Misrepresentation - Year 2003 - Judgments

Apr 05 2003 (HC)

Shri Dinesh Mahadev Parmar Vs. Mr. M.N. Singh, Commissioner of Police,

Court: Mumbai

Decided on: Apr-05-2003

Reported in: 2003BomCR(Cri)915

d g deshpande j 1 heard mr tripathi the learned counselfor the petitioner detenue and the learned a p p...

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Apr 04 2003 (HC)

Shri Vilas Siddhu Jadhav Vs. Shri M.N. Singh, Commissioner of Police,

Court: Mumbai

Decided on: Apr-04-2003

Reported in: 2003BomCR(Cri)929; 2003CriLJ3501

d g deshpande j 1 heard mr tripathi for the petitioner detenu and mr b r patil acting p p...

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jul 25 2003 (HC)

Subhash Projects and Marketing Limited Vs. JaIn Farms and Resorts Ltd. ...

Court: Karnataka

Decided on: Jul-25-2003

Reported in: ILR2003KAR4343

..... by its construction at instance of 3rd respondent licence was suspended on allegation of misrepresentation held section 188 of the karnataka municipalities act 1964 for short the act provides ..... is accorded if satisfied that such sanction was accorded in consequence of any material misrepresentation or fraudulent statement contained in the notice given or information furnished under section 187 .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Sep 01 2003 (HC)

Motisham Mohammed Ismail Vs. Central Bureau of Investigation

Court: Karnataka

Decided on: Sep-01-2003

Reported in: 2003CriLJ4763; ILR2003KAR4059; 2003(6)KarLJ375

..... section 82 ram mohan reddy j transfer of permit petitioners allegations of fraud and misrepresentation against 2nd respondent who obtained a transfer of petitioners permit in revision karnataka state ..... appellate tribunal recorded a finding that there is no material to establish fraud or misrepresentation since petitioners admitted on form 52 for transfer of permit and dismissed revision petition .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jun 02 2003 (HC)

Jahansaheb MuslhuddIn Dundge Vs. SadroddIn Imamsaheb Pinnitod and ors.

Court: Karnataka

Decided on: Jun-02-2003

Reported in: AIR2003Kant496; 2003(6)KarLJ55

..... benefit of wage increase to its employees including the petitioners petitioners have not made any misrepresentations and there is no fraud on the part f the petitioners subsequently notice of ..... the petitioners herein have not secured the benefit of higher wages either by fraud or misrepresentation the respondent has voluntarily extended the benefit of increased wages on the recommendation of .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Aug 25 2003 (SC)

Satya Ranjan Majhi and anr. Vs. State of Orissa and ors.

Court: Supreme Court of India

Decided on: Aug-25-2003

Reported in: 2003(6)ALT6(SC); (2004)97CALLT1(SC); 97(2004)CLT1(SC); JT2003(8)SC286; 2003(6)SCALE800; (2003)7SCC439

..... sirpurkar jj wrong promotion recovery of excess amount circumstances deserving lenient view no fraud or misrepresentation on employees part time bound promotion of appellant who was a class iv employee ..... illiterate person who did not understand implication of the undertaking there was no fraud or misrepresentation on his part and part of the amount had already been recovered further recovery .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Aug 04 2003 (HC)

S.A. Mukund Vs. Sri Ganapathi Urban Co-operative Bank Limited and anr.

Court: Karnataka

Decided on: Aug-04-2003

Reported in: IV(2004)BC595; [2004]121CompCas447(Kar); 2003(6)KarLJ60

..... benefit of wage increase to its employees including the petitioners petitioners have not made any misrepresentations and there is no fraud on the part f the petitioners subsequently notice of ..... the petitioners herein have not secured the benefit of higher wages either by fraud or misrepresentation the respondent has voluntarily extended the benefit of increased wages on the recommendation of .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jan 10 2003 (TRI)

Lucky Exports Vs. Commissioner of Customs

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT

Decided on: Jan-10-2003

Reported in: (2003)(153)ELT589Tri(Bang.)

..... the licensing authority and that licence had been obtained on the basis of such misrepresentation the misrepresentation alleged is that in their application they had indicated that they would use ..... not the stand of the department that action is being initiated for misdeclaration or misrepresentation to the licensing authority the transaction is confined only to contravention of the exemption .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Dec 16 2003 (TRI)

Gaur Impex Vs. Commissioner of Customs

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Tamil Nadu

Decided on: Dec-16-2003

Reported in: (2004)(94)ECC45

..... the customs authorities cannot refuse exemption on an allegation that there was misrepresentation if there was any misrepresentation it was for the licensing authority to take steps in that ..... a situation where the quantity based advance licence having been obtained by fraud and misrepresentation and which was cancelled with retrospective effect and the appellant having no manufacturing facilities .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jul 04 2003 (HC)

Lambadi Pedda Bhadru and ors. Vs. Mohd. Ali HussaIn and ors.

Court: Andhra Pradesh

Decided on: Jul-04-2003

Reported in: 2003(4)ALD673; 2003(4)ALT611

..... there is no mention of any allegation of fraud or misrepresentation against any individual there is neither any allegation nor finding ..... enable the government to plead and establish the fraud and misrepresentation tide disputes in proceedings under article 226 of the constitution ..... our opinion with regard to various allegations of fraud and misrepresentation since they can always be gone into by the .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Misrepresentation - Judgment Search Results