Skip to content


Mineral Development - Judgment Search Results

Home > Cases Phrase: mineral development Page 1 of about 121 results (0.038 seconds)
Jun 20 2000 (HC)

Gujarat Mineral Development Corporation Employees Union Vs. Gujarat Mi ...

Court: Gujarat

Reported in: [2001(88)FLR450]; (2002)1GLR26

Civil Application No. 3631 of 1990 is filed by Gujarat Mineral Development Corporation (hereinafter referred to as 'the Corporation') under Article Application No. 3631 of 1990 is filed by Gujarat Mineral Development Corporation (hereinafter referred to as 'the Corporation') under Article 226

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Dec 03 2015 (HC)

National Mineral Development Corporation Limited, rep. by its Regional ...

Court: Karnataka

forest produce other than timber, sandalwood, firewood, charcoal, bamboos and minerals and includes forest produce such as myrobalams, barks, fibres, flosses, take under its control the regulation of mines and the development of minerals to the extent provided under the Act. Therefore,

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

May 24 2004 (HC)

National Mineral Development Corporation Limited and ors. Vs. the Stat ...

Court: Karnataka

Reported in: ILR2004KAR3519

were issued for acquisition of right to saltpetre, a minor mineral and for auctioning certain saltpetre bearing areas. It was held either cess on royalty or tax on royalty or Forest Development Tax on royalty, etc., payable for extraction of minerals under

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Dec 03 2015 (HC)

National Mineral Development Corporation Ltd Vs. State of Karnataka by ...

Court: Karnataka

exercise of the said power, has framed the Karnataka Minor Minerals Concession Rules. In exercise of the power conferred under Entry bearing on these matters). In M/s.Lakshminarayana Mining Co vs. Taluk Development Board (AIR1972Mysore299) (M/s. Lakshminarayana Mining Co), the holders of mining

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Nov 27 2006 (HC)

National Mineral Development Corporation Limited a Company Incorporate ...

Court: Karnataka

Reported in: 2007(2)KLJ235; 2007(1)KCCRSN16; 2007(1)AIRKarR402

is the owner of minerals within its territory and the minerals vest in it. The State Government had the inherent right which land earlier had been granted to the National Mineral Development Corporation who had surrendered the same to the Government. The

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

May 05 2004 (SC)

National Mineral Development Corpn. Ltd. Vs. State of M.P. and anr.

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: [2004(4)JCR30(SC)]; JT2004(5)SC172; 2004(5)SCALE345; (2004)6SCC281

leased area, then, royalty shall be chargeable on the processed mineral removed from the leased area.(2) In case run-of-mine mineral is the appeals raise a common issue for decision.2. National Mineral Development Corpn. Ltd. ('NMDC', for short) is a public sector company

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Feb 08 2005 (HC)

Andhra Pradesh Mineral Development Corporation Vs. Rlp Granite Private ...

Court: Andhra Pradesh

Reported in: AIR2005AP298; 2005(2)ALD289; 2005(1)ALT761

applications for grant of quarry lease in case of minor minerals but once it is granted, the continuance of lease will the surface rights as well as prudent exploitation and the development of minerals is thus balanced by the provisions of the

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Feb 25 1999 (HC)

National Mineral Development Corporation Ltd., Hyderabad Vs. State of ...

Court: Madhya Pradesh

Reported in: AIR1999MP112; 2000(1)MPLJ429

is to be charged on the minerals, the moment the minerals are removed from the leased area. This concept has been 2 gives a declaration that the regulation of mines and development of mineral shall be governed by Union as provided under

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Aug 10 1982 (HC)

Gujarat Mineral Development Corporation Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Incom ...

Court: Gujarat

Reported in: (1983)34CTR(Guj)250; [1983]143ITR822(Guj)

Chhota-Udepur, district Baroda. At the relevant point of time M/s. Mineral Mining Company, Madras, had a prospecting license for extracting fluorspar Now, s. 11(1) of the Mines and Minerals (Regulation and Development) Act, 1957, lays down that where a prospecting license has

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jul 14 1997 (HC)

National Mineral Development Corporation Limited Vs. State of Karnatak ...

Court: Karnataka

Reported in: AIR1997Kant331; ILR1997KAR2528; 1997(4)KarLJ162

much within the period prescribed under Rule 24A of the Mineral Rules and had even discharged its obligations of paying the does not include any work relating or ancillary to conservation, development and management of forests and wild-life, namely, the establishment of

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

  • << Prev.

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //