Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: metro railways construction of works act 1978 chapter iii acquisition Sorted by: old Court: andhra pradesh Page 1 of about 154 results (0.058 seconds)

Feb 05 2016 (HC)

M/s. Transstroy (India) Limited Vs. The State of Telangana, Department ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

..... arise for consideration: 1. whether the acquisition under the land acquisition act, 1894/central act 30 of 2013 is invalid in view of the metro railways (construction of works) act, 1978 and metro railways (operation and maintenance) act, 2002. 2. since section 4(1) notification under the act of 1894 is published in the hyderabad district ..... the contention of the learned counsel for the petitioner. 13. as raised before the high court, it was contended before us that in view of the metro railways (construction of works) act, 1978, the respondents are not permitted to invoke urgency provision under the land acquisition act which deprived the appellants from participating in the ..... -a enquiry and contends that all proceedings including the award proceedings are vitiated, as the very inapplicability of act 30 of 2013, in view of the metro railways (construction of works) act, 1978, being stipulated under schedule iv of the act 30 of 2013. on these averments, the reliefs, sought for in this writ .....

Tag this Judgment!

Sep 14 2000 (HC)

Koppula Narasaiah and Another Vs. Government of A.P. and Others

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Reported in : 2000(6)ALD299; 2000(6)ALT337

..... ceased or not. the fulfilment of this depends on various circumstances depending on the public purpose for which the land is acquired. forinstance, if the land is acquired for construction of a school building, after completion of the school building it cannot be said that public purpose has ceased. the land may have been acquired for the school building ..... multipurpose river project. the nagarjunasagar project is intended to be permanent and perpetual. therefore, it can never be said that after completion of the main dam, its irrigation system, construction of colonies, offices etc., public purpose has ceased. applying the test in syed yahya quadri's case (supra) it can never be said that after a period of ..... if the land is again required for public purpose it shall not be re-conveyed. if the land is situated at a distance of half a mile from a railway station it shall not be re-conveyed under bso 90. if the land is originally building site or town site, it shall be sold only by way of .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jul 10 2001 (HC)

Sidhartha Academy of General and Technical Education, Sidharthnagar, V ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Reported in : 2001(5)ALD29

..... to 1987 and in view of the increase in the students, to increase the hostel facilities, the academy had decided to increase the room strength of the hostel.2. the construction, development etc., of the land within urban areas has been regulated by a.p. urban areas (development) act, 1975 (hereinafter referred to as 'the act'). the act ..... and rs.10/- per sq. metre in case of development of building. in the year 1996 the petitioner academy approached the second respondent and had applied permission for construction of girls hostel consisting 3+1 floors having built up area of 3960 sq. meters. according to the petitioner after the amendment, the power to fix the rates ..... types of development. it is further stated that the petitioner has no cause of action as it has not applied for any fresh permission with regard to any proposed construction.5. before coming to the rival arguments it will be profitable to refer to certain provisions of the a.p. urban areas (development) act, 1975. this act .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jul 29 2009 (TRI)

Vora Towers Welfare Association Vs. Janatha Industrial Foundry Works a ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Hyderabad

..... several defects as sub-paragraphs (a) to (p), they did not take trouble to co-relate those grievances to the corresponding terms in the construction agreement as no construction agreement between the promoter and the individual flat owner has been filed in this case. however some of those grievances are capable of being shown ..... was tailored to ensure, inter alia, vestiture of the ownership of the flat in the person, who contracts with a promoter absolutely in terms of the construction agreement as fortified by the act, rules and the formulations thereunder. unfortunately this intendment suffered and still stands crippled from myriad of disorders of a grave ..... applicable in the matter. the rights and liabilities as also mutual obligations between a builder (technically called promoter) under the a.p. apartments (promotion of construction and ownership) act, 1987 and the rules thereunder (hereinafter called for brevity the act and the rules) are marked to be principally governed by the said .....

Tag this Judgment!

Dec 09 2011 (HC)

Greater Hyderabad Municipal Employees

Court : Andhra Pradesh

..... 'independent engineer', who is a third party, shall be the nodal person for supervision and monitoring of compliance by concessionaire with respect to the construction requirements and o&m requirements, more particularly to undertake, perform, carry out the duties, responsibilities, services and activities set forth in the bid ..... burden on the administration and lead to increased and unbudgeted expenditure. ( 23. ) the same view has been reiterated in asia foundation and construction ltd. v. trafalgar house construction (i) ltd., (1997) 1 scc 738, the court observing that judicial review of contractual transactions by government bodies is permissible to prevent ..... respondent invested crores of rupees to prepare infrastructure to remove and process garbage as per the statutory provisions. the basic infrastructure has to be constructed for disposal of garbage without spoiling the land and environment by investing huge amounts. considering various aspects of the project, its technical and .....

Tag this Judgment!

Dec 31 1969 (HC)

Dr. (Mrs. Renuka Datla Vs. Commissioner of Income-tax

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Reported in : [1999]107TAXMAN143(AP)

..... of the legislature.' [emphasis supplied]17. the supreme court then referred to the following passage in keshaiji ravji & co.'s case (supra):'artificial and unduly latitudinarian rules of construction which, with their general tendency to 'give the taxpayer the breaks' are out of place where the legislation has a fiscal mission.. . .' (p. 1807)18. in ..... should be given a similar concession. that would mean legislation by this court and this court has no legislative powers.' (p. 9)19. the principle of construction of a provision in a tax statute providing for an exception or exemption has been succinctly summarised by the supreme court in novopan india ltd. v. collector ..... ambiguity, a taxing statute should be construed in favour of the assessee - assuming that the said principle is good and sound - does not apply to the construction of an exception or an exempting provision; they have to be construed strictly. a person invoking an exception or an exemption provision to relieve him of the .....

Tag this Judgment!

Sep 23 1975 (HC)

Chella Rama Bhupal Reddy Vs. Central Board of Direct Taxes and anr.

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Reported in : [1977]108ITR695(AP)

..... will be injured or impaired thereby...... whether a statutory requirement which relates to official action shall be considered mandatory or permissive, depends upon the effect the suggested construction has upon public and private rights. if the requirements of the statute must be regarded as mandatory in order to promote justice, it should be so construed, ..... directs. he must act reasonably.'13. to the same effect is the following observation of lord macnaghten in mayor &c.; of westminster v. london and north western railway co. [1905] ac 426'it is well-settled that a public body invested with statutory powers ......must take care not to exceed or abuse its powers. it ..... in the case of the exercise of power by the central government under the first part of this provision. as ruled by the judicial committee in montreal street railway company v. normandin [1917] ac 170 for the determination of the question whether a particular provision in a statute is directory or imperative 'no general rule .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 25 1978 (HC)

Mallikarjuna Sharma and ors. Vs. the State of A.P. and ors.

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Reported in : 1978CriLJ1354

..... court, observed:this statutory right, which is conferred on the supreme court advocates in relation to other courts and which they did not have before, cannot as a matter of construction, be taken to be controlled by reference to what they are allowed or not allowed to do in the supreme court under the rules of that court. such rules are .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jul 28 1978 (HC)

United India Fire and General Insurance Co. Ltd. Vs. Maddali Susheela ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Reported in : [1983]53CompCas269(AP)

..... previous state of the law would be permissible for the purpose of aiding in the construction of a new statute if any provision therein is of doubtful import : bank of england v. vagliano brothers [1891] ac 107 robinson v. canadian pacific railway company [1892] ac 481 and mersey docks v. cameron [1865] 11 hlj 443 ..... understood the scope of the application involving nothing more than determination of the quantum of compensation and for the payment of the same.78. executive construction.--the construction placed by the executive, the rule-making authority on provisions of the act while giving effect to the same by making a rule like rule 514 ..... chapter ii with licensing of drivers of motor vehicles. chapter iii with registration of motor vehicles. chapter iv with control of transport vehicles. chapter v with construction, equipment and maintenance of motor vehicles. chapter vi with control of traffic. chapter viii with insurance of motor vehicles against third party risks. chapter ix with .....

Tag this Judgment!

Dec 13 1978 (HC)

Venkateswara Stainless Steel Wire Industries, Hyderabad Vs. Chief Cont ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Reported in : 1988(34)ELT49(AP)

..... so, it is liable to be rejected.' in fernandez. state of mysore (4 supra) where the supreme court was concerned with regard to the rejection of a tender called for construction of a masonry dam on the ground that it was contrary to the public works department code, after holding that the code had no statutory force, their lordships held as .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //