May V United - Judgment Search Results

Prasad Mathew, Prop: Metro Entertainment Network Vs. S.C.V. Unit of Su ...

Court: Chennai

Reported in: 2004(1)CTLJ422(Mad); (2003)3MLJ784

6 S.C., Page 465, (Surya Dev Rai V. Ram Chander Rai) where it was observed that frequently matters may arise before the Supreme Court where the question would arise whether the jurisdiction under Art. 226 and 227

United India Periodicals (P) Ltd. Vs. Inspecting Assistant Commissione ...

Court: Delhi

Reported in: (1994)50TTJ(Del)84

this point of time, has the authority to impose the penalty is what is relevant. Whoever this authority may be, he is obliged to impose such penalty as was permissible under the law in that behalf on … the source of repayment of loan to M/s Globe Associates P. Ltd. It was claimed that Dr. A. V. Baliga had received donations from different persons and those donations were utilised for repayment of the loan. The

Members of the Combined Civilian Employees Union of Controllerate of Q ...

Court: Central Administrative Tribunal CAT Hyderabad

gone through the relevant provisions of the A.P. Act. Under Section 31 of the Act, the State Government may by notification make exemption or reduction in the rate of tax payable under this Act by any specified … ORAL ORDER (As per Hon'ble Mr. Justice P. Lakshmana Reddy, Vice-Chairman) Heard Mr. K.R.K.V. Prasad, learned counsel for the applicants and and Mr. G. Jaya Prakash Babu, learned Senior … Combined Civilian Employees Union of Controllerate of Quality Assurance- Comprising of 5 Units viz., Controller of quality Assurance (System), Controller of Quality Assurance (Electronics) Warfare,

American National Co. Vs. United States

Court: US Supreme Court

American National Co. v United States - 274 U.S. 99 (1927) U.S. Supreme Court American National Co. v United States, 274 U.S. 99 … other than that of actual receipts and disbursements, unless such other basis does not clearly reflect its income, may, subject to regulations made by the Commissioner of Internal Revenue, . . . make its return upon the

Delaware, Lackawanna and Western R. Co. Vs. United States

Court: US Supreme Court

Delaware, Lackawanna & Western R. Co. v United States - 231 U.S. 363 (1913) U.S. Supreme Court Delaware, Lackawanna & Western R. Co. v United States, … a carrier, and fall within the prohibition of the commodity clause of the Hepburn Act. Although the purchaser may have the right to rescind for a condition subsequent, title may pass on delivery, and so held in