Minimum Wages Act - Judgment Search Results

Sharda Construction Vs. Authority Under Minimum Wages Act, 1948 and Re ...

Court: Mumbai

Reported in: (2009)IILLJ303Bom

S.C. Dharmadhikari, J.1. The petitioner was opponent No. 1 before the Authority under the Minimum Wages Act and Regional Labour Commissioner (Central) Mumbai. The proceedings are numbered as MCA 21/2007.2. That was an application made … respondent No. 2 before me. This application which was preferred on July 9,2007 under Section 20(2) of the Minimum Wages Act, 1948 stated that the said establishment was inspected in January 2007. Petitioner was carrying on activities as Contractor

D.A.V. Public School (U.P.) Vs. Prescribed Authority (Minimum Wages Ac ...

Court: Allahabad

Reported in: 2009(1)AWC823; (2009)IIILLJ399All

services were terminated on 31.3.2001. Thereafter, on 23.6.2004, he filed an application before prescribed authority under Payment of Wages Act, 1936, which was registered as P.W.A. Case No. 60 of 2004. In the said application, he claimed that

Hindu Inter College Vs. Prescribed Authority (Minimum Wages Act, 1948) ...

Court: Allahabad

Reported in: [2005(104)FLR723]

this Court.3. The short question is whether a teacher in a private educational institution is governed by the Minimum Wages Act. This controversy is no longer res integra after the decision of the Supreme Court in Haryana Unrecognized Schools' … v. State of Haryana : 1996 (73) FLR 1086 (SC).4. Following the said decision we hold that the Minimum Wages Act does not apply to a teacher in a private educational institution. The petition is consequently allowed and the

Principal and Director, Motilal Nehru School of Sports Vs. Authority, ...

Court: Punjab and Haryana

1. There is no dispute that the claimants who had filed an application under Section 20(2) of the Minimum Wages Act, 1948 (for short 'the Act'), were paid less than minimum rates of wages fixed for the scheduled employment. … discharged by it and has been breached in presence of the notification and therefore, the authority under the Minimum Wages Act, Sonipat is perfectly justified in awarding the difference of wages paid as per the minimum wages fixed for

Pondur Milk Producers Co.Operative Society Vs. Authority Under Minimum ...

Court: Andhra Pradesh

Reported in: 1999(1)ALD435; 1999(1)ALT494; [1999(82)FLR192]; (1999)IILLJ286AP

are decided by this judgment.2. These petitions are filed against the orders passed by the Authority under the Minimum Wages Act. By the order under challenge, the authority allowed the claim of the respondent and directed payment of difference … mainly on two grounds.(1) that the claim itself was time barred, and(2) that, in terms of Schedule to Minimum Wages Act, 1948 the writ petitioner is not an employer subject to Minimum Wages Act.3. It is true that the

Micro Raj Electronics (Pvt.) Ltd. Vs. Authority Under Minimum Wages Ac ...

Court: Andhra Pradesh

Reported in: 1996(1)ALT202; (1996)ILLJ1111AP

contention of the learned counsel for the management is that the provisions contained in Section 20 of the Minimum Wages Act (for short the Act) have not been complied with by the authority while condoning the delay. Further no … the delay of 777 days in presenting the application by the 2nd respondent under Section 20 of the Minimum Wages Act.2. It is submitted by the petitioner - management that 2nd respondent filed the applications claiming difference of minimum

Chacha Nehru Vidyapith Vs. Authority Under Minimum Wages Act, 1948-cum ...

Court: Jharkhand

Reported in: 2001(49)BLJR1066; [2001(89)FLR1060]; (2001)ILLJ1439Jhar

Nehru Vidyapith, is not schedule-employment and it is not covered by any employment specified in a schedule of Minimum Wages Act, 1948 and further for quashing the orders passed by respondents whereby it is held that the petitioner school … school are teachers as well as clerk and ad-ministerial staff. In 1994, respondent No. 3, Labour Superintendent-cum-Inspector under Minimum Wages Act, filed an application against the Secretary of the School for and on behalf of the teachers and non-teaching

Ponnambalan Vs. Authority Under Minimum Wages Act

Court: Kerala

Reported in: (1995)ILLJ493Ker

employed as a sales assistant till December 4, 1988. Alleging non-payment of the minimum wages payable under the Minimum Wages Act, 1947 (the Act in brief), the second respondent filed an application before the first respondent under Section 20 … Industrial - minimum wages - Articles 13, 23 and 226 of Constitution of India and Section 20 of Minimum Wages Act - employee filed application for recovery of minimum wages - Court allowed application partly as part of claim

Ponnambalan Vs. Authority Under Minimum Wages Act

Court: Kerala

Reported in: [1995(70)FLR387]; (1994)ILLJ1195Ker

Original Petition the petitioner/employee seeks to quash Ext. P6 order passed by the first respondent Authority under the Minimum Wages Act, 1948 directing the employer to pay compensation of Rs. 3,235/- in addition to the difference in wages amounting … to December 5, 1988. On March 8, 1989 the employee filed an application under Section 20(2) of the Minimum Wages Act, 1948 for issuing a direction to the employer for payment of difference between the wages payable under the

Rajasthan Minerals and Company Vs. Authority Under Minimum Wages Act a ...

Court: Rajasthan

Reported in: (1994)ILLJ261Raj

of Rs. 9, 168.45 as difference-amount of wages (minimum paid) and Rs. 73,347.60 as compensation under Section 20, Minimum Wages Act, 1948 (hereinafter called 'the Act') and also order dated August 25, 1988 (Annexure 3) of the Authority dismissing … J.1. This writ petition has been filed for quashing the ex parte order of the Authority under the Minimum Wages Act-cum-Regional Labour Commissioner (Central), Ajmer (hereinafter to be called the Authority) dated January 28, 1985 (Annexure 2) directing the