Skip to content
How to use Narrow results with filters
  1. Run a keyword search first to load the results page.
  2. Select Supreme Court, a High Court, or tribunal on the left.
  3. Optionally filter by decision year to focus on recent or historical cases.

May V Commissioner - Judgment Search Results

Pulse this search Log in to save a LexPulse alert for this search

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Feb 25 1999

T. A. Vs. Trust Alleppey V. Commissioner of Income Tax

Court: Supreme Court of India

Decided on: Feb-25-1999

Reported in: (1999)152CTR(SC)439

a document is properly admitted, the contents of those documents are also admitted in evidence, though those contents may not be treated as conclusive evidence. . . .'10. We do not see how these observations of the … was invalid. (Similar assessments were made for subsequent years.) The Appellate Assistant Commissioner allowed the assessee's appeal and his order was confirmed by the Tribunal. … on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the Tribunal was justified in holding that a valid trust came into existence in pursuance of the document dated 17-8-1971 and whether the Tribunal was justified in


Sep 04 1997

Kartikeya Vs. Sarabhai V. Commissioner of Income-tax.

Court: Supreme Court of India

Decided on: Sep-04-1997

Reported in: (1997)142CTR(SC)150

s. 2(47) of the Act. Relinquishment of the asset or the extinguishment of any right in it, which may not amount to sale, can also be considered as a transfer and any profit or gain which arises … on a reduction of share capital with the company paying a part of the capital by reducing face value of its share, results in extinguishment of right in the shares held by the shareholder so that the … this connection, he relied upon the decision in the case reported as CIT vs . R. M. Amin, : [1977]106ITR368(SC) Lastly, it was submitted that


Feb 23 1996

Dr. Vs. P. Gopinathan V. Commissioner of Wealth Tax.

Court: Kerala

Decided on: Feb-23-1996

Reported in: (1996)133CTR(Ker)493

be necessary. The original applicant is a Doctor of Medicine. As a non-resident he returned to India in May, 1979 and, therefore, for the purposes of the asst. yrs. 1980-81 and 1981-82 he became a resident Indian. … V. V. KAMAT, J. :Under s. 27(1) of the WT Act, 1957 the petitioner moved the Tribunal for reference … rendered by one of us (Kamat, J.) in Chackravarthy Hostel vs. Municipal Commissioner 1995 (2) KLT 588 in relation to the provision of exemption on


18-section briefs on any result in this list

Nov 10 1998

Aravind Vs. Saraf V. Commissioner of Gift Tax

Court: Kerala

Decided on: Nov-10-1998

Reported in: (1999)154CTR(Ker)238

Matched in: Parties Aravind Vs. Saraf V. Commissioner of Gift Tax


Apr 30 2001

Dr. Vs. Shanmughavel V. Commissioner of Central Excise

Court: Chennai

Decided on: Apr-30-2001

Reported in: [2002]121TAXMAN274(Mad)

services referred to in sub-clause (g) of clause (48) of section 65 and collected in such manner as may be prescribed. Section 67 provides for the manner in which the valuation of taxable service for charging service … sent by the respondent on 1-5-1998 vide C. No. IV/16/29/97-STC.2. The respondent, Commissioner, Chennai, by its letter dated 1-5-1998 informed the Chairman of the Institution … Sirpurkar, J. W.P. No. 7273 of 1998 has been filed by the Chairman, Institution of Valuers, Tamil Nadu Zone, which institution was constituted in 1968 and is a registered society. The members of the


Mar 13 1987

M. Vs. Kibe V. Commissioner of Wealth-tax.

Court: Madhya Pradesh

Decided on: Mar-13-1987

Reported in: (1987)63CTR(MP)156; [1987]168ITR82(MP); [1987]34TAXMAN364(MP)

commencing before the date of the coming into force of this section) under this Act, the Wealth-tax officer may refer the valuation of any asset to a Valuation officer -(a) in a case where the value of … that the appellate Assistant Commissioner had jurisdiction to direct the Wealth-tax Officer to refer the matter to the Valuation Officer as provided by section 16A of the Wealth-tax Act, 1957 ?'The material facts giving rise to this


Jun 27 1984

V. Vs. George V. Commissioner of Agrl. Income Tax.

Court: Kerala

Decided on: Jun-27-1984

Reported in: (1985)45CTR(Ker)142

of revision under s. 34 of the Act. Secs. 25, 26 and 14 of the Agrl. IT Act may be usefully quoted :'25. Assessment in case of discontinued business of company firm or association. - (1) Where … P3 order passed in revisions by the Commr. of Agrl. IT. The Commissioner referred to ss. 25 and 26 of the Act. He was exercising … 27-7-1968. It was an assessee to Agricultural IT on the files of the 2nd respondent - Agrl. ITO, Vythiri. It is alleged that the firm was dissolved by a Deed of Dissolution dt. 2-6-1980 (Ext. P11). After


Dec 17 1979

C. Vs. Ramanathan V. Commissioner of Income Tax.

Court: Chennai

Decided on: Dec-17-1979

Reported in: (1980)17CTR(Mad)322

legal representative, i.e. Ramanathan, than, according to the ld. counsel, he had not sold the property, though he may have acquired a new one. We do not find that there is any scope for this kind of … on the applicant herein as a legal heir of his father for the assessment year 1970-71 ?'One C. V. Venkateswaran was employed as an engineer in Cochin. He owned a house situated at Mahatma Gandhi Road, Ernakulam … 54 of the Act was not applicable. On appeal, the Appellate Assistant Commissioner confirmed the order of the Income-tax Officer. The assessee appealed to the


Jun 08 1976

C. Vs. Mathukutty V. Commissioner of Income-tax, KeralA.

Court: Kerala

Decided on: Jun-08-1976

Reported in: [1977]108ITR1(Ker)

question will thus arise from the Tribunals order. It is clear from the decision in Gnanambika Mills Ltd. v. Commissioner of Income-tax : [1965]58ITR802(Mad) that no reliance can be placed on comparable cases without the assessee being informed


Aug 20 1971

P. Vs. Devassy V. Commissioner of Income-tax.

Court: Kerala

Decided on: Aug-20-1971

Reported in: [1972]84ITR502(Ker)

and in the manner required by sub-section (1) of section 139 or by such notice, as the case may be, or.........he may direct that such person shall pay by way of penalty, - ......The first argument for … other words, counsel for the assessee argued on the basis of the ruling of this court in Abraham v. Sales Tax Officer, Ponkunnam, which was affirmed by the Supreme Court in Sales Tax Officer v. Abraham, that … of Rs. 14,650. The assessee filed an appeal before the Appellate Assistant Commissioner. The Appellate Assistant Commissioner dismissed the appeal. Against this order the assessee


  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »
Loading chart…

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial