Skip to content
How to use Narrow results with filters
  1. Run a keyword search first to load the results page.
  2. Select Supreme Court, a High Court, or tribunal on the left.
  3. Optionally filter by decision year to focus on recent or historical cases.

Measure - Judgment Search Results

Pulse this search Log in to save a LexPulse alert for this search

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Dec 04 2017

Synergy Measurement Technologies (P) Ltd & Anr. Vs.srb Instruments Pri ...

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Dec-04-2017

NEW DELHI $~35 * + O.M.P. (T) (COMM.) 96/2017 & IAs 14175-76/2017 Date of decision:4th December, 2017 SYNERGY MEASUREMENT TECHNOLOGIES (P) LTD & ANR. ........ Petitioners Through: Mr.Sachin Datta, Sr. Adv. with Mr.A.Venkateshwar Rao, Ms.Prity Sharma, Ms.Rijata


Feb 05 2003

Power Measurement Ltd. Vs. U.P. Power Corporation Ltd. and ors.

Court: Allahabad

Decided on: Feb-05-2003

Reported in: 2003(2)AWC1642b

Jagdish Bhalla, J. 1. Petitioner, a foreign Power Measurement Limited company having no office in India, engaged in manufacturing of 0.2S and 0.5S Accuracy Class Energy Meters


Jul 04 2013

Measuring 2711 Kanal 19 Marlas Owned by Gram Panchayat Vs. Indraj Sing ...

Court: Punjab and Haryana

Decided on: Jul-04-2013

are being ferried by larger number of tractors and trucks towards Haryana through Badopur village. As per precautionary measure the District Task Force Committee also directed Gram Panchayat for making obstacles by digging of ditches across the


18-section briefs on any result in this list

Feb 26 2003

P.S. Measurements and Controls Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Technicom Systems (i) Pvt ...

Court: Karnataka

Decided on: Feb-26-2003

Reported in: [2005]124CompCas144(Kar)

Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, for short 'the Act' and refused to grant a measure of interim protection under Section 9 of the Act and thereby vacating the order of injunction restraining the


Nov 29 1968

Calcutta Licensed Measurers Bengal Chamber of Commerce Vs. Md. Hossain

Court: Kolkata

Decided on: Nov-29-1968

Reported in: AIR1969Cal378,73CWN491

carrying papers from place to place etc. If a workman after the accident receives higher salary as a measure of concession or as a measure of grace that will not decide that his earning capacity has not


May 13 2004

Festo Measure Industries Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of C. Ex.

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Decided on: May-13-2004

Reported in: (2004)(172)ELT38TriDel

Matched in: Parties Festo Measure Industries Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of C. Ex.


Apr 28 1998

Yuil Measures Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Commr. of Customs

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Decided on: Apr-28-1998

Reported in: (1999)(112)ELT453TriDel

1. In this case, a duty demand of Rs. 2,09,54,801/- has been confirmed against M/s. Yuil Measures India (hereinafter referred to as applicant No.l) and a penalty of Rs.10 lakhs has been imposed upon this


Aug 11 1998

Yuil Measures (i) Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Customs

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Decided on: Aug-11-1998

Reported in: (1999)(105)ELT181TriDel

1. This is a Misc. Application filed by the applicant company for modification of the Stay Order No. S/262-63/98-NB, dated 23-4-1998.2. Arguing the Misc. Application Shri J.M. Sharma, Id. Consultant submitted that from the date of...


Jun 18 1999

Yuil Measures India Ltd. Vs. Cc

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Decided on: Jun-18-1999

Reported in: (2000)(88)LC411Tri(Delhi)

the demand of duty of Rs. 2,09,54,801/- and also imposed a penalty of Rs. 10,00,000/- on M/s. Yuil Measures India Ltd. and Rs. 1,00,000/- on Shri Sanjeev Kumar Gupta, Director of the appellant's firm.2. The facts of


Jan 04 2001

M/S Measurement Systems (P) Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise,

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT

Decided on: Jan-04-2001

1. The matter was called. Shri G. Sampath submits that he was directed by his clients to withdraw this case. Accordingly, the appeal is dismiss as withdrawn.


  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »
Loading chart…

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial