Skip to content
How to use Narrow results with filters
  1. Run a keyword search first to load the results page.
  2. Select Supreme Court, a High Court, or tribunal on the left.
  3. Optionally filter by decision year to focus on recent or historical cases.

Minimum Wages - Judgment Search Results

Pulse this search Log in to save a LexPulse alert for this search

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Jan 27 2005

W.B. Minimum Wages Inspectors Association and ors. Vs. State of West B ...

Court: Kolkata

Decided on: Jan-27-2005

Reported in: 2006(1)CHN404,2005(3)ESC1905

Matched in: Parties W.B. Minimum Wages Inspectors Association and ors. Vs. State of West Bengal and ors.


Mar 15 2010

State of West Bengal and anr. Vs. West Bengal Minimum Wages Inspectors ...

Court: Supreme Court of India

Decided on: Mar-15-2010

Reported in: 2010(2)SCALE45

question involved in this appeal by special leave is whether the respondents, holding the post of Inspector Agricultural Minimum Wages (for short, `Inspector - AMW'), were entitled to parity in pay scale, from April 1981, with those holding … Scale No. 9 (300-600). They were subsequently absorbed into regular service and appointed against permanent vacancies. Though Inspectors (Minimum Wages), Inspector (Trade Unions), Labour Inspectors, Supervisor (Labour Welfare), Investigators, Inspectors (Shops & Establishments) also in Pay Scale No.


Dec 07 1998

Prerna Sahygo Vs. Authority Under Minimum Wages and ors.

Court: Supreme Court of India

Decided on: Dec-07-1998

Reported in: (2001)9SCC247

respondent on the special leave petition was restricted to the compensation that was awarded.3. The Authority under the Minimum Wages Act found that the appellant had not paid minimum wages to the five workmen named in its order. … compensation that was awarded.3. The Authority under the Minimum Wages Act found that the appellant had not paid minimum wages to the five workmen named in its order. Accordingly, it awarded them wages in the aggregate sum of


18-section briefs on any result in this list

Apr 22 2008

Sharda Construction Vs. Authority Under Minimum Wages Act, 1948 and Re ...

Court: Mumbai

Decided on: Apr-22-2008

Reported in: (2009)IILLJ303Bom

S.C. Dharmadhikari, J.1. The petitioner was opponent No. 1 before the Authority under the Minimum Wages Act and Regional Labour Commissioner (Central) Mumbai. The proceedings are numbered as MCA 21/2007.2. That was an application … respondent No. 2 before me. This application which was preferred on July 9,2007 under Section 20(2) of the Minimum Wages Act, 1948 stated that the said establishment was inspected in January 2007. Petitioner was carrying on activities as


Jan 13 2009

D.A.V. Public School (U.P.) Vs. Prescribed Authority (Minimum Wages Ac ...

Court: Allahabad

Decided on: Jan-13-2009

Reported in: 2009(1)AWC823; (2009)IIILLJ399All

Matched in: Parties D.A.V. Public School (U.P.) Vs. Prescribed Authority (Minimum Wages Act) 1948/Assistant Labour Commissioner and ors.


Dec 11 2008

General Manager, Aligarh Dugdh Utpadak Sahkari Sangh Ltd. (Parag Dairy ...

Court: Allahabad

Decided on: Dec-11-2008

Reported in: (2009)IIILLJ499All

of Wages Act, 1948/Deputy Labour Commissioner, Aligarh, by which he has awarded Rs. 1,86,696/- as the difference between minimum wages and the wages paid to the 56 workmen engaged by the petitioner as labour, paiker, mali, lab assistant, … Shri Roshan Singh, contractors to work in the dairy run by the petitioner. They claimed the difference of minimum wages and wages paid to them for the period from August 2005 to January 2006 and ten times compensation


Oct 14 2004

Hindu Inter College Vs. Prescribed Authority (Minimum Wages Act, 1948) ...

Court: Allahabad

Decided on: Oct-14-2004

Reported in: [2005(104)FLR723]

this Court.3. The short question is whether a teacher in a private educational institution is governed by the Minimum Wages Act. This controversy is no longer res integra after the decision of the Supreme Court in Haryana Unrecognized … v. State of Haryana : 1996 (73) FLR 1086 (SC).4. Following the said decision we hold that the Minimum Wages Act does not apply to a teacher in a private educational institution. The petition is consequently allowed and


Oct 06 2015

Principal and Director, Motilal Nehru School of Sports Vs. Authority, ...

Court: Punjab and Haryana

Decided on: Oct-06-2015

1. There is no dispute that the claimants who had filed an application under Section 20(2) of the Minimum Wages Act, 1948 (for short 'the Act'), were paid less than minimum rates of wages fixed for the scheduled … exercise of powers conferred by Sub-section (2) of Section 5 of the Act after consultation with the State Minimum Wages Advisory Board, Haryana notifying the revised Schedule annexed to the notification listing scheduled employments where the rigours of


Dec 28 1998

Pondur Milk Producers Co.Operative Society Vs. Authority Under Minimum ...

Court: Andhra Pradesh

Decided on: Dec-28-1998

Reported in: 1999(1)ALD435; 1999(1)ALT494; [1999(82)FLR192]; (1999)IILLJ286AP

are decided by this judgment.2. These petitions are filed against the orders passed by the Authority under the Minimum Wages Act. By the order under challenge, the authority allowed the claim of the respondent and directed payment of … allowed the claim of the respondent and directed payment of difference of wages as it was found that minimum wages had not been paid. The order is challenged mainly on two grounds.(1) that the claim itself was time


Oct 17 1995

Micro Raj Electronics (Pvt.) Ltd. Vs. Authority Under Minimum Wages Ac ...

Court: Andhra Pradesh

Decided on: Oct-17-1995

Reported in: 1996(1)ALT202; (1996)ILLJ1111AP

the delay of 777 days in presenting the application by the 2nd respondent under Section 20 of the Minimum Wages Act.2. It is submitted by the petitioner - management that 2nd respondent filed the applications claiming difference of … Act.2. It is submitted by the petitioner - management that 2nd respondent filed the applications claiming difference of minimum wages in respect of the workmen employed by the petitioners especially for the period from June 1, 1993 to


  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »
Loading chart…

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial