Misrepresentation - Judgment Search Results
Home > Cases Phrase: misrepresentation Year: 2000 Page 1 of about 168 results (0.012 seconds)Vijay Damaji Gaidhane Vs. State of Maharashtra and anr.
Court: Mumbai
Decided on: Sep-05-2000
Reported in: 2001ALLMR(Cri)965; (2001)3BOMLR126; 2001(1)MhLj159
r k batta j 1 the petitioner has been detained under the maharashtra prevention of dangerous activities of slumlords bootleggers...
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTBhaskaranand Alias Babulley Vs. District Magistrate, Mirzapur and Othe ...
Court: Allahabad
Decided on: Mar-15-2000
Reported in: 2000(2)AWC1627; 2000CriLJ3362
s r singh j 1 focal point of attack in the present petition is on the validity of incessant detention...
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTH.M. Muninarayana Vs. Chief Electoral Officer in Karnataka and Others
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Aug-23-2000
Reported in: AIR2001Kant14; ILR2000KAR3319; 2000(6)KarLJ388
..... benefit of wage increase to its employees including the petitioners petitioners have not made any misrepresentations and there is no fraud on the part f the petitioners subsequently notice of ..... the petitioners herein have not secured the benefit of higher wages either by fraud or misrepresentation the respondent has voluntarily extended the benefit of increased wages on the recommendation of .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTSpecial Land Acquisition Officer, Karnataka Industrial Areas Developme ...
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Jul-12-2000
Reported in: ILR2000KAR3527; 2000(6)KarLJ381
..... benefit of wage increase to its employees including the petitioners petitioners have not made any misrepresentations and there is no fraud on the part f the petitioners subsequently notice of ..... the petitioners herein have not secured the benefit of higher wages either by fraud or misrepresentation the respondent has voluntarily extended the benefit of increased wages on the recommendation of .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTVadivelu Vs. Sundaram and ors.
Court: Supreme Court of India
Decided on: Oct-10-2000
Reported in: AIR2000SC3230; 2000(4)CTC302; 2000(6)SCALE719; (2000)8SCC355; [2000]Supp3SCR642
..... sirpurkar jj wrong promotion recovery of excess amount circumstances deserving lenient view no fraud or misrepresentation on employees part time bound promotion of appellant who was a class iv employee ..... illiterate person who did not understand implication of the undertaking there was no fraud or misrepresentation on his part and part of the amount had already been recovered further recovery .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTBasavaraj R. Patil and Others Vs. State of Karnataka and Others
Court: Supreme Court of India
Decided on: Oct-11-2000
Reported in: AIR2000SC3214; 2000(2)ALD(Cri)843; 2001(1)ALT(Cri)40; 2000CriLJ4604; 2000(6)SCALE697; (2000)8SCC740; [2000]Supp3SCR658
..... sirpurkar jj wrong promotion recovery of excess amount circumstances deserving lenient view no fraud or misrepresentation on employees part time bound promotion of appellant who was a class iv employee ..... illiterate person who did not understand implication of the undertaking there was no fraud or misrepresentation on his part and part of the amount had already been recovered further recovery .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTThe Bangalore Development Authority, Bangalore Vs. Akkallappa (Dead) b ...
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Mar-24-2000
Reported in: 2000(6)KarLJ374
..... benefit of wage increase to its employees including the petitioners petitioners have not made any misrepresentations and there is no fraud on the part f the petitioners subsequently notice of ..... the petitioners herein have not secured the benefit of higher wages either by fraud or misrepresentation the respondent has voluntarily extended the benefit of increased wages on the recommendation of .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTSmt. Debaki Naik Vs. State of Orissa and anr.
Court: Orissa
Decided on: Feb-04-2000
Reported in: 2000(I)OLR386
..... automatically vacated l c rs be sent back forthwith to the respective courts criminal fact misrepresentation of petitioners lodged two f i r s one with station house officer and other .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTLaxmidhar Mahalik and ors. Vs. State of Orissa and ors.
Court: Orissa
Decided on: Jan-21-2000
Reported in: 89(2000)CLT316; 2000(I)OLR226
..... petitioner no 3 for permission under section 22 of act permission not granted but on misrepresentation being made that permission had in fact been granted registered sale deed was executed in .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTThe Town Panchayat, Harapanahalli, Davanagere District Vs. State of Ka ...
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Mar-21-2000
Reported in: ILR2000KAR1947; 2000(4)KarLJ232
..... the parties and which is binding and if it is not covered with any fraud misrepresentation concealment then the industrial dispute does not exist further held no doubt courts are slow .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT- << Prev.
- Next >>
Sign-up to get more results
Unlock complete result pages and premium legal research features.
Start Free Trial