Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: metro railways amendment act 2009 section 6 amendment of section 1 Page 1 of about 203,426 results (1.067 seconds)

Mar 19 2015 (HC)

P.N.Kunjumon Vs. State of Kerala

Court : Kerala

..... the committee members (headed by him). it is obvious that the meeting was convened to avoid any further action. section 29 of the act has been amended by the kerala co-operative societies (amendment) act, 2013 by adding sub w.p(c) no.16166 of 2013-u11sections 3 to 5 to the said section. they are extracted hereunder ..... body meeting within the stipulated time. therefore, it is contended that the omission to hold the annual general body meeting itself is a grave omission under the amendment act that justifies the impugned action. apart from the above, there are other irregularities in the manner of functioning of the society as evident from the irregularities itemised ..... w.p(c) no.16166 of 2013-u5at least once in a year. the said provision has been amended by the kerala co-operative societies (amendment) act, 2013, that came into force on 14.02.2013. as per the amended provision, a disqualification has also been enacted to the members of the board for not convening the annual general .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jun 26 2012 (HC)

State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep. by the District Collector Vs. Special Co ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

..... were omitted. even before it was brought into force by the central government by issuing a notification under section 1(2) thereof, the parliament again enacted 2002 cpc amendment act. 1999 amendment act was challenged in salem advocate bar assn. (i) v union of india (2009) 3 scc 511). a division bench of the supreme court appointed an advisory ..... the special court. indeed, applying the well settled principles which were interpretatively read into order vi rule 17 as it existed prior to 1999 and 2002 amendment acts were considered and the amendment was rejected. therefore, we do not feel persuaded by the argument of sri k.bal chand that the impugned order suffers from error only on that ..... (2) saved, rules 17 and 18 of order vi in their application in respect of pleadings filed before the commencement of section 16 of 1999 amendment act. so to say, the amendments sought prior to 06.6.2002 can be construed by the court without applying the proviso to rule 17 of order vi. what is the effect .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 18 2016 (HC)

G. Ramachar and Others Vs. The State Of Karnataka, Rep. By Its Chief S ...

Court : Karnataka

..... .5-00 lakhs or more than that; in respect of transfer of property as per sale) 8) sec.192a, 192b and 192c of karnataka land revenue (amendment) act, 2007; (to be made as the land in not involving to prohibition of alienation i.e. for non agricultural purpose of agricultural land and without government land). the ..... hon'ble supreme court in the case of state of rajasthan vs. basant nahata [2005 (12) scc 77], when the rajasthan legislature had amended the act incorporating section 22a, which is in pari materia with the amendment act of the karnataka legislature. the impugned circular dated 06/04/2009, which is made on the strength of section 22a of the ..... amendment act, is also illegal, as section 22a of the amendment act of state of rajasthan has been struck down and that section is in pari materia with the amendment act passed by the karnataka legislature. it is therefore, contended that circular dated 06/04/2009 .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 17 2014 (HC)

Ram Gopal Vs. Tara Chand Dubey Judgement Given By: Hon'ble Shri Ju ...

Court : Madhya Pradesh

..... of the appellate authority to initiate suo moto powers under sub section (2) was in the matter of an order of confiscation only, but subsequently by the indian forest amendment act, 2009 brought into force w.e.f. 27.03.2010 vide annexure p-7. sub section (2) and (6) of section 52-a, it is ..... power and that in view of amended provision, the appeal was maintainable and the appellate authority and the revisional authority have not committed any error in rejecting the objection of the applicant.8. i have heard learned counsel for the parties at length and perused the record. section 52-a of the indian forest act, 1927 as is applicable in the ..... period stipulated therein and the explanation to this section permits excluding the period for obtaining certified copy. sub-section (2) of section 52-a, as is stood prior to amendment brought into force before 27.3.2010, contemplate a provision where the appellate authority referred to in sub section (1) was also authorized to initiate suo-motu action in .....

Tag this Judgment!

May 18 2009 (HC)

Hemant Kumar Vs. State of U.P. and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Reported in : 2009(3)AWC3096

..... .r. against 37 named and 150 unnamed persons under sections 147, 148, 149, 307, 332, 353, 188, 323, 504 and 506, i.p.c. read with section 7 criminal law amendment act which was registered as case crime no. 414a/09 in the police station, banpur.7. it is urged by the counsel for the petitioner that the impugned order of suspension ..... .r. lodged by the villagers.13. the duty of the police officer is to protect the public and not indulge in 'rahjani', dacoity or for extracting money or any other act against law. from the above there appears to be no reason for the villagers to have intervened in the matter. the injured from gun shots alleged to be fired by .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jun 13 2011 (HC)

Aryan Ispat and Power Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Union of India and ors.

Court : Orissa

..... as may be relevant it is of the opinion that it is necessary to safeguard the interest of revenue specify by notification in the official gazette. amendment to section 37 by the act of parliament received the assent of the president on 08.05.2010. the operational period of restriction being from 26.07.2010 limiting it to ..... c.e.(nt). 4. while the matter stood thus, the finance bill, 2010 was placed in the parliament on 26.02.2010 introducing an amendment to section 37 of the central excise act authorizing to make rules to provide for withdrawal of facilities or imposition of restrictions in case of evasion of duty or misuse of cenvat credit. ..... provisions of section 37(2) are not restrictive. 11. admittedly, in the present case by the financial bill, 2010, an amendment was brought to sub-section (2) of section 37 of the act, after clause (xiii) and the following clause was inserted which runs as follows: (xiiia) provide for withdrawal of facilities or imposition of restrictions (including .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 26 2013 (HC)

Tata Projects Limited Vs. Gnanaprakasam

Court : Chennai

..... has not been considered properly. as the learned arbitrator has found the termination bad in law, the appeal filed by the appellant cannot be sustained. the amendments have been made by pressurising the first respondent. he also submitted that adequate compensation has not been awarded for the materials supplied by him. therefore, the ..... no.4/358, 9th cross street, kapaleaswarar nagar south, neelankarai, chennai-41. .. respondents o.s.a.no.425 of 2012 -------------------- mr.gnanaprakasam, son of p.veerabadra mudaliar, railway, twad contractor, ap86, 7th street, af block, 11th main road, anna nagar, chennai-40. .. appellant vs. 1.m/s tata projects limited, 'mithona towers", 1-7 ..... single judge, by a common order dated 30.03.2012, was pleased to dismiss both the petitions filed under section 34 of the arbitration and conciliation act, 1996. challenging the said common order, the present original side appeals have been filed by both the parties.8. the learned counsel appearing for the .....

Tag this Judgment!

Feb 22 2010 (HC)

Tarun Mehta and ors. Etc. Etc. Vs. State of Raj. and ors.

Court : Rajasthan

..... notary forthwith under the said certificate of authorisation.24. it is to be noticed that as per sub-section (2) of section 5 as it was existing before the amendment introduced by act 36 of 1999 w.e.f. 17.12.99 substituting the word 'shall' employed therein by word 'may' , the entitlement of a person appointed as a notary public ..... an obligation to renew the certificate of practise of any notary for a period of five years on receipt of the application in the prescribed fee. but after the amendment introduced by act 36 of 1999 w.e.f. 17.12.99 , the word 'shall' employed in sub-section (2) of section 5 stands substituted by the word 'may' and therefore, ..... jangid, learned additional advocate general submitted that vide notification dated 24.2.09 issued by the central government in exercise of the power conferred by section 15 of the act, some material amendments have been made in the rules which have come into force w.e.f. 1.3.09 and thereby a complete new procedure has been laid down for the .....

Tag this Judgment!

Sep 07 2012 (HC)

Malad Kokil Co-operative Housing Society Ltd. and Another Vs. the Mode ...

Court : Mumbai

..... section 7(1)(ii) of mofa. it has further been observed, that the obligation is strengthened by insertion of sub-section (1a) in section 4 of mofa by maharashtra amendment act 36/86. the apex court has also held that as per clauses 3 and 4 of the rules, which are declared to be statutory and mandatory by the legislature, the ..... in section 7(1)(ii) of mofa. that obligation is strengthened by insertion of sub-section (1a) in section 4 of mofa by maharashtra amendment act 36/86. therefore, every agreement between the promoter and the flat taker shall comply with the prescribed form v. it may be noted that, in that prescribed form, ..... have agreed to take the flats. (emphasis supplied) the words, "or construct any additional structures", were deleted by the amendment vide maharashtra act 36 of 1986. by the said amendment, section 7a was added and it provides that the amendment to section 7 would apply retrospectively and it provided that it shall be deemed to be effective as if the said clause .....

Tag this Judgment!

Sep 07 2012 (HC)

Malad Kokil Co-operative Housing Society Ltd. and Another Vs. the Mode ...

Court : Mumbai

..... section 7(1)(ii) of mofa. it has further been observed, that the obligation is strengthened by insertion of sub-section (1a) in section 4 of mofa by maharashtra amendment act 36/86. the apex court has also held that as per clauses 3 and 4 of the rules, which are declared to be statutory and mandatory by the legislature, the ..... in section 7(1)(ii) of mofa. that obligation is strengthened by insertion of sub-section (1a) in section 4 of mofa by maharashtra amendment act 36/86. therefore, every agreement between the promoter and the flat taker shall comply with the prescribed form v. it may be noted that, in that prescribed form, ..... have agreed to take the flats. (emphasis supplied) the words, "or construct any additional structures", were deleted by the amendment vide maharashtra act 36 of 1986. by the said amendment, section 7a was added and it provides that the amendment to section 7 would apply retrospectively and it provided that it shall be deemed to be effective as if the said clause .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //