Misrepresentation - Judgment Search Results
Home > Cases Phrase: misrepresentation Year: 2002 Page 1 of about 300 results (0.015 seconds)Arjundev Khemchand Dureja an Indian Inhabitant Vs. the State of Mahara ...
Court: Mumbai
Decided on: Sep-12-2002
Reported in: 2003BomCR(Cri)534
d g deshpande j 1 petitioner is the father of the detenu detenuis detained under cofeposa order of detention is...
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTThe St. Anne's Education Society and Anr. Vs. State of Karnataka and O ...
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Jul-26-2002
Reported in: ILR2002KAR4096; 2002(5)KarLJ563
..... i section 82 ram mohan reddy j transfer of permit petitioners allegations of fraud and misrepresentation against 2nd respondent who obtained a transfer of petitioners permit in revision karnataka state ..... appellate tribunal recorded a finding that there is no material to establish fraud or misrepresentation since petitioners admitted on form 52 for transfer of permit and dismissed revision petition .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTSmt. Varija Achar and ors. Vs. K. Balakrishna Rao
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: May-31-2002
Reported in: 2003(1)KarLJ221
..... by its construction at instance of 3rd respondent licence was suspended on allegation of misrepresentation held section 188 of the karnataka municipalities act 1964 for short the act provides ..... is accorded if satisfied that such sanction was accorded in consequence of any material misrepresentation or fraudulent statement contained in the notice given or information furnished under section 187 .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTThe Commissioner of Income Tax Vs. Textool Co. Ltd.
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Dec-03-2002
Reported in: (2004)186CTR(Mad)501
..... director comes to know that contrary to the scheme of the act or due to misrepresentation or fraud played a patta had been granted to a person under the relevant provisions ..... director comes to know that contrary to the scheme of the act or due to misrepresentation or fraud played a patta had been granted to a person under the relevant provisions .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTTamil Nadu Brick Industries, Rep. by Its Partner, N.S. Kothandapani Vs ...
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Dec-20-2002
Reported in: 2003(1)CTC345; (2003)1MLJ265
..... director comes to know that contrary to the scheme of the act or due to misrepresentation or fraud played a patta had been granted to a person under the relevant provisions ..... director comes to know that contrary to the scheme of the act or due to misrepresentation or fraud played a patta had been granted to a person under the relevant provisions .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTSri Chakara Finance, Rep. by Its Managing Partner G. Kesavan Vs. K. Se ...
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Nov-25-2002
Reported in: 2003(1)CTC85
..... director comes to know that contrary to the scheme of the act or due to misrepresentation or fraud played a patta had been granted to a person under the relevant provisions ..... director comes to know that contrary to the scheme of the act or due to misrepresentation or fraud played a patta had been granted to a person under the relevant provisions .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTCommissioner of Income-tax Vs. Bharat Overseas Bank Ltd.
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Aug-27-2002
Reported in: [2002]2002ITR573(Mad)
..... director comes to know that contrary to the scheme of the act or due to misrepresentation or fraud played a patta had been granted to a person under the relevant provisions ..... director comes to know that contrary to the scheme of the act or due to misrepresentation or fraud played a patta had been granted to a person under the relevant provisions .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTF. Ghouse Muhiddeen Vs. the Government of India and anr.
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Apr-30-2002
Reported in: AIR2002Mad470
..... director comes to know that contrary to the scheme of the act or due to misrepresentation or fraud played a patta had been granted to a person under the relevant provisions ..... director comes to know that contrary to the scheme of the act or due to misrepresentation or fraud played a patta had been granted to a person under the relevant provisions .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTState Express Transport Corporation, Tamil Nadu Division-ii, Represent ...
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Dec-19-2002
Reported in: 2004ACJ1279
..... director comes to know that contrary to the scheme of the act or due to misrepresentation or fraud played a patta had been granted to a person under the relevant provisions ..... director comes to know that contrary to the scheme of the act or due to misrepresentation or fraud played a patta had been granted to a person under the relevant provisions .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTM. Shahul Hameed Vs. A. Salima,
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Nov-22-2002
Reported in: II(2003)DMC262
..... director comes to know that contrary to the scheme of the act or due to misrepresentation or fraud played a patta had been granted to a person under the relevant provisions ..... director comes to know that contrary to the scheme of the act or due to misrepresentation or fraud played a patta had been granted to a person under the relevant provisions .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT- << Prev.
- Next >>
Sign-up to get more results
Unlock complete result pages and premium legal research features.
Start Free Trial