Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: metro railways amendment act 2009 section 6 amendment of section 1 Page 3 of about 203,426 results (1.203 seconds)

Apr 10 2013 (HC)

Ramlal Kol Vs. Moti Kashyap @ Motilal

Court : Madhya Pradesh

..... that it was only after the year ::18. :: election petition no.20/2009 1976 (in which by virtue of the scheduled castes and scheduled tribes orders (amendment) act, 1976, majhi was recognized as a scheduled tribe in respect of the whole state of madhya pradesh) that the respondent had started claiming status of a member ..... scheduled tribes in relation to the erstwhile state of madhya pradesh and by virtue of entry 9 to the schedule to the scheduled castes and scheduled tribes orders (amendment) act, 1956, ::2. :: election petition no.20/2009 majhi was recognized as a scheduled tribe in the state of vindhya pradesh which, ultimately, became part of ..... a new state of madhya pradesh formed by the state reorganisation act, 1956. however, it was with effect from 27th july 1977, that majhi was notified, under the scheduled castes and scheduled tribes orders (amendment) act 1976, as a scheduled tribe throughout the new state. (ii) in the years 1980, 1985, .....

Tag this Judgment!

Sep 23 2013 (SC)

State of Rajasthan Vs. A.N. Mathur and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

..... the assent of the chancellor, i.e. the governor of the state of rajasthan is not received by the university, the amended statute would not come into force.16. the aforestated provisions in section 39 of the act are of vital importance because the legislature wanted to have some control over the university, though the university is an autonomous ..... is received and notified by the vice-chancellor.2. any statutes may be amended or repealed by the board with the assent of the chancellor.3. all statutes made under this act shall be published in the official gazette. 13. section 38 of the act clearly indicates that the university can provide for any matter connected with the affairs ..... the chancellor for his assent and the amended statute would come into force only after the assent is received and notified by the vice-chancellor of the university. the chancellor, as per the provisions of section 2(h) read with section 8 of the act, is the governor of the state of rajasthan.15. according to the .....

Tag this Judgment!

Nov 26 2009 (FN)

Ba (Nigeria) (Fc) (Respondent) Vs. Secretary of State for the Home Dep ...

Court : UK Supreme Court

..... a human rights claim" for the purposes of section 92(4)(a). like lloyd lj, i would not draw an inference either way from the amendment of section 113 by section 12 of the 2006 act as it is not yet in force. it is an elementary principle, however, that the words of a statute should be construed in the context of ..... require him to leave the united kingdom would be unlawful under section 6 of the human rights act 1998 (c. 42) (public authority not to act contrary to convention) as being incompatible with his convention rights" section 12 of the immigration, asylum and nationality act 2006 amends those definitions prospectively by adding in each case a provision that the expression: "does not include a .....

Tag this Judgment!

Oct 17 2014 (HC)

Shaileshkumar Nathalal Modh and Others Vs. Chaudhary Takahatben Keshar ...

Court : Gujarat

..... a view to curb menace of the litigation being prolonged felt necessity to circumvent same. and with a view to achieve this object, amended c.p.c. vide code of civil procedure (amendment) act, 2002 adding proviso to order 6 rule 17 of the code. 9. on bare perusal of this proviso, it is evident that ..... evoked much controversy/hesitation all over the country and also leading to boycott of courts and therefore, by the civil procedure code (amendment) act, 2002, provision has been restored by recognising the power of the court to grant amendment, however, with certain limitation which is contained in the new proviso added to the rule. the details furnished below will ..... his pleadings. 42. it is to be noted that the provisions of order 6 rule 17 cpc have been substantially amended by the cpc (amendment) act, 2002. 43. under the proviso no application for amendment shall be allowed after the trial has commenced, unless in spite of due diligence the matter could not be raised before the commencement .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 30 2016 (HC)

Yogesh Dutt Vs. The State of Tamilnadu through Thiru S. Krishnamoorthy ...

Court : Chennai Madurai

..... and the complaint was launched only on 02.01.2009 after expiry of the shelf life of the insecticide. in the counter, the complainant pleads that a curative amendment has to be brought into enactment, which is no doubt laudable, but there should also be a curative antidote, administered to bureaucrats, like the complainant to prevent ..... and instituted the complaint only on 02.01.2009, which is after the expiry date. therefore, the petitioner lost his valuable right under section 24(3) of the act, 1968 for re-analysis. 5. the complainant has filed a counter expatiating on the harm that would befall the society, if misbranded insecticides are allowed to be in ..... reply dated 24.01.2008, he expressed his intention in no uncertain terms to adduce evidence to contradict the test report in terms of section 24(3) of the act, 1968, by getting the referee sample reanalysed by the central insecticides laboratory, faridabad. iii) admittedly, the complainant obtained sanction on 19.09.2008 and filed the .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jul 25 2018 (HC)

Giriappa S/O Venkat Das and Anr Vs. The Deputy Commissioner & Ors

Court : Karnataka Kalaburagi

..... persons who are in unauthorized occupation and cultivation of land should make an application within six months from the date of commencement of the karnataka land revenue (amendment) act, 1990, which has come into force on 14.04.1990.4. however, the applications which are seen in the original records, do not discloses the date as to ..... file maintained in the office of the revenue department and there being no reference to application being filed in the manner prescribed under section 94-a(4) of the act and there being no reference of fees being paid, the said application being inserted in the records of office of the tahsildar and the same was placed before the ..... is mentioned for it, is kept blank in the applications. the relevant provision of section 94-a(4) of the act would also indicate that an application shall be filed along with such fees as prescribed under the act. in the original file there is no reference to any amount being paid towards fee. when learned counsel for the .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jul 28 2009 (HC)

Maharashtra Academy of Engineering and Educational Research Vs. Direct ...

Court : Mumbai

Reported in : [2009]319ITR399(Bom)

..... november 2007 opposing the renewal of approval of the petitioner trust under section 10(23c)(vi) of the act. there are various other facts which need not be set out including those which have been incorporated pursuant to the amendment allowed by this court by an order dated 26th march 2009.7. though various contentions have been raised ..... (23c) of section 10 read with sub-rule (3) of rule 2ca, the central board of direct taxes hereby authorises the following chief commissioners or directors generals to act as prescribed authority for the purposes of sub-clauses (vi) and (via) of clause (23c) of section 10 in relation to any university or other educational institution or ..... under sub-clauses (vi) and (via) of clause (23c) of section 10 shall be the central board of direct taxes constituted under the central board of revenue act, 1963 for applications received prior to 3rd day of april 2001.provided that in case of applications received prior to 3rd day of april 2001 where no order has .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 23 2010 (HC)

Harshpriya Construction (P) Ltd. Vs. the Inspector General of Registra ...

Court : Orissa

Reported in : 109(2010)CLT772,2010(I)OLR760

..... instrument to the stamp collector was not at all necessary for deciding the claim of undervaluation.7. sub-section (1) of section 47-a of the stamp (orissa amendment) act specifically uses the expression 'refer the matter' and does not speak of referring or sending the instrument itself to the collector. the aforesaid decision of the kerala high ..... obligation on the registering officer to return the registered instrument to the person concerned on completion of registration whereas section 47-a of the stamp (orissa amendment) act speaks about reference of a dispute by the registering officer to the stamp collector when he has reason to believe that the market value of the property ..... retain possession of the original registered instrument (sale deed) where it raises a dispute in terms of section 47-a of the indian stamp (orissa amendment) act with regard to the stamp duty payable on such instrument.2. the facts leading to the formulation of the aforesaid question have been depicted in the .....

Tag this Judgment!

Dec 24 2010 (HC)

Niva Halder and ors. Vs. the State of West Bengal and ors.

Court : Kolkata Appellate

..... was handed over to the refugee rehabilitation department on 28th november, 1990.i) after the lapse of act-ii of 1948, the case has been converted to land acquisition act-i of 1894 under the provision of land acquisition (west bengal amendment) act, 1997.j) one rita dey and others filed a writ-petition being w.p. no. 79 ..... a developer authorized by some of them to deal with the government to retrieve the land through negotiation.m) after promulgation of the 1997 amendment of the west bengal land (requisition and acquisition) act, 1948, the respondents had no legal authority to continue to hold the land of the writ-petitioners and the respondents are required to de ..... also taken decision not to acquire the land, in view of the repeal of the west bengal land (requisition and acquisition) act, 1948, there is no scope for further continuation of the requisition after the amendment of the year 1997.9. we, therefore, find that the learned single judge was quite justified in passing direction upon .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 29 2011 (HC)

Sumita Pradipkumar Dixit Vs. Smt.Pushpadevi G. Makharia and ors.

Court : Mumbai

..... the apex court in the case of sumesh singh (supra) has further observed thus: "12. by reason of section 16(2)(b) of the code of civil procedure (amendment) act, 2002, the amendments carried out therein shall only apply to in respect of the suits which were filed thereafter. (seen state bank of hyderabad v. town municipal council (2007) 1 scc 765 ..... 7.2002. learned counsel further submits that the view taken by shinde j. and deshmukh j. does not notice provisions of sub-section (2) of section 16 of the amendment act, 2002 so also the judgments of the apex court in the cases of state bank of hyderabad and sumesh singh (supra) and will therefore have to be held as per ..... in the case of nasiruddin & ors. v. sita ram agarwal, (2003) 2 scc 577.6. shri dani, learned counsel appointed as amicus curiae, submits that if section 16 of amendment act, 2002 is read as whole and the clauses thereof are read in harmony with each other, it would reveal that the matters which have been saved by clauses (a) and .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //