Misdirection - Year 2000 - Judgments

Mar 20 2000 (HC)

Karnataka State Road Transport Corporation Staff and Workers' Federati ...

Court: Karnataka

Decided on: Mar-20-2000

Reported in: 2000(4)KarLJ370

..... in terms of the said compromise will have to be drawn the court below has misdirected itself in understanding the effect and purport of the provision in 1972 ksrtc framed the .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Mar 21 2000 (HC)

SavIn Kumar Shetty Vs. Vittal Anchan and Others

Court: Karnataka

Decided on: Mar-21-2000

Reported in: ILR2000KAR2150; 2000(4)KarLJ395

..... in terms of the said compromise will have to be drawn the court below has misdirected itself in understanding the effect and purport of the provision as notified under the notification .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Sep 19 2000 (HC)

The Executive Engineer, Zilla Parishad Engineering Sub-division and an ...

Court: Karnataka

Decided on: Sep-19-2000

Reported in: AIR2001Kant53

..... being governed by the contract qua contract the tribunal without examining the policy by totally misdirecting itself has erroneously passed the award by invoking section 140 of the act be it .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jun 09 2000 (HC)

V.K. Shivananda Vs. the Regional Transport Officer, Davanagere

Court: Karnataka

Decided on: Jun-09-2000

Reported in: 2001(4)KarLJ636

..... in terms of the said compromise will have to be drawn the court below has misdirected itself in understanding the effect and purport of the provision

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Nov 10 2000 (HC)

P.D. Chiyanna Vs. Karnataka Agro Industries Corporation Limited, Banga ...

Court: Karnataka

Decided on: Nov-10-2000

Reported in: [2001(88)FLR814]; ILR2001KAR483; 2001(4)KarLJ632; (2001)ILLJ967Kant

..... in terms of the said compromise will have to be drawn the court below has misdirected itself in understanding the effect and purport of the provision

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Dec 05 2000 (HC)

Shantiniketan Society and anr. Vs. State and ors.

Court: Kolkata

Decided on: Dec-05-2000

Reported in: (2001)1CALLT231(HC),2001(1)CHN259

..... itself within the bounds of rigours of judicial review but also misdirected itself in law by posing a wrong question according to ..... glossory and not following the judgment of this court amounts to misdirection in law 5 it has relied upon the quashed proceedings ..... a discretion on the basis of any other incorrect legal principles misdirection as to the burden of proof and wrongful admission or exclusion .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Sep 29 2000 (HC)

Sankaran E.R. Vs. Mettur Government Servants Co-operative Stores Ltd. ...

Court: Chennai

Decided on: Sep-29-2000

Reported in: (2000)IIILLJ91Mad

..... who found the proceedings of the second respondent appellate authority suffer with illegality material misdirections and error apparent on the face of the records had ultimately allowed the writ ..... the valid conclusion that the proceedings of the second respondent suffered with illegality material misdirections and error apparent on the face of the records consequently quashing the proceedings of .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Sep 13 2000 (HC)

Shikshan Mandal, Throuhg Its General Secretary and anr. Vs. Presiding ...

Court: Mumbai

Decided on: Sep-13-2000

Reported in: 2001(3)BomCR558

..... the rival submissions i find that the tribunal has completely misdirected itself in proceeding on the assumption as reflected in para ..... condition no 11 in the agreement is totally misconceived and misdirected besides this what is relevant to note is that admittedly ..... the impugned order in my view the tribunal has completely misdirected itself in not considering the aforesaid relevant aspects of the .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Mar 31 2000 (HC)

Annathai Vs. Murugaiah

Court: Chennai

Decided on: Mar-31-2000

Reported in: AIR2000Mad356; 2000(2)CTC698; I(2001)DMC104; (2000)IIMLJ294

..... following substantial questions of law 1 whether the lower appellate court erred in law and misdirected itself in holding that the marriage between the petitioner and the respondent was not established ..... the hindu marriage act 1955 2 whether the lower appellate court erred in law and misdirected itself in holding that the marriage between the petitioner and the respondent was not proved .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jun 07 2000 (TRI)

Moorco (India) Ltd. Vs. State of Tamil Nadu

Court: Sales Tax Tribunal STT Tamil Nadu

Decided on: Jun-07-2000

Reported in: (2000)120STC388Tribunal

..... the valve is fitted with the pipe line which may be connected to the machinery misdirected itself in stating that the valve is an accessory to machinery the conclusion of the ..... revenue that the safety valve was a tool of the machinery though the appellate tribunal misdirected itself in giving such a finding safety valves are independent items of goods to support .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Misdirection - Judgment Search Results