribunal in m co p no 55 of 1986 will stand modified in that the claimant therein will be entitled to recover compensation in a ..... tribunal in m co p nos 55 and 54 of 1986 will stand modified as indicated earlier there will be however no order as to costs either .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTManaging Director, Thanthai Periyar Transport Corporation Ltd. Vs. Sel ...
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Oct-01-1992
Reported in: 1994ACJ118
..... the award in m c o p no 17 of 1986 will therefore stand modified as indicated earlier 13 in cross objection no 119 of 1992 in c ..... of the tribunal in m c o p no 55 of 1986 will stand modified in that the claimant therein will be entitled to recover compensation in a sum ..... tribunal in m c o p nos 55 and 54 of 1986 will stand modified as indicated earlier there will however be no order as to costs either .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT- << Prev.
- Next >>
Sign-up to get more results
Unlock complete result pages and premium legal research features.
Start Free Trial