Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: metro railways construction of works act 1978 chapter iii acquisition Sorted by: old Page 1 of about 3,274 results (0.900 seconds)

Aug 20 2010 (SC)

Rajinder Kishan Gupta and anr. Vs. Union of India and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

..... was challenged before the high court which ended in dismissal. as raised before the high court, it was contended before us that in view of the metro railways (construction of works) act, 1978, the respondents are not permitted to invoke urgency provision under the land acquisition act which deprived the appellants from participating in the ..... goel for dda.5) main contentions:i) when the acquisition of the land is for dmrc and when there is a specific act, namely, the metro railways (construction of works) act, 1978 whether the authorities are justified in invoking the urgency provision in the land acquisition act by dispensing enquiry under section 5a of the ..... enquiry under section 5a. the metro railways act (no. 33 of 1978) was enacted by the parliament to provide for the construction of works relating to metro railways in the metropolitan cities. chapter iii of the said act deals with `acquisition'. it is not .....

Tag this Judgment!

Feb 05 2016 (HC)

M/s. Transstroy (India) Limited Vs. The State of Telangana, Department ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

..... arise for consideration: 1. whether the acquisition under the land acquisition act, 1894/central act 30 of 2013 is invalid in view of the metro railways (construction of works) act, 1978 and metro railways (operation and maintenance) act, 2002. 2. since section 4(1) notification under the act of 1894 is published in the hyderabad district ..... the contention of the learned counsel for the petitioner. 13. as raised before the high court, it was contended before us that in view of the metro railways (construction of works) act, 1978, the respondents are not permitted to invoke urgency provision under the land acquisition act which deprived the appellants from participating in the ..... -a enquiry and contends that all proceedings including the award proceedings are vitiated, as the very inapplicability of act 30 of 2013, in view of the metro railways (construction of works) act, 1978, being stipulated under schedule iv of the act 30 of 2013. on these averments, the reliefs, sought for in this writ .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 02 1906 (FN)

Montana Catholic Missions Vs. Missoula County

Court : US Supreme Court

..... that, with the permission of the indians inhabiting and entitled to inhabit the said reservation and the government of the united states, the said jesuit fathers have constructed on the said reservation, at great expense, extensive school buildings, with dormitories, and in connection therewith, for the purpose of teaching the said indians the manual ..... by a statement in legal and logical form, such as good pleading requires, that there is a controversy really involving the construction or application of the federal constitution or that the validity or construction of a treaty or statute made under its authority is drawn in question. page 200 u. s. 119 the circuit court ..... of the complaint above set forth to show either the existence of any question involving the construction or application of the federal constitution, or that the constitutionality of any law of the united states, or the validity or construction of any treaty made under its authority, was drawn in question. this must appear .....

Tag this Judgment!

Dec 22 1915 (PC)

Mohesh Chandra Addy Vs. Panchu Mudali

Court : Kolkata

Reported in : 32Ind.Cas.395

..... made to be followed and is a salutary rule prescribed for safeguarding the interests of litigants and should certainly be followed in the moffusil in the manner indicated by the construction placed on the same in the answers to the several references. it must be fully complied with by the pleader who first accepts the vakalatnama and all subsequent acceptances must .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jul 17 1945 (PC)

Emperor Vs. Sibnath Banerji

Court : Mumbai

Reported in : (1946)48BOMLR1

..... express exception of habeas corpus cases, and having in view the terms and purpose of the section, their lordships are unable to limit the terms of the section by mere construction so as to exclude these cases from its operation. accordingly section 205 of the act of 1935 provides one of the exceptions referred to in section 404 of the criminal procedure code ..... as proved unless and until it is disproved....accordingly, the contention of the crown that the court has no jurisdiction to investigate the validity of the orders fails.23. on construction of rule 26, the majority of the judges of the federal court held that the governor must be personally satisfied as to the matters therein set out, and that, in .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 21 1952 (SC)

N.P. Ponnuswami Vs. Returning Officer, Namakkal Constituency and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : AIR1952SC64; (1952)IMLJ775(SC); [1952]1SCR218

..... something which has happened before a candidate is declared elected is not the same thing as questioning an election, and the arguments advanced on his behalf in support of this construction were these :- (1) that the word 'election' as used in article 329(b) means what it normally and etymologically means, namely, the result of polling or ..... 15. i think that a brief examination of the scheme of part xv of the constitution and the representation of the people act, 1951, will show that the construction i have suggested is the correct one. broadly speaking, before an election machinery can be brought into operation there are three requisites which requires to be attended to, ..... personally and by his agents. thereupon, he applied for special leave to appeal to her majesty in council but it was refused on the ground that the fair construction of the act of 1875 and the act of 1872 which preceded it providing among, other things that the judgment of the superior court' shall not be susceptible .....

Tag this Judgment!

Nov 20 1959 (HC)

K.T. Rolling Mills Private Ltd. and anr. Vs. M.R. Meher and ors.

Court : Mumbai

Reported in : AIR1963Bom146; (1962)64BOMLR645; (1962)IILLJ667Bom

..... result in an encroachment on the legislature. the court takes a middle ground and while preferring in the first instance the application of the canon of literal construction, does, where necessary, resort to other established principles and rules aimed at furthering the ascertainment of the true intention and meaning of the law-maker. one ..... has ruled that these categories of workmen should not have the right to claim lay-off compensation. i find strong and obvious reasons for preferring this construction because the very nature of the work of those employed in industrial establishments which are of a seasonal character or in which work is performed only intermittently ..... mean that a large number of industrial establishments which do not satisfy the requirements of section 25a would be left out and he gave as instances, the railways, the port trust and so on. he says that the legislature could not have intended to discriminate against the employees employed in other undertakings even though .....

Tag this Judgment!

Feb 16 1960 (HC)

K.T. Rolling Mills (Private), Ltd. Vs. Meher M.R. and ors.

Court : Mumbai

Reported in : (1962)IILLJ667Bom

..... result in an encroachment on the legislature. the court takes a middle ground and while preferring in the first instance the application of the canon of literal construction, does, where necessary, resort to other established principles and rules aimed at furthering the ascertainment of the true intention and meaning of the law-maker. one ..... has ruled that these categories of workmen should not have the right to claim lay-off compensation. i find strong and obvious reasons for preferring this construction because the very nature of the work of those employed in industrial establishments which are of a seasonal character or in which work is performed only intermittently ..... mean that a large number of industrial establishments which do not satisfy the requirements of s. 25a would be left out and he gave as instances, the railways, the port trust and so on. he says that the legislature could not have intended to discriminate against the employees employed in other undertakings even though they .....

Tag this Judgment!

Sep 05 1960 (SC)

K.M. Nanavati Vs. the State of Bombay

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : AIR1961SC112; (1961)63BOMLR221; 1961CriLJ173; [1961]1SCR497

..... portion of it which is termed reprieveor stay of execution or suspension and respite of sentence which differs fromsuspension of sentences only in terminology. the construction suggested wouldbe illogical because the plenitude if the language would remain unaffectedbefore the petition for leave to appeal is filed and after the decision of ..... contemplate that two authorities, i.e.,executive and judicial should operate in the same field and that it isnecessary that this court should put a harmonious construction on them. article142 of the constitution, it was contended, is couched in language of the widestamplitude and comprises powers of suspension of sentences etc. ..... 142 and the executive power under art. 161 can withincertain narrow limits be exercised in the same field. the question thatimmediately arises is one of harmonious construction of two provisions of theconstitution, as one is not made subject to the other by specific words in theconstitution itself. as already pointed out, art. .....

Tag this Judgment!

Nov 25 1960 (SC)

The State of Uttar Pradesh and ors. Vs. Babu Ram Upadhya

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : AIR1961SC751; 1961CriLJ773; (1970)ILLJ670SC; [1961]2SCR679

..... that all statutory rules vis-a-vis the disciplinary proceedings taken against a government servant are administrative directions, and the other applies the well settled rules of construction and holds thaw the appropriate authority is bound to comply with the mandatory provisions of the rules in making an inquiry under a particular statute. a close ..... regard, inter alia, to conditions of service without impinging upon the overriding power recognized under art. 310. 18. learned counsel for the respondent contends that this construction is inconsistent with that prevailing in the english law and that the intention of the framers of the constitution could not have been to make a radical departure ..... the validity of the act done in disregard of them.' 41. this passage was accepted by the judicial committee of the privy council in the case of montreal street railway company v. normandin l.r. [1917] a.c.170 and by this court in state of u.p. v. manbodhan lal srivastava : (1958)iillj273sc 42. .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //