Skip to content
How to use Narrow results with filters
  1. Run a keyword search first to load the results page.
  2. Select Supreme Court, a High Court, or tribunal on the left.
  3. Optionally filter by decision year to focus on recent or historical cases.

Mentioned - Judgment Search Results

Pulse this search Log in to save a LexPulse alert for this search

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Aug 14 2014

as Mentioned in the Site Plan Situated in Jalalabad Vs. Ram Lal and Ot ...

Court: Punjab and Haryana

Decided on: Aug-14-2014

to the accuracy and integrity of this document Punjab & Haryana High Court Rs.No.118 of 1991 2 as mentioned in the site plan situated in Jalalabad West, Police Station Jalalabad, Tehsil Fazilka, Distt.Ferozepur with consequential relief of


Aug 04 2023

Mohammed Gafoor Also Known as Abdul Gafoor (Mentioned in the Complaint ...

Court: Kerala

Decided on: Aug-04-2023

B.A.No.4682/23 1IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAMPRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE ZIYAD RAHMAN A.A. TH FRIDAY, THE 4 DAY OF AUGUST 2023 / 13TH SRAVANA, 1945 BAIL APPL. NO. 4682 OF 2023 PETITIONER/S: MOHAMMED GAFOOR...


Sep 26 2022

M.E.Balan, (Wrongly Mentioned as MC Balan), vs State of Kerala

Court: Kerala

Decided on: Sep-26-2022

ASWINA, 1944 CRL.MC NO. 8551 OF 2019 AGAINST THE ORDER/JUDGMENTST 139/2019 OF MUNSIFF-MAGISTRATE COURT, PAYYOLI PETITIONER/ACCUSED: M.E.BALAN, (WRONGLY MENTIONED AS MC BALAN), AGED 73 YEARS, S/O.POKKAN, KAUSTHUBHAM, CHEMMARATHUR, VADAKARA, KOZHIKODE DISTRICT, FORMER PRESIDENT SNDP UNION DEVELOPMENT AND


18-section briefs on any result in this list

Feb 02 2005

Vishram S/O Shripat Wankhede (Wrongly Mentioned in Complaint as Vishra ...

Court: Mumbai

Decided on: Feb-02-2005

Reported in: (2005)107BOMLR1471

J.M.F.C. for reconsideration of the case as against original accused Nos. 2, 3 and 8 for the reasons mentioned in the said judgment. 5. The learned J.M.F.C., on 30/11/2001 had passed the following order; 'Perused the certified


Jul 22 2005

Selvam Antony Marie (incorrectly Mentioned in the E.P. Selvam Marie) a ...

Court: Chennai

Decided on: Jul-22-2005

Reported in: (2005)4MLJ500

Nos. 5, 6, 8, 17 Item No. 2Parties pray that a Final Decree may be passed in terms mentioned above. Parties can possession as per allotment mentioned if they are not already a preliminary decree.'So, it is


Aug 13 2009

Raj Kumar Chaddha Son of Late Sant Ram Wrongly Mentioned in the Compla ...

Court: Patna

Decided on: Aug-13-2009

Matched in: Parties Raj Kumar Chaddha Son of Late Sant Ram Wrongly Mentioned in the Complaint as Advisor Cum Incharge General Manager, H.M.P. Sugar Mills Ltd. and Kripa Shankar Manager, H.M.P. Sugar Mills Ltd. Wrongly Mentioned in the Complaint Case Cane Manager Vs. the State of Bihar and Rajesh Kumar Pandey Son of Late Lalit Mohan Pandey


May 06 2013

“it Is Mentioned in the Complaint That the Father in Law of the Vs. ...

Court: Punjab and Haryana

Decided on: May-06-2013

making misrepresentation. The trial Judge has noted the following facts regarding case of the prosecution :- “It is mentioned in the complaint that the father in law of the complainant Surinder Singh son of Gurmuksh Singh was


Jan 16 2013

“perusal of the File Shows That the Incident Has Been Mentioned as V ...

Court: Punjab and Haryana

Decided on: Jan-16-2013

of which is as under (para 4) :- “Perusal of the file shows that the incident has been mentioned as that of 1.7.2008. Jagdish Kumar, complainant-respondent has alleged that on land measuring 87 Kanals 11 Marlas comprising


Mar 26 2013

“In View of Facts Mentioned Above We Allow these Vs. State of Haryan ...

Court: Punjab and Haryana

Decided on: Mar-26-2013

Court in terms of judgement dated 3.3.2008 allowed the petitions in the following terms:- “In view of facts, mentioned above, we allow these writ petitions and direct the respondents to consider the petitioners and all other Sanskrit


Jul 11 2014

“learned Counsel Inter Alia Contended That Neither His Name Is Menti ...

Court: Punjab and Haryana

Decided on: Jul-11-2014

this document Chandigarh CRM No.M-17993 of 2014 2 “Learned counsel, inter alia, contended that neither his name is mentioned nor any specific role is attributed to the petitioner in the FIR. He has been falsely implicated in


  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »
Loading chart…

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial