Mine - Judgment Search Results

Maps Mines and Minerals Limited Through Its Manager Puneet Kumar Modi ...

Court: Jharkhand

RANCHI W. P. (C) No. 5006 of 2013 with W. P. (C) No. 4927 of 2015 … Maps Mines and Minerals Ltd. East Singhbhum ... …Petitioner (in both cases) -V e r s u s- 1. The

Mining and Allied Machinery Corporation Workers' Union and Ors. Vs. Mi ...

Court: Mumbai

Reported in: 2002(6)BomCR204; [2002(95)FLR1127]; (2003)ILLJ660Bom

J.P. Devadhar, J. 1. By this petition, the petitioners, a Trade Union, seek a writ of mandamus directing the Mining and Allied Machinery Corporation Ltd. to pay wages to its workmen at the regional workshop at...

Lakshminarayana Mining Company Vs. Director of Mines Safety Bellary Re ...

Court: Karnataka

dated 12.05.2010 enclosing a plan showing the mining leases of M/s LMC. M/s Chowgule & Company, M/s SB Minerals and M/s Aswathnarayana Stngh & company. As there exists a dispute between your mine and adjoining mine belongs

Alhambra Gold Mine Corp. Vs. Alhambra-shumway Mines

Court: US Supreme Court

ALHAMBRA GOLD MINE CORP. v. ALHAMBRA-SHUMWAY MINES - 356 U.S. 583 (1958) U.S. Supreme Court ALHAMBRA GOLD MINE CORP. v. ALHAMBRA-SHUMWAY

Kennedy Mining Co. Vs. Argonaut Mining Co.

Court: US Supreme Court

OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA Syllabus Where the contention is that the title to ore taken from a mine depends upon whether the mine was patented under the Act of July 26, 1866, or the Act of

St. Louis Mining and Milling Co. Vs. Montana Mining Co.

Court: US Supreme Court

the claim, and that the balance of the underground territory is open to anyone seeking to explore for mineral, or at least may be taken possession of by one other than the owner of the claim for

Clipper Mining Co. Vs. Eli Mining Co.

Court: US Supreme Court

in Cosmos Exploration Co. v. Gray Eagle Oil Co., 112 F. 4, 16, that "some of the richest mineral lands in the United States, which have been owned, occupied, and developed by individuals and corporations for many

Montana Mining Co. Vs. St. Louis Mining Co.

Court: US Supreme Court

to which was in dispute between the grantor and grantee (owners of adjoining claims), together with all the mineral therein and all the dips, spurs, angles, etc., were construed as not simply locating a boundary between the

Mammoth Mining Co. Vs. Grand Central Mining Co.

Court: US Supreme Court

For the character of the country where the question arises, we quote from the judgment under review: "The mines are found in a lime belt which covers about two square miles, and is the great producing area

Stewart Mining Co. Vs. Ontario Mining Co.

Court: US Supreme Court

alleged that within such claim there "is a certain vein or lode bearing silver, lead, and other valuable minerals, of which said vein or lode and the ore and mineral therein contained this plaintiff is the owner