Matrimonial Causes - Judgment Search Results

Bharat Matrimony.Com Pvt. Ltd. Vs. People Interactive (I) Pvt. Ltd.

Court: Supreme Court of India

NON-REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NO.2142 OF2007BHARAT MATRIMONY.COM APPELLANT PVT. LTD. VERSUS PEOPLE INTERACTIVE (I) RESPONDENT PVT. LTD. JUDGMENT KURIAN, J.1. It has been brought to our notice that...

Matrimony.Com Limited vs Assistant Commissioner/Gsto (Ward-94) & Anr.

Court: Delhi

is taken up for final disposal at admissionstage.3. The challenge in the present petition is to the show cause notice dated27th February, 2026 issued by the respondent no. 1, wherein it is proposed to cancel the GST

Bharat Matrimony Com. P. Ltd. Vs. People Interactive (i) Pvt. Ltd.

Court: Chennai

Reported in: AIR2009Mad78; 2009(41)PTC709(Mad)

the plaintiffs service.2. The applicants/plaintiffs have contended in their applications that the applicant, who is a pioneer for matrimonial alliance, created a system; 'Assured Contact-Phone Verification Service' through its employees during the course of employment. The application … the core idea of the system development using the Interactive Voice Response, has set up an identical platform causing huge loss to the business of the applicant. The copyrights of the mark illustrated has been utilised by

“The Matrimonial Dispute Between the Parties Had Vs. State of Punjab ...

Court: Punjab and Haryana

the mother-in-law. On 5.12.2013, while issuing notice of motion, the following order was passed by this Court:- “The matrimonial dispute between the parties had been referred to the Mediation and Conciliation Centre and both the parties had

Bharat Matrimony Com. Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Commr. of Service Tax

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Tamil Nadu

Reported in: (2007)6STT85

examining the records and hearing both sides, we find that the appellants are in the business of providing matrimonial service from portals/websites. They operate and update matrimonial information on their 14 portals/websites in the name and style

Present: Mr.R.S.Dhaliwal Advocate Vs. Matrimonial Dispute.

Court: Punjab and Haryana

Sub Divisional Judicial Magistrate, Sunam, who has no objection if the present criminal litigation arising out of a matrimonial dispute is quashed. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the affected parties have resolved their all disputes

Re: in the Matter of Matrimonial Disputes Vs. State of U.P. and Others

Court: Allahabad

Reported in: 2012(3)KLT49(SN)(C.No.50)

to save families, and children and indeed the institution of marriage, an effort be first made for reconciling matrimonial disputes by mediation before steps can be taken for prosecuting offenders, if they are called for. In Preeti … from committing any further offence, (ii) for proper investigation of the offence; (iii) to prevent such person from causing the evidence of the offence to disappear or tampering with the evidence in any manner; (iv) for preventing

M/S. Bharat Matrimony.Com Pvt. Ltd. Rep. by Its Director J. Murugavel ...

Court: Chennai

(PRAYER: Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying for a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, calling for the records comprised in Stay Order No.739 of 2006 dated 23.6.06 and the consequential Final Order...

“counsel Contends That the Matrimonial Dispute Vs. State of Punjab - ...

Court: Punjab and Haryana

31.3.2014, while issuing notice of motion, the following order was passed by this Court: “Counsel contends that the matrimonial dispute between the parties has since been settled and even a compromise between the complainant i.e.wife, the present