Mid May - Judgment Search Results

Mid Town Developers Vs. Shyamal Adhicary and ors.

Court: Kolkata

of 1994 GA No.1034 of 2014 IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA Ordinary Original Civil Jurisdiction ORIGINAL SIDE MID TOWN DEVELOPERS Versus SHYAMAL ADHICARY & ORS.BEFORE: The Hon'ble JUSTICE DEBANGSU BASAK Date : 8th May, 2014. Appearance:

M/S Mid Link Consultants Through Its Proprietor vs.union of India and ...

Court: Delhi

$~53 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 9881/2015 M/S MID LINK CONSULTANTS THROUGH ITS PROPRIETOR UNION OF INDIA AND ANR Through: Mr Nishit Kush, Advocate. versus ........ Petitioner … performance should be at least ten percent of the Registration Certificate capacity (30 or 100 as the case may be).” 6. It is apparent from the reading of clause (iii) above that the mandatory condition for entertaining

Mid Land Fruit and Vegetable Products (India) (P.) Ltd. Vs. Inspecting ...

Court: Delhi

Reported in: [1989]30ITD470(Delhi)

law into account, albeit, erroneously, the orders of the authorities below are not in accordance with law. These may be set aside with the directions that results declared by the assessed on the of the market value … and is hereby opened with Canara Bank, Okhla Industrial Estate, New Delhi with the following title :-(i) The Midland Fruit and Vegetable Products (India) Pvt. Ltd. (Registered Office Account);(ii) The Midland Fruit and Vegetable Projects (India) Pvt.

Radio Mid Day West (India) Ltd. Vs. Union of India (Uoi) Its Process B ...

Court: SEBI Securities and Exchange Board of India or Securities Appellate Tribunal SAT

Matched in: Parties Radio Mid Day West (India) Ltd. Vs. Union of India (Uoi) Its Process Be

Mid East Port Folio Management Vs. Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax

Court: Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Mumbai

Reported in: (2003)87ITD537(Mum.)

Tribunal. The events leading up to the reference may be briefly noticed.2. The appeal of the assessee M/s Mid East Portfolio Management Ltd. before the Tribunal involved several issues, one of which was whether the assessee was

Mid East Shipping Co. (P.) Ltd. Vs. Asstt. Commissioner of

Court: Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Delhi

Reported in: (1992)40ITD611(Delhi)

Matched in: Parties Mid East Shipping Co. (P.) Ltd. Vs. Asstt. Commissioner of

Mid-Con Freight Systems, Inc. Vs. Michigan Pub. Serv. Comm'n

Court: US Supreme Court

each participating State its share of the total registration fee. §367.6(a). The SSRS statute specifies that a State may not impose any additional “registration requirement.” It states specifically, in the statutory sentence at issue here, that when … Mid-Con Freight Systems, Inc. v. Michigan Pub. Serv. Comm'n - 03-1234 (2005) SYLLABUS OCTOBER TERM, 2004 MID-CON FREIGHT SYSTEMS,

Sereboff Vs. Mid Atlantic Medical Services, Inc.

Court: US Supreme Court

certiorari to the united states court of appeals for the fourth circuit No. 05-260. Argued March 28, 2006-Decided May 15, 2006 Petitioner Sereboffs are beneficiaries under a health insurance plan administered by respondent Mid Atlantic and covered … Sereboff v. Mid Atlantic Medical Services, Inc. - 05-260 (2006) SYLLABUS OCTOBER TERM, 2005 SEREBOFF V. MID ATLANTIC MEDICAL SERVICES, INC.

X Vs. Mid Sussex Citizens Advice Bureau and Another

Court: UK Supreme Court

and practical qualifications in law. From 12th May 2006 she became a volunteer adviser for the respondent, the Mid Sussex Citizens Advice Bureau ("the CAB"). She did this after an interview in which it was explained that

Skinner Vs. Mid-america Pipeline Co.

Court: US Supreme Court

assessed fees be used to finance activities authorized by the HLPSA and the NGPSA, and that such fees may not exceed 105 percent of the aggregate of congressional appropriations for the fiscal year for activities to be … Skinner v. Mid-America Pipeline Co. - 490 U.S. 212 (1989) U.S. Supreme Court Skinner v. Mid-America Pipeline Co., 490 U.S. 212