Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: metro railways amendment act 2009 section 6 amendment of section 1 Court: chhattisgarh Page 1 of about 215 results (0.120 seconds)

May 05 2009 (HC)

Dr. Abhishek Mishra and ors. Vs. State of Chhattisgarh and ors.

Court : Chhattisgarh

Reported in : AIR2009Chh58

..... been made eligible for admission against the state quota seats available for admission to post graduate course. the grievance of the petitioners is that prior to amendment, the candidates, who had passed mbbs from medical college situated in the chhattisgarh and recognized by the medical council of india, were also eligible for admission ..... right to seek admission against the state quota for post-graduate course. the state government in exercise of powers conferred under section 4 of the act, 2002 was well within its right to regulate admission to pg course in the medical colleges/universities in the state of chhattisgarh. the constitutional validity ..... sub-section (1) of section 4 of the chhattisgarh chikitsa mahavidyalaya ke snatkottar pathyakramon main pravesh adhiniyam, 2002 (no. 28 of 2002), (for short 'the act, 2002') made the chhattisgarh medical snatkottar pravesh pariksha niyam, 2004, vide notification dated 24th april, 2004. rule 6 of the above rules deals with eligibility criteria .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 04 2016 (HC)

M.L. Dewangan Vs. State of Chhattisgarh, Through its Secretary, Co-ope ...

Court : Chhattisgarh

..... (scc p. 361, para13) 13 . . at the outset, we would say that it is not possible for this court to give any directions for amending the act or the statutory rules. it is for parliament to amend the act and the rules. 16. in state of u.p. v. jeet s. bisht ((2007) 6 scc 586), this court held that issuing any such direction ..... ) 5 scc 294), their lordships observed as under:- 19. at the outset, we would say that it is not possible for this court to give any directions for amending the act or the statutory rules. it is for parliament to amend the act and the rules. it is also established law that no direction can be given, which would be contrary to the ..... statement of law rendered by the supreme court in the aforesaid judgments, this court is of the considered opinion that power of the registrar, cooperative societies to frame/amend the rule under section 55(1) of the act of 1960 is legislative in character and no writ of mandamus can be issued to the registrar, cooperative societies to .....

Tag this Judgment!

Aug 23 2007 (HC)

Mukesh Singh Thakur Vs. State of Chhattisgarh and ors.

Court : Chhattisgarh

Reported in : AIR2008Chh4; 2008(1)MPHT82(CG)

..... list i and entry 25 of list iiientry 11 of list ii was deleted and entry 25 of list iii was amended with effect from 3-1-1976 as a result of the constitution 42nd amendment act of 1976. the present entry 25 in the concurrent list is as follows:25. education, including technical education, medical ..... notification dated 20th april, 2007, the same cannot be altered or modified even by gazette notification to prejudice the rights of the petitioners as the subsequent amendment or alteration in the qualification would disentitle the petitioners to participate in the counseling after having passed in the written examination and found place in the merit ..... vides for making rules and regulations to carry out the provisions of the act, 1993. the n.c.t.e. in exercise of its powers under section 32(2) of the act, 1993 framed regulations, styled as 'national council for teacher education (recognition, norms and procedure) (amendment) regulations, 2006 (for short 'the regulations, 2006')' published in the .....

Tag this Judgment!

Dec 19 2006 (HC)

Mohd. Akbar Etc. Etc. Vs. State of Chhattisgarh and anr.

Court : Chhattisgarh

Reported in : AIR2007Chh39; 2007(2)MPHT1

..... shall hold elections as early as possible. the ordinance was subsequently replaced by chhattisgarh co-operative societies (amendment) act 2004 (hereinafter referred to as the amendment act). constitutional validity of this ordinance as also the amendment act is under challenge in these writ petitions. all these petitions have been heard together and are being decided ..... provisions have been declared as ultra vires mainly on the two contentions. firstly on the comparison with the earlier provisions in force prior to substitution by amendment act no. 14 of 1990, which provides a provision that 'if the outgoing committee of the society has resolved and requested the registrar to hold election ..... for removal of doubt it is hereby declared that the term of the committee continuing in office at the commencement of the madhya pradesh cooperative societies (amendment) act, 1990 by virtue of the first proviso to sub-section (8) as it stood immediately before such commencement, shall come to an end.(10 .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jun 25 2005 (HC)

Mohammed Akbar Vs. Registrar, Co-operative Societies and ors.

Court : Chhattisgarh

Reported in : 2006(1)MPHT86(CG)

..... apply to the facts of this case. the first submission of mr. shrivastava that the registrar, co-operative societies could not invoke section 80 of the act introduced by the amendment act of 2003 to review the order dated 25-11-2002, therefore, has no merit.15. the next question, which arises for decision in these writ petitions ..... provides that the registrar, co-operative societies could not exercise the power of review in respect of an order which had been passed prior to the commencement of the amendment act of 2003. in support of this submission, he relied on the decision of the supreme court in b.p. andra v. superintendent, central jail, tihar reported in ..... of review was vested in the registrar, co-operative societies only in the year 2003 under section 80 of the chhattisgarh cooperative societies (amendment) act, 2003 but by 2003 when the said amendment act came into force the orders dated 22-10-2002 and 25-11-2002 had become final. he submitted that the said section 80 conferring .....

Tag this Judgment!

Dec 17 2009 (HC)

Sunita Jaiswal (Smt.) Vs. State of Chhattisgarh and ors.

Court : Chhattisgarh

Reported in : 2010(1)MPHT109(CG)

..... , observed as under:17. we shall first deal with the plea regarding alternative remedy as raised by the appellant state. except for a period when article 226 was amended by the constitution (forty- second amendment) act, 1976, the power relating to alternative remedy has been considered to be a rule of self-imposed limitation. it is essentially a rule of policy, convenience and .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jun 18 2001 (HC)

Gurumukh Singh Hora Vs. State of Chhattisgarh and ors.

Court : Chhattisgarh

Reported in : 2001(4)MPHT79(CG)

..... v. filip tiago de gama of vedam vasco de gama, (1990) 1 scc 277, the supreme court while considering the purpose of incorporating transitional provision in any act or amendment observed that the purpose is to clarify as to when and how the operative parts of the enactment are to take effect. the transitional provisions generally are intended to ..... made an application for vacation of the interim order. on 12-4-2001 itself, the respondent no. 7 also made an application for vacation of the stay order. the amendment application filed by the petitioner was replied by the respondent nos. 6, 8 and 9 and, by respondent no. 7. the matter came up for hearing before the ..... 2001 and was directed to be listed for hearing on 2-3-2001. on 3-1-2001, the petitioner made an application for amendment of the petition. this court had earlier directed that the proposed amendment appears to be as regards interpretation of certain provisions of law, therefore, the same will be taken into consideration at the time of .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 23 2015 (HC)

Yadram (Dead) Through LRs. and Others Vs. The State of Chhattisgarh an ...

Court : Chhattisgarh

..... take effect from the date they are issued and not from any prior date. in the present case, period of application of the amendment has already been mentioned in the amending act, therefore the amending act would be operative for the transaction made between 2-10-1959 till 24-10-1980 and not prior to 2-10-1959. 6. ..... aboriginal tribe which was transferred by fraud. (1) every person who on the date of commencement of the madhya pradesh land revenue code (amendment) act, 1980 (hereinafter referred to as the amendment act of 1980) is in possession of agricultural land which belonged to a member of a tribe which has been declared to be an aboriginal tribe ..... bench to answer the following referred question of law: - "whether the provision of section 170-b of the chhattisgarh land revenue code, 1959 inserted vide m.p. amendment act no.15 of 1980 with effect from 24-12-1980, are applicable in respect of transactions prior to commencement of chhattisgarh land revenue code, 1959, involving transfer / .....

Tag this Judgment!

Apr 30 2007 (HC)

Raipur Dugth Sangh (Sahkari) Maryadit Vs. Additional Commissioner, Com ...

Court : Chhattisgarh

Reported in : (2007)10VST763(NULL)

..... where any registered dealer on the occurrence of any event referred to in section 32, or in pursuance of any other provision of the act makes an application for amendment of his registration certificate or makes an application for specification of any goods in his registration certificate by way of raw material or incidental ..... counsel for the petitioner would submit that under rule 11a of the rules the registering authority/sales tax officer after application filed by the petitioner/assessee for amendment of registration certificate is rejected, it is mandatory on their part to communicate the same to the petitioner/assessee. since that has not been done, ..... /assessee, the application filed on february 12, 1986, is deemed to have been allowed and the registration certificate issued earlier is deemed to have been amended. therefore, the assessing authority and the revisional authority were not justified in refusing to grant the relief of exemption/reduced rate of tax to the petitioner .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jul 09 2009 (HC)

Thobhani Auto Mobiles Vs. State of Chhattisgarh,

Court : Chhattisgarh

Reported in : 2009(4)MPHT48(CG)

..... ., observed as under:17. we shall first deal with the plea regarding alternative remedy as raised by the appellant state. except for a period when article 226 was amended by the constitution (forty-second amendment) act,1976, the power relating to alternative remedy has been considered to be a rule of self-imposed limitation. it is essentially a rule of policy, convenience and ..... liters of kerosene oil lifted by the petitioner under public distribution system, has been embezzled. thus, this petition.3. shri kesharwani, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that aforesaid act of the respondent no. 2 is against the principles of audi alteram partem. further, the respondents have not complied with rule 10 of the madhya pradesh kerosene dealer licensing order .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //