Ministerially - Judgment Search Results

MCD Ministerial Staff Association (Regd.) and Others Vs. The Director, ...

Court: Delhi

to be noticed for disposal of the present writ petition, are that petitioner no.1 is an Association of Ministerial Staff of Corporations and petitioners no.2 and 4 are directly affected person. 5. As per the petition, petitioners

Uttar Pradesh Ministerial Collectorate Karamchari Sangh Vs. State of U ...

Court: Allahabad

Reported in: [2004(102)FLR518]; (2004)2UPLBEC2080

J. 1. Heard the learned Counsel for the appellant.2. The petitioner claims to be a recognized association of Ministerial Employees, of Collectorate of U.P. and feels aggrieved by the judgment and order of the learned Single Judge

Hc(Ministerial) Kunwar Pal Singh Vs. Union of India and ors.

Court: Delhi

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) No. 2667/2012 Date of decision:23. d April, 2013 % HC(MINISTERIAL) KUNWAR PAL SINGH ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. Ashutosh Rana, Adv. versus UNION OF INDIA...

State of Bihar and ors. Vs. Secretariat Press Ministerial Staff Union ...

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: AIR2002SC2145; 2002(2)BLJR1110; [2002(93)FLR977]; [2002(2)JCR170(SC)]; JT2002(4)SC439; 2002LabIC1711; 2002(4)SCALE153; (2002)9SCC68; 2002(2)SCT1015(SC); (2002)2UPLBEC1655

P. Venkatarama Reddi, J. 1. Respondents 1 and 2 namely Secretariat Press Ministerial Staff Union and Government Stationery Staff Union filed a Writ petition with a prayer to issue a writ

State of U.P. and ors. Vs. Ministerial Karamchari Sangh

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: AIR1997SC4280; JT1997(8)SC415; 1997(6)SCALE388; (1998)1SCC422; [1997]Supp4SCR484; 1997(2)LC780(SC); (1997)3UPLBEC2126

the writ petition. Aggrieved by that, the present appeal is filed by special leave. 3. Before 1-4-1965, the ministerial employees of the Directorate of Information and U.P. Secretariat were in the same pay scales because there was

State of U.P. and Another Vs. Roadways Ministerial Staff Association, ...

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: AIR1996SC3415; [1996(74)FLR1883]; JT1996(6)SC208; 1996LabIC2060; 1996(5)SCALE18; (1996)9SCC479; [1996]Supp2SCR565; 1996(3)SLJ79(SC); (1996)3UPLBEC1741

1. Leave granted.2. We have heard counsel on both sides.3. The respondent-Association filed Writ Petition No. 3273/82 in the High Court of Allahabad, Lucknow Bench seeking to declare Rule 8(ii) of the U.P. State Roadways Organisation...

State of Maharashtra Vs. Ministerial Service Association

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: AIR1966SC625; (1966)IILLJ132SC; 1966MhLJ366; [1966]2SCR134

in the High Court was originally filled by two of these respondents as Secretary and Member of the Ministerial Services Associations, Wardha and Bhandara respectively but they were treated as petitions on their personal behalf. The petitioners

Saddam Alias Saddam Hussain vs Chief Ministerial Officer (Cmo)

Court: Karnataka Dharwad

accused No.5 to fraudulently claim compensation. Consequently, the claim petitions were dismissed, and the MACT directed the Chief Ministerial Officer (CMO) to lodge a complaint under Section 340 of the Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 (Cr.P.C.). The CMO

Dr Abdul Malagi S/O. Aminsab Malagi vs Chief Ministerial Officer (Cmo)

Court: Karnataka Dharwad

accused No.5 to fraudulently claim compensation. Consequently, the claim petitions were dismissed, and the MACT directed the Chief Ministerial Officer (CMO) to lodge a complaint under Section 340 of the Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 (Cr.P.C.). The CMO

Sunder Lal Vs. Rehabilitaton Ministery Employees Co-operative House Bu ...

Court: Delhi

Reported in: 42(1990)DLT82

V.B. Bansal, J.(1) The short question for consideration in this writ petition is about the correctness of the decision of the Rehabilitation Ministry Employees Cooperative House Building Society Limited (hereinafter to be referred to as the...