Measurement - Judgment Search Results
Synergy Measurement Technologies (P) Ltd & Anr. Vs.srb Instruments Pri ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-04-2017
NEW DELHI $~35 * + O.M.P. (T) (COMM.) 96/2017 & IAs 14175-76/2017 Date of decision:4th December, 2017 SYNERGY MEASUREMENT TECHNOLOGIES (P) LTD & ANR. ........ Petitioners Through: Mr.Sachin Datta, Sr. Adv. with Mr.A.Venkateshwar Rao, Ms.Prity Sharma, Ms.Rijata
Power Measurement Ltd. Vs. U.P. Power Corporation Ltd. and ors.
Court: Allahabad
Decided on: Feb-05-2003
Reported in: 2003(2)AWC1642b
Jagdish Bhalla, J. 1. Petitioner, a foreign Power Measurement Limited company having no office in India, engaged in manufacturing of 0.2S and 0.5S Accuracy Class Energy Meters
Measuring 2711 Kanal 19 Marlas Owned by Gram Panchayat Vs. Indraj Sing ...
Court: Punjab and Haryana
Decided on: Jul-04-2013
from river and forest in respect of land bearing Khewat No.279, Khatoni No.315, CWP No.4763 of 2013 -2- measuring 2711 kanal 19 marlas owned by Gram Panchayat, Badopur-respondent No.6, petitioner has filed the present petition leveling false
18-section briefs on any result in this list
P.S. Measurements and Controls Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Technicom Systems (i) Pvt ...
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Feb-26-2003
Reported in: [2005]124CompCas144(Kar)
are engaged in a similar line of business. The appellant-company manufactures products which are indigenously developed by M/s. Measurements and Controls, a sister concern of the appellant. The telecom equipment manufactured by the appellant are used by
Calcutta Licensed Measurers Bengal Chamber of Commerce Vs. Md. Hossain
Court: Kolkata
Decided on: Nov-29-1968
Reported in: AIR1969Cal378,73CWN491
was held by the Court of Appeal that the County Court Judge proceeded on a wrong principle by measuring the wage earning capacity of the appellant at the date of the accident not perhaps by her average
Festo Measure Industries Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of C. Ex.
Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi
Decided on: May-13-2004
Reported in: (2004)(172)ELT38TriDel
SDR has contended that the scales manufactured by the appellants can be used only for drawing lines and measuring distance between the two points, are classifiable under only sub-heading 9017.90 which covers goods other than those falling
Yuil Measures Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Commr. of Customs
Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi
Decided on: Apr-28-1998
Reported in: (1999)(112)ELT453TriDel
1. In this case, a duty demand of Rs. 2,09,54,801/- has been confirmed against M/s. Yuil Measures India (hereinafter referred to as applicant No.l) and a penalty of Rs.10 lakhs has been imposed upon this
Yuil Measures (i) Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Customs
Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi
Decided on: Aug-11-1998
Reported in: (1999)(105)ELT181TriDel
1. This is a Misc. Application filed by the applicant company for modification of the Stay Order No. S/262-63/98-NB, dated 23-4-1998.2. Arguing the Misc. Application Shri J.M. Sharma, Id. Consultant submitted that from the date of...
Yuil Measures India Ltd. Vs. Cc
Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi
Decided on: Jun-18-1999
Reported in: (2000)(88)LC411Tri(Delhi)
the demand of duty of Rs. 2,09,54,801/- and also imposed a penalty of Rs. 10,00,000/- on M/s. Yuil Measures India Ltd. and Rs. 1,00,000/- on Shri Sanjeev Kumar Gupta, Director of the appellant's firm.2. The facts of
M/S Measurement Systems (P) Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise,
Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT
Decided on: Jan-04-2001
Matched in: Parties M/S Measurement Systems (P) Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise,
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- Next ›
- Last »
Hover bars for counts · use +/− or drag to zoom · click a bar to filter by year
AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free