Medly - Judgment Search Results
Bd.of Governers in Sup.of Med.Coun.Of(i) Vs. Vydehi Inst.of Med.Sc.and ...
Court: Supreme Court of India
Decided on: Jan-04-2013
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NOS.7755 - 7756 OF 201.BOARD OF GOVERNERS IN SUPERSESSION OF MEDICAL APPELLANTS COUNCIL OF INDIA VERSUS VYDEHI INSTITUTE OF MEDICAL SCIENCES & RESPONDENTS RESEARCH CENTRE...
Rohilkhand Med. Colleg. and Hosp. Bareily Vs. M.C.i and anr
Court: Supreme Court of India
Decided on: Sep-06-2013
REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL ORIGINAL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) NO.585 OF 201.Rohilkhand Medical College & Hospital, Bareilly …. Petitioner Versus Medical Council of India & Another … Respondents JUDGMENT K.S. Radhakrishnan, J.1....
Tvl. Blue Med Surgicals Vs The Assistant Commissioner (ST) (FAC)
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jun-09-2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 09.06.2026CORAMTHE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE SENTHILKUMAR RAMAMOORTHY and W.M.P. No.21036 of 2026 Tvl. Blue Med Surgicals Rep. by its Authorised Signatory Mr. S Murugendran, No, 8/3-B, Palani Street, Ground...
18-section briefs on any result in this list
El Med Imagine Through Its Proprietor Shrikant Gupta Vs. The State of ...
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Feb-03-2017
-1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W. P. (C) No. 7078 of 2016 … EL-MED-IMAGINE through its proprietor Shrikant Gupta, Dhanbad (Jharkhand) ... …Petitioner -V e r s u s- 1. The State...
Executive Engineer, Med. Proj. Dvn. and anr. Vs. Member, Industrial Co ...
Court: Mumbai
Decided on: Oct-29-2007
Reported in: 2008(3)BomCR798; 2008(1)MhLj697
A.B. Chaudhari, J.1. Rule returnable forthwith. Heard finally by consent of the parties.By these two writ petitions, the petitioners have challenged common judgment and order dated 21-1-2002, passed by the Judge, Labour Court, Nagpur and confirmed...
Hissar Med. Diagnostic and Vs. Commr. of Cus.
Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi
Decided on: Mar-12-1998
Reported in: (1998)(101)ELT197TriDel
1. After hearing for some time with reference to the stay applications filed by the applicants, we felt that the main matter itself can be disposed of. Accordingly, amount required to be deposited for hearing the...
Max Med Laboratories Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise
Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Tamil Nadu
Decided on: Jun-08-2006
Reported in: (2006)(110)ECC315
2. Under Notice No. 1/93-CE dated 28.2.1993 (as amended) to the assessee and accordingly demanded duty of Rs. 4,09,168/- from them.They have also imposed equal amount of penalty on them. The demand is in respect of...
Standard Med. and Pharma Vs. Allahabad Bank
Court: DRAT Madras
Decided on: Mar-11-2004
Reported in: IV(2004)BC20
1. The appeal is directed as against the order passed in IA-842/2003 in OA-44712000. The applicant-Bank filed that IA seeking direction to be issued to the respondent for payment of the admitted amount. The PO, DRT,...
California Med. Assn. Vs. Fec
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided on: Jun-26-1981
California Med. Assn. v. FEC - 453 U.S. 182 (1981) U.S. Supreme Court California Med. Assn. v. FEC, 453 U.S. 182 (1981) California Medical Association v. Federal Elections Commission No. 79-1952 Argued January 19, 1981 Decided...
Draegerwerk Ag & Co Kgaa vs.ion Bio Med-I-Care Pvt Ltd
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-26-2019
$~3 * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI EFA(OS) 21/2018 & CM Appl.No.52743/2018 (stay) DRAEGERWERK AG & CO KGAA Through Mr. Arvind Nayar, Sr.Advocate with Mr. Jyoti Kumar Singh, Ms. Shweta Bharti,...
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- Next ›
- Last »
Hover bars for counts · use +/− or drag to zoom · click a bar to filter by year
AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free