Matching - Judgment Search Results

Godavari Match Industries, Mamasapuram by Its Proprietor and 4 Others ...

Court: Chennai

Reported in: (2000)1MLJ556

and the defendants. The said suit was filed for an injunction restraining the defendants from manufacturing and selling match boxes containing the infringing trade marks of the plaintiff; for accounts; damages estimated in the plaint at Rs.500

Pazhancottai Match Factory a Firm Carrying on Business in Partnership ...

Court: Chennai

Reported in: (1975)2MLJ21

the parties very elaborately. The appellant is a firm registered under the Partnership Act, manufacturing and selling safety matches under the name, label and trade mark of Delux Safety Matches. The appellant instituted the suit praying :

Western India Match Co. Ltd. Vs. the Western India Match Co. Workers U ...

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: AIR1970SC1205; [1970(20)FLR297]; 1970LabIC1033; (1970)IILLJ256SC; (1970)1SCC225; [1970]3SCR370

J.M. Shelat, J. 1. On May 9, 1956 the appellant-company appointed respondent 3 as a foreman on probation for a period of six months. On expiry of that period the probationary period was extended from time...

Anja Match Industries Rep. by Its Proprietor Mr. A. Ramamoorthi and An ...

Court: Chennai

Reported in: 1999CriLJ181; 1998(2)CTC651

ORDER1. Anja Match Industries and M/s. Bhavadharani Match Industries (A2 and A3), the petitioners herein, represented by their proprietor, A. Ramamoorthi,

V. Pichandi Sole Proprietor Shri Ambika Match Works Through Its G.P.A. ...

Court: Mumbai

Reported in: 2010(1)BomCR394; 2010(112)BomLR114

The plaintiff/appellant has filed suit against the respondents for relief of perpetual injunction restraining them from selling safety matches, manufactured and marketed by them using the offending trade mark, which is similar to the trade mark on

K. Mohideen HussaIn Jaffer, Licencee Andavar Match Works, Kovilpatti, ...

Court: Chennai

Reported in: 1983(12)ELT763(Mad)

Industries Commission (hereinafter referred to as the 'Commission') dated 18th December, 1979. The petitioners are manufacturers of safety matches under relevant licences issued under the Central Excises and Salt Act 1944. By Notification No. 154 of 1975

Pope the King Match Factory, a Registered Firm Having Its Factory and ...

Court: Chennai

Reported in: (1987)1MLJ391

for the relief of interim injunction restraining the respondents from using a trade mark for the product of matches, which is similar to the registered trade mark of the petitioner.2. The facts of the case are briefly

The Western India Match Co. Ltd. Vs. the Manohara Match Works and ors.

Court: Chennai

Reported in: AIR1965Mad42

of the trade mark 'Matulaies' adopted by respondents 1 to 3. The petitioners are reputed manufactures of safety matches, and one of their trademark is 'three mangoes' which they are using ever since 1934, on the packets

The Western India Match Company, Limited Vs. the Manohara Match Works, ...

Court: Chennai

Reported in: (1964)1MLJ355

of the trade mark 'Matulaies' adopted by respondents 1 to 3. The petitioners are reputed manufacturers of safety matches, and one of their trade marks ' Three mangoes' which they are using ever since 1934, on the

Sivakasi Chamber of Match Vs. Western India Match Co. Ltd.

Court: Monopolies and Restrictive Trade Practices Commission MRTPC

1. Messrs. Sivakasi Chamber of Match Industries, the complainant in the present enquiry, filed an application dated January 12, 1976, praying that the respondent