Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: metro railways construction of works act 1978 chapter iii acquisition Sorted by: old Page 6 of about 3,274 results (0.150 seconds)

Sheela R. Vs. the Corporation of Thiruvananthapuram and ors.

Court : Kerala

Reported in : 2009(16)KLJ870

..... set aside. but the ist respondent is restrained from taking any further steps against the 3rd respondent based on the findings regarding the unauthorised construction made in deviation from the approved plan, provided the 3rd respondent submits proper application for regularisation accompanied with plan and drawings along with remittance of ..... to whether regularisation can be granted or refused. while considering a question as to whether a provisional order issued for demolition of the unauthorised construction need be confirmed or not, the secretary is not expected to arrive at any conclusion regarding regularisation, without there being any such request submitted ..... of the above quoted provisions it is evident that a comprehensive scheme is provided to deal with applications for regularizing an authorized or deviated constructions. therefore the question mooted for consideration is as to whether a decision permitting regularization can be taken by the secretary, without complying with the .....

Vora Towers Welfare Association Vs. Janatha Industrial Foundry Works a ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Hyderabad

..... several defects as sub-paragraphs (a) to (p), they did not take trouble to co-relate those grievances to the corresponding terms in the construction agreement as no construction agreement between the promoter and the individual flat owner has been filed in this case. however some of those grievances are capable of being shown ..... was tailored to ensure, inter alia, vestiture of the ownership of the flat in the person, who contracts with a promoter absolutely in terms of the construction agreement as fortified by the act, rules and the formulations thereunder. unfortunately this intendment suffered and still stands crippled from myriad of disorders of a grave ..... applicable in the matter. the rights and liabilities as also mutual obligations between a builder (technically called promoter) under the a.p. apartments (promotion of construction and ownership) act, 1987 and the rules thereunder (hereinafter called for brevity the act and the rules) are marked to be principally governed by the said .....

Mrf United Workers Union Rep. by Its General Secretary Vs. Government ...

Court : Chennai

Reported in : (2009)IVLLJ685Mad

..... to be read into them in the absence of enacted domestic law occupying the field when there is no inconsistency between them. it is now an accepted rule of judicial construction that regard must be had to international conventions and norms for construing domestic law when there is no inconsistency between them and there is a void in the domestic law ..... for the petitioner union has drawn our attention to the judgment of the apex court in visaka v. state of rajasthan : 1997 (6) scc 241 to submit that in judicial construction regard must be had to international conventions and norms. similar is the view in apparel export promotion council v. a.k. chopra : air 1999 sc 625 (see para-28 of .....

Subhas Ranjan Ghosal Vs. the Howrah Municipal Corporation and ors.

Court : Kolkata

..... . mr chatterjee, counsel for the petitioner, assails the decision saying that the borough committee had no jurisdiction to give the decision; that the unauthorised constructions could not be legalized; and that the decision is unreasoned and vitiated by total non-application of mind and extraneous considerations. ms. mukherjee, counsel ..... , submits that materials forming part of the records supplied to her would show that the petitioner cannot be considered a person aggrieved by the unauthorised constructions; that the commissioner, competent to give decision in the proceedings initiated on the basis of the petitioner's complaint, delegated his statutory power to ..... the proceedings initiated on the basis of the petitioner's complaint that the private respondents are jointly and severally responsible for erection of the unauthorised constructions at the premises in question. the parties shall be given reasonable opportunity to adduce evidence in proof of their respective cases. after giving .....

Rajinder Kishan Gupta and anr. Vs. Union of India and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

..... was challenged before the high court which ended in dismissal. as raised before the high court, it was contended before us that in view of the metro railways (construction of works) act, 1978, the respondents are not permitted to invoke urgency provision under the land acquisition act which deprived the appellants from participating in the ..... goel for dda.5) main contentions:i) when the acquisition of the land is for dmrc and when there is a specific act, namely, the metro railways (construction of works) act, 1978 whether the authorities are justified in invoking the urgency provision in the land acquisition act by dispensing enquiry under section 5a of the ..... enquiry under section 5a. the metro railways act (no. 33 of 1978) was enacted by the parliament to provide for the construction of works relating to metro railways in the metropolitan cities. chapter iii of the said act deals with `acquisition'. it is not .....

Rakesh Kumar Srivastava and Others Vs. State of U.P. and Others

Court : Allahabad

..... posts in the mandi parishad. according to the petitioners' counsel, petitioners were engaged as work charge/muster roll/on consolidated pay under the contingency limit in various construction divisions of the rajya krishi utpadan mandi parishad. 2. it has been submitted on behalf of the petitioners that in mandi parishad there are three categories of ..... . 2353(ss) of 1999; pawan kumar srivastava and others vs. state of u.p. and others, counsel for the petitioners submitted that the deputy director, construction sent an information on 5.2.1998 to the headquarters indicating therein that work charge, muster roll and fixed pay employees working in the division were within 2% ..... that it is incumbent upon the authorities to appoint any number of persons on any event because the work is being done through contract basis as the construction division is having own strength of regular employees, whose salary is charged to the establishment head whereas persons engaged on daily wages, their wages are .....

Chhattisgarh State Power Holding Co. Ltd, Chhattisgarh and Another Vs. ...

Court : Appellate Tribunal for Electricity APTEL

..... the inspection report dated 18.3.2009 conducted by the appellant also disclosed the correct position that two connections, one for start-up power and the other for construction power existed in the premise of the respondent-1 and were being used for respective purposes. d) at no point of time the appellant had taken any ..... the state commission. (ii) the factors considered by the state commission in deciding that there was no misuse of start-up power connection by respondent-1 for construction purposes are as under: a) the start-up power connection was given to the respondent-1 after following proper procedure. respondent-1 in para 5 of the ..... construction power hv-6 general purpose non-industrial tariff is applicable whereas for start-up power the applicable tariff is hv-8. the relevant extracts for hv-6 and hv-8 categories from the tariff order are as under: 6.3.6 hv-6: general purpose non- industrial 1. applicability this tariff is applicable for supply to establishment like railways .....

Greater Hyderabad Municipal Employees

Court : Andhra Pradesh

..... 'independent engineer', who is a third party, shall be the nodal person for supervision and monitoring of compliance by concessionaire with respect to the construction requirements and o&m requirements, more particularly to undertake, perform, carry out the duties, responsibilities, services and activities set forth in the bid ..... burden on the administration and lead to increased and unbudgeted expenditure. ( 23. ) the same view has been reiterated in asia foundation and construction ltd. v. trafalgar house construction (i) ltd., (1997) 1 scc 738, the court observing that judicial review of contractual transactions by government bodies is permissible to prevent ..... respondent invested crores of rupees to prepare infrastructure to remove and process garbage as per the statutory provisions. the basic infrastructure has to be constructed for disposal of garbage without spoiling the land and environment by investing huge amounts. considering various aspects of the project, its technical and .....

M/S. Larsen and Toubro Ltd. and Another Vs. Union of India and Others

Court : Delhi

..... rules cannot be tested while contrasting the provisions of this act with other states act. in that case, the facts were that the landt was permitted to assign parts of construction work to the sub-contractors and the sub-contractors were the registered dealers. the sub-contractors purchased goods and chattel like bricks, cement etc. and supplied and erected equipment such ..... :- ordinarily unless there is a contract to the contrary, in the case of works contract the property in the goods used in the construction of a building passes to the owner of the land on which the building is constructed, when the goods or materials used re incorporated in the building. therefore, even in the case of works contracts, it would depend .....

Village Panchayat, Calangute Vs. the Additional Director of Panchayat- ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

..... appellant had entertained the complaint made by local residents, revoked occupancy certificate and also cancelled the permission granted to the company for raising construction. the resolution cancelling the permission was recalled apparently because the rules of natural justice had not been followed. thereafter, the sarpanch issued notice ..... is not only entrusted with the duty to implement the programme of welfare schemes and other development works, but also stop any unauthorised construction erected in the panchayat area. section 66 which regulates erection of buildings within panchayat area empowers it and/or the sarpanch to take ..... responsibilities of village panchayati. general functions:(1) preparation of annual plans for the development of the panchayat area. (7) demolition of unauthorised construction. viii. drinking water: (1) construction, repairs and maintenance of drinking water well, tanks and ponds.(2) prevention and control of water pollution. (3) maintenance of rural water .....