Skip to content
How to use Narrow results with filters
  1. Run a keyword search first to load the results page.
  2. Select Supreme Court, a High Court, or tribunal on the left.
  3. Optionally filter by decision year to focus on recent or historical cases.

Mines - Judgment Search Results

Pulse this search Log in to save a LexPulse alert for this search

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial to open GPT-powered briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results — plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Apr 04 2016

Maps Mines and Minerals Limited Through Its Manager Puneet Kumar Modi ...

Court: Jharkhand

Decided on: Apr-04-2016

with W. P. (C) No. 4927 of 2015 … Maps Mines and Minerals Ltd. East Singhbhum ... …Petitioner (in both cases)


Apr 23 2002

Mining and Allied Machinery Corporation Workers' Union and Ors. Vs. Mi ...

Court: Mumbai

Decided on: Apr-23-2002

Reported in: 2002(6)BomCR204; [2002(95)FLR1127]; (2003)ILLJ660Bom

J.P. Devadhar, J. 1. By this petition, the petitioners, a Trade Union, seek a writ of mandamus directing the Mining...


Oct 28 2010

Lakshminarayana Mining Company Vs. Director of Mines Safety Bellary Re ...

Court: Karnataka

Decided on: Oct-28-2010

& Company, there-ore the provisions under Regulation 111(2) of Mettaliferous Mines Regulation, 1961 are attracted. You are hereby advised not to


Turn these results into brief-ready notes

May 19 1958

Alhambra Gold Mine Corp. Vs. Alhambra-shumway Mines

Court: US Supreme Court

Decided on: May-19-1958

ALHAMBRA GOLD MINE CORP. v. ALHAMBRA-SHUMWAY MINES - 356 U.S. 583 (1958) U.S. Supreme Court ALHAMBRA GOLD


Mar 09 1903

Kennedy Mining Co. Vs. Argonaut Mining Co.

Court: US Supreme Court

Decided on: Mar-09-1903

contention is that the title to ore taken from a mine depends upon whether the mine was patented under the Act


May 02 1904

St. Louis Mining and Milling Co. Vs. Montana Mining Co.

Court: US Supreme Court

Decided on: May-02-1904

right to pursue. As said by Lindley (1 Lindley on Mines, 2d ed. § 71): "In other words, under the old


May 02 1904

Clipper Mining Co. Vs. Eli Mining Co.

Court: US Supreme Court

Decided on: May-02-1904

applications. In support of this is cited 2 Lindley on Mines, section 721, in which the author says: "Where an application


Jan 14 1907

Montana Mining Co. Vs. St. Louis Mining Co.

Court: US Supreme Court

Decided on: Jan-14-1907

and grantee (owners of adjoining claims), together with all the mineral therein and all the dips, spurs, angles, etc., were construed


Mar 08 1909

Mammoth Mining Co. Vs. Grand Central Mining Co.

Court: US Supreme Court

Decided on: Mar-08-1909

question arises, we quote from the judgment under review: "The mines are found in a lime belt which covers about two


Apr 26 1915

Stewart Mining Co. Vs. Ontario Mining Co.

Court: US Supreme Court

Decided on: Apr-26-1915

said that the definition has been approved in Lindley on Mines, because, as therein expressed, it "involves the elements of terminal


  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

Try AI Brief & Semantic Search — 7 days free


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial