Misdirection - Judgment Search Results

Bibi Rahmani Khatoon and ors. Vs. Harkoo Gope and ors.

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: AIR1981SC1450; 1981(1)SCALE739; (1981)3SCC173; [1981]3SCR553; 1981(13)LC572(SC)

..... with the law of dismissals and the plain and proper criteria are not to be misdirected by terminological cover ups or by appeal to psychic processes but must be grounded on .....

Commissioner of Income-tax Vs. J.J.H. Industries (P.) Ltd.

Court: Kolkata

Reported in: [1983]139ITR928(Cal)

..... the assessee s income assessable for the assessment year 1963 64 2 whether the tribunal misdirected itself in law in completely ignoring or overlooking the material evidence on record and ..... relevant time was doing mainly name lending business it was further submitted that the tribunal misdirected itself in holding that the creditor did substantial business and was assessed at substantial amount .....

Ridgway Vs. Ridgway

Court: US Supreme Court

..... s 670 in this case by way of contrast sergeant ridgway misdirected property over which he had exclusive control in doing so of ..... his wife of her interest in community property sergeant ridgway merely misdirected property over which he had exclusive control emphasis added ante at ..... or free he had no interest whatever in the policies to misdirect to his new wife unless contrary to those decisions the act .....

Pujarla Venkaiah Vs. District Magistrate, Nalgonda and anr.

Court: Andhra Pradesh

Reported in: 1981CriLJ1534

..... radical youth league and raithu cooli sangham in nalgonda in 1979 80 and instigated and misdirected the peasants and agricultural labourers to revolt against the land owners causing dislocation to ..... be said to be prejudicial to public peace the allegation that the detenu instigated and misdirected the peasants and agricultural labourers to revolt against the land owners causing dislocation to .....

Syed Ahamed Mohideen and ors. and Syed Badruzsamman and anr. Vs. Moham ...

Court: Chennai

Reported in: (1982)2MLJ203

..... the plaintiffs themselves can have no independent right to claim the courts below have completely misdirected themselves when appreciating the pleadings as a matter of fact the plaint itself categorically ..... contention is somewhat misconceived what i am pointing out is the courts below have completely misdirected themselves with regard to two aspects namely 1 as if the plaintiffs had independent .....

Commissioner of Income-tax Vs. Orient Paper Mills Ltd.

Court: Kolkata

Reported in: (1981)23CTR(Cal)180,[1983]139ITR763(Cal)

..... itself 2 whether on the facts and in the circumstances of the case the tribunal misdirected itself in law in holding that the sum of rs 8 623 being cash allowance ..... cit v kanan devan hills produce co ltd 1979 119itr431 cal the tribunal did not misdirect itself in law in holding that the sum of rs 8 623 being cash allowance .....

Harjas Rai Vs. Commissioner of Income-tax and anr.

Court: Punjab and Haryana

Reported in: (1982)26CTR(P& H)51; [1982]138ITR77(P& H)

..... notice under section 139 2 or under section 148 of the act the commissioner had misdirected himself in law when he held that the specific knowledge with the ito that the ..... a division bench of the gujarat high court held headnote firstly that the commissioner completely misdirected himself in law in reading into section 18 2a the condition that the assessee had .....

Commissioner of Income-tax Vs. Indian Express (Madurai) Ltd.

Court: Chennai

Reported in: [1983]141ITR583(Mad)

..... we thus reject the tribunal s conclusion as based on a misdirection in law or rather on a multiplicity of misdirections 18 learned counsel for the assessee referred to a few decisions .....

Rajnikant Jeshingbhai Shath and ors. Vs. Rameshchandra Kantilal Bhatt ...

Court: Gujarat

Reported in: AIR1982Guj85; (1982)1GLR71

..... of the said principle to the facts of the present case both the courts below misdirected themselves in the exercise of their jurisdiction under s 11 read with s 28 of ..... additional floors have been superimposed on an existing building at intervals both the courts below misdirected themselves in the exercise of their jurisdiction by totally omitting to apply the correct principle .....

M. Basheer Ahmad and ors. Vs. R. Govindarajulu

Court: Chennai

Reported in: (1982)2MLJ307

..... because of the number of rulings of this court therefore where the tribunal had completely misdirected it would warrant interference in revision in opposition to this mr m n rangachari learned .....