Misconduct - Year 1934 - Judgments

Oct 16 1934 (PC)

Muthusami Chettiar and anr. Vs. K.M. Chinna Muthusami Moopanar

Court: Chennai

Decided on: Oct-16-1934

Reported in: 156Ind.Cas.430

..... on the basis of conduct which let to the conviction or on pure questions of misconduct did not amount to double jeopardy since the concept of acquittal is an acquittal is ..... on the basis of conduct which let to the conviction or on pure questions of misconduct did not amount to double jeopardy since the concept of acquittal is an acquittal is .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Nov 09 1934 (PC)

Subbarama Iyer Vs. Chinnasami Thanjirayar and ors.

Court: Chennai

Decided on: Nov-09-1934

Reported in: 156Ind.Cas.492

..... on the basis of conduct which let to the conviction or on pure questions of misconduct did not amount to double jeopardy since the concept of acquittal is an acquittal is ..... on the basis of conduct which let to the conviction or on pure questions of misconduct did not amount to double jeopardy since the concept of acquittal is an acquittal is .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Oct 12 1934 (PC)

S. Krishnasamy Ayyar Vs. Rava Ramanathan

Court: Chennai

Decided on: Oct-12-1934

Reported in: AIR1935Mad314; 156Ind.Cas.418

..... on the basis of conduct which let to the conviction or on pure questions of misconduct did not amount to double jeopardy since the concept of acquittal is an acquittal is ..... on the basis of conduct which let to the conviction or on pure questions of misconduct did not amount to double jeopardy since the concept of acquittal is an acquittal is .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Oct 26 1934 (PC)

Mowlavi Haji Muhammad Abdul Baqi Vs. Kanuru Sundararamayya and ors.

Court: Chennai

Decided on: Oct-26-1934

Reported in: 156Ind.Cas.408

..... on the basis of conduct which let to the conviction or on pure questions of misconduct did not amount to double jeopardy since the concept of acquittal is an acquittal is ..... on the basis of conduct which let to the conviction or on pure questions of misconduct did not amount to double jeopardy since the concept of acquittal is an acquittal is .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Oct 04 1934 (PC)

Swamy Kotayya Vs. Thunuguntla Venkata Rangarao

Court: Chennai

Decided on: Oct-04-1934

Reported in: 156Ind.Cas.428

..... on the basis of conduct which let to the conviction or on pure questions of misconduct did not amount to double jeopardy since the concept of acquittal is an acquittal is ..... on the basis of conduct which let to the conviction or on pure questions of misconduct did not amount to double jeopardy since the concept of acquittal is an acquittal is .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Oct 20 1934 (PC)

Veerappa Chettiar Vs. S.A. Ar. M. Annamalai Chettiar and ors.

Court: Chennai

Decided on: Oct-20-1934

Reported in: AIR1935Mad316; 156Ind.Cas.439

..... on the basis of conduct which let to the conviction or on pure questions of misconduct did not amount to double jeopardy since the concept of acquittal is an acquittal is ..... on the basis of conduct which let to the conviction or on pure questions of misconduct did not amount to double jeopardy since the concept of acquittal is an acquittal is .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Oct 19 1934 (PC)

In Re: Mahomed Haji Haroon Kadwani

Court: Mumbai

Decided on: Oct-19-1934

Reported in: AIR1935Bom254; (1935)37BOMLR396

..... should be given preference in appointment as trustees but they are liable to removal for misconduct arid they should be careful to give not the least ground for suspicion that the .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Aug 20 1934 (PC)

Mannilal Anandji Vs. B.N. Ry. Ltd.

Court: Kolkata

Decided on: Aug-20-1934

Reported in: AIR1935Cal271a,155Ind.Cas.1052

..... the railway administration liable for loss destruction deterioration or damage only if the plaintiff proved misconduct on the part of the railway administration s servants for the consignment booked from ..... a general statement that the railway company s servants had been guilty of negligence and misconduct no particulars being given the defendant company ought to have asked for particulars about .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jul 30 1934 (PC)

In Re: an Advocate

Court: Kolkata

Decided on: Jul-30-1934

Reported in: AIR1935Cal484,157Ind.Cas.374

..... charges that is to say the charges of professional misconduct and gross misconduct presumably however they were disposing of those charges by ..... high court whom it finds guilty of professional or other misconduct the question which we have to determine therefore is ..... learned chief justice said thatnegligence by itself is not professional misconduct into that offence there must enter the element of moral .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jun 06 1934 (PC)

Madras and Southern Mahratta Railway Co. Ltd. Vs. Haji Latif Abdullah

Court: Kolkata

Decided on: Jun-06-1934

Reported in: AIR1935Cal809,159Ind.Cas.886

..... between chakodi and tadipolli the question is whether the damage was caused by the misconduct of the railway administration the learned trial judge found that the railway administration was ..... guilty of misconduct inasmuch as the railway servant had without justification detained the consignment for 23 hours .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Misconduct - Judgment Search Results