May Be Detained - Judgment Search Results

Sonam Yongda (Ex-captain) Presently Detained in Hazaribagh Central Jai ...

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: AIR1986SC1736,1986CriLJ1606,1986(2)SCALE123,(1986)3SCC594

Matched in: Parties Sonam Yongda (Ex-captain) Presently Detained in Hazaribagh Central Jail, Bihar Vs. State of Sikkim and ors.

Smt.Shanta Prakash Shewale Vs. the Principal Secretary (Appeals and Se ...

Court: Mumbai

question, the incidental question posed is whether the detenu or the Petitioner on his behalf, as the case may be, is entitled to the copy of the detention order and the grounds on which the detention order is … of her husband. She has asserted that she has reason to believe that her husband is likely to be detained. This inference is deduced on the basis of grounds of detention served on the co-detenu Ajit Bapu Satam,

Smt.Shanta Prakash Shewale Vs. the Principal Secretary (Appeals and Se ...

Court: Mumbai

question, the incidental question posed is whether the detenu or the Petitioner on his behalf, as the case may be, is entitled to the copy of the detention order and the grounds on which the detention order is … of her husband. She has asserted that she has reason to believe that her husband is likely to be detained. This inference is deduced on the basis of grounds of detention served on the co-detenu Ajit Bapu Satam,

Sangeetha Kirti Patel Vs. R.A. Rajeev Principal Secretary (Appeals and ...

Court: Mumbai

detention law within which the representation should be dealt with. The use of the word "as soon as may be" occurring in Article 22(5) of the Constitution reflects that the representation should be expeditiously considered and disposed of … ('COFEPOSA' for short). By the said order the Respondent No.1 has directed that the said Kirti Vanabhai Patel be detained under the COFEPOSA Act, 1974 with a view to prevent him in future from abating the smuggling of

Shaikh Mohd. Rafiq Mohd. HussaIn Vs. Preventive Detention Secretary to ...

Court: Mumbai

Reported in: 1990CriLJ2422

J.1. The Secretary (Preventive Detention) to the Government of Maharashtra, Home Department, and Detaining Authority passed order dated May, 9, 1989 in exercise of powers under sub-section (1) of Section 3 of the Conservation of Foreign Exchange … Pendse, J.1. The Secretary (Preventive Detention) to the Government of Maharashtra, Home Department, and Detaining Authority passed order dated May, 9, 1989 in exercise of powers under sub-section (1) of Section 3 of

Rajkumar Kallu Sahu Detained in Baroda Prison Vs. State of Gujarat

Court: Gujarat

Reported in: (1999)3GLR696

and tried accordingly. It does not, however, mean that each inaccuracy or deficiency in maintaining the requisite record may be as serious as violation of the provisions of Section 5 or 6 of the Act and the Court … given by the concerned witnesses are also produced before the court for its perusal. The papers of the Detaining Authority are also before the court. It is indisputable that the petitioner has been indulging into offences punishable

Shri Sakerwala Zuzar Mohsinbhai Vs. the Principal Secretary (Appeals a ...

Court: Mumbai

Police. The Court was required to hear the application for cancellation of his bail, which he moved. It may be mentioned that the Petitioner came to be arrested in the case of smuggling certain goods on 4.1.2006 He … Authority, and consequently, not considered. Hence, the detention order is liable to be vitiated. The Petitioner came to be detained on and from 4.1.2006. His first statement under Section 108 of the Customs Act came to be recorded