Modifier - Judgment Search Results

Mci Telecommunications Corp. Vs. American Telephone and Telegraph Co.

Court: US Supreme Court

might be good english to say that the french revolution modified the status of the french nobility but only because there

Chowgule and Co. (Hind) P. Ltd. Vs. Collector of C. Excise

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Reported in: (1995)LC24Tri(Delhi)

..... appeals bombay and the collector of central excise appeals bombay decided that the product rosin modified formaldehyde resin could not be eligible for concessional rate of duty under exemption notification ..... resins manufactured by reacting any of the phenols with an aldehyde and includes chemically modified phenolic resins and liquid phenolic resins but does not include blends of the phenolic .....

United States Vs. X-citement Video, Inc.

Court: US Supreme Court

..... most natural grammatical reading adopted by the ninth circuit suggests that the term knowingly modifies only the surrounding verbs transports ships receives distributes or reproduces under this construction ..... the word knowingly would not modify the elements of the minority of the performers or the sexually explicit nature .....

Jay Laxmi Salt Works (P) Ltd. Vs. State of Gujarat

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: 1994ACJ902; (1995)1GLR818; JT1994(3)SC492; (1995)109PLR1; 1994(2)SCALE797; (1994)4SCC1; [1994]3SCR866

..... cultivators supra and observed that the rule of strict liability as modified by this court entitled the appellant to successfully claim damages 5 ..... the high court therefore that the rule of strict liability was modified by this court in modern cultivators supra does not appear to ..... further the rule in rylands v fletcher supra has not been modified by our court in modem cultivators supra and the article .....

U.P Awas Evam Vikas Parishad Vs. Gyan Devi (Dead) by L.Rs. and Another ...

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: AIR1995SC724; 1994(4)SCALE755a; (1995)2SCC326; [1994]Supp4SCR646

..... an express provision in section 20 of l a act as modified by land acquisition mysore extention amendment act 1961 providing for ..... land proposed to be acquired shall have the effect of correspondingly modifying the notification under sub section 1 of section 4 and declaration ..... the l a act except to the extent it has been modified by the schedule proceedings under section 28 and notification under .....

U.P. Awas Evam Vikas Parishad and ors. Vs. Rajendra Bahadur Srivastava ...

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: JT1994(7)SC304; (1996)IILLJ679SC; 1995Supp(4)SCC76

..... an express provision in section 20 of l a act as modified by land acquisition mysore extension amendment act 1961 providing for ..... land proposed to be acquired shall have the effect of correspondingly modifying the notification under sub section 1 of section 4 and the ..... the l a act except to the extent it has been modified by the schedule proceedings under section 28 and notification under section .....

Shakti Raj Films Distributors Vs. Commissioner of Income-tax

Court: Mumbai

Reported in: (1995)124CTR(Bom)243; [1995]213ITR20(Bom)

..... dated december 5 1974 the central board of direct taxes had modified the instructions contained in its earlier circular of october 4 1969 ..... contention of the revenue is that the above circular having been modified twice during the pendency of the assessment and the circular on ..... of the assessment the permission so given by it has been modified and or withdrawn 12 this legal position was accepted by the .....

Kishinchand Chellarams (India) (P) Limited and anr. Vs. G. Varadappa

Court: Chennai

Reported in: (1995)1MLJ135

..... is one without jurisdiction the order of the learned judge which modifies the final order passed by bellie j is not maintainable learned ..... of the constitution of india the court has got discretion to modify any interim order passed pending final disposal of the civil revision ..... law on which the same was founded had been reversed or modified by subsequent decision of supreme court would be liable to be .....

Kamleshkumar Ishwardas Patel Vs. Union of India and Others

Court: Mumbai

Reported in: 1995(43)BLJR295; 1995(2)BomCR640; 1994CriLJ3105; 1994(2)MhLj1669

have been empowered to exercise the power of revocation or modification are the state government and the central government but section

Municipal Employees Congress Vs. State of Gujarat and ors.

Court: Gujarat

Reported in: (1994)2GLR1279

..... as follows no resolution passed by the corporation shall be modified or cancelled within three months after the passing thereof except ..... setting forth fully the resolution which it is proposed to modify or cancel at such meeting and the motion or proposition ..... such resolution in view of the aforesaid provision corporation could have modified or cancelled its resolution even within a period of three .....