Mate - Judgment Search Results

Pandharinath Pandurang Mate deceased by his legal heirs Patil Pandhari ...

Court: Mumbai

as tenancy case No. 12 of 1987 stating that the suit property in fact belong to Kasabai Tukaram Mate, who was a widow on tiller's day i.e. 1 April 1957. The said Kasabai expired on 24 December

Ashok Yeshwant Mate Vs. Amita Ashok Mate (Sou.) and ors.

Court: Mumbai

Reported in: 1983(2)BomCR301

Matched in: Parties Ashok Yeshwant Mate Vs. Amita Ashok Mate (Sou.) and ors.

Smt. Lalita Mate Vs. the State of Madhya Pradesh

Court: Madhya Pradesh

W.P.No.12671/2013 (Smt. Lalita Mate versus State of MP and otheRs.05.08.2013 Heard Ms.Malti Dadariya, learned counsel for the petitioner on the question of

Latika Gorakh Mate Vs. the Secretary, Rural Education Society,

Court: Mumbai

Reported in: 2009(111)BomLR2884

Matched in: Parties Latika Gorakh Mate Vs. the Secretary, Rural Education Society,

Bhagwan Charan Mate Vs. State of Maharashtra

Court: Mumbai

Reported in: 2006CriLJ579

A.H. Joshi, J.1. The appellant herein along with one more accuse Dhanpal S/o Hiraman Mate was tried under Section 376 of the Indian Penal Code in Sessions Case No. 33 of 1994 by

Thomas Mates Gudinho Vs. the Election Commission of India, New Delhi a ...

Court: Karnataka

Reported in: 2002(4)KarLJ36

ORDERR.V. Raveendran, J.1. The petitioner is a permanent resident of Karwar City and a voter of No. 172, Karwar Assembly Constituency. In the 1999 elections, results of which were declared on 6-10-1999, one Vasanth Kamalakar Asnotikar...

Sri Thomas Mates Gudinho Vs. Election Commission of India, New Delhi a ...

Court: Karnataka

Reported in: AIR2002Kant232; ILR2002KAR3078

sufficient opportunity, has failed to substantiate his defence Land Tribunal has proceeded on the basis of relevant clinching material available on its file and registered occupancy rights in favour of deceased tenant represented by respondents - Held,

Pragi Lal (Mate) Son of Bhikhari and ors. Vs. State of U.P. Through Se ...

Court: Allahabad

Reported in: [2007(112)FLR1208]

the fact that the petitioners have worked for 240 days in a years is not supported by any material. It has been considered by the authorities concerned and while rejecting the representation of the petitioners the Executive

Sea Mates India Vs. Commissioner of Income-tax

Court: Kerala

Reported in: [1999]240ITR484(Ker)

K.K. Usha, J. 1. This tax reference case at the instance of the asses-see arises out of an order passed by the Income-tax Appellate Tribunal, Cochin Bench in I.T.A. No. 570/Coch. of 1989. The relevant assessment...

Rami Niranjan Desai vs Houlim Shokhopao Mate and Ors.

Court: Delhi

.....Plaintiff Through: Mr. Raghav Awasthi, Ms. Nabeena N. Alikadli, Mr. Jagdish Trivedi and Mr. Ravi Gupta, Advs.versusHOULIM SHOKHOPAO MATE AND ORS. .....Defendants Through: Mr. Rajesh Kumar and Ms. Priya Rastogi, Advs. for D-1. Mr. Hrishikesh Baruah, Mr.