Skip to content


Misdirection - Judgment Search Results

Home > Cases Phrase: misdirection Year: 2003 Page 1 of about 173 results (0.008 seconds)
Oct 28 2003 (HC)

Dharwad Zilla Panchayat and ors. Vs. Fairokhan A.

Court: Karnataka

Decided on: Oct-28-2003

Reported in: 2004(2)KarLJ210; (2004)IILLJ466Kant

..... harmful and injurious to the petitioner vis vis bodily injury this is how it has misdirected itself in approaching the issue of cruelty hence the impugned judgment has to be interfered .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Oct 22 2003 (HC)

P.R. Radhakrishna Setty and Sons Company Vs. A.N. Satish Babu

Court: Karnataka

Decided on: Oct-22-2003

Reported in: 2004(2)KarLJ223

..... harmful and injurious to the petitioner vis vis bodily injury this is how it has misdirected itself in approaching the issue of cruelty hence the impugned judgment has to be interfered .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Nov 24 2003 (HC)

A. Ahalyamma Vs. State of Karnataka and ors.

Court: Karnataka

Decided on: Nov-24-2003

Reported in: 2004(2)KarLJ221

..... harmful and injurious to the petitioner vis vis bodily injury this is how it has misdirected itself in approaching the issue of cruelty hence the impugned judgment has to be interfered .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Nov 17 2003 (HC)

Smt. Devamma Vs. A.R. Raghu

Court: Karnataka

Decided on: Nov-17-2003

Reported in: III(2004)BC167; [2004]121CompCas322(Kar); 2004CriLJ1357; ILR2004KAR1099; 2004(2)KarLJ244

..... harmful and injurious to the petitioner vis vis bodily injury this is how it has misdirected itself in approaching the issue of cruelty hence the impugned judgment has to be interfered .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jul 28 2003 (HC)

Smt. Narasamma Vs. the Karnataka Industrial Area Development Board and ...

Court: Karnataka

Decided on: Jul-28-2003

Reported in: 2003(6)KarLJ299

..... being governed by the contract qua contract the tribunal without examining the policy by totally misdirecting itself has erroneously passed the award by invoking section 140 of the act be it .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

May 26 2003 (HC)

Doddabasappa Basappa Belavigi Vs. Gadigeppa Veerappa Nelogal (Deceased ...

Court: Karnataka

Decided on: May-26-2003

Reported in: ILR2003KAR2987; 2004(2)KarLJ251

..... in terms of the said compromise will have to be drawn the court below has misdirected itself in understanding the effect and purport of the provision accordingly he brought suit but .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jun 30 2003 (HC)

State of Karnataka, by Karnataka Lokayuktha Vs. T.R. Krishnamurthy, Ps ...

Court: Karnataka

Decided on: Jun-30-2003

Reported in: 2003CriLJ3977; ILR2003KAR2980

..... in terms of the said compromise will have to be drawn the court below has misdirected itself in understanding the effect and purport of the provision

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jun 06 2003 (HC)

Kishan Ramchandra Kumbhar and ors. Vs. Dr. Kashinath Bandu Teli,

Court: Mumbai

Decided on: Jun-06-2003

Reported in: 2003(3)ALLMR817; 2003(5)BomCR31; 2004(1)MhLj285

..... in recording the finding that the suit land was not an agricultural land is completely misdirected and has caused miscarriage of justice to the petitioners similarly he contends that the finding ..... that the petitioners were not tenants is also misdirected and is against the settled legal position it is therefore submitted that although the present .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Dec 23 2003 (HC)

Suniti Bala Debnath Vs. Lal Parshi Debi and ors.

Court: Kolkata

Decided on: Dec-23-2003

Reported in: (2004)2CALLT352(HC)

..... of materials on record having i ignored evidence on record ii misdirected themselves in the matter of legal principles and wrongly cast ..... supra it has been observed that if the courts below misdirected themselves in the matter of legal principles then the high ..... possession and the learned appellate court below erred in law and misdirected itself in the matter of legal principle and found ramkishan .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Apr 25 2003 (TRI)

B.E. Billimoria and Co. Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Customs and Cent ...

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai

Decided on: Apr-25-2003

..... this case is wrong he stated that the adjudicating authority has misdirected himself inasmuch as he has wrongly appreciated the extent and ..... contractor and the employer krcl in our view the department has misdirected itself in issuing the show cause notice on these terms ..... krcl not in the way in which the adjudicating authority has misdirected himself solicitors for krcl by their reply to show cause .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

  • << Prev.

Sign-up to get more results

Unlock complete result pages and premium legal research features.

Start Free Trial

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //