Skip to content
How to use Narrow results with filters
  1. Run a keyword search first to load the results page.
  2. Select Supreme Court, a High Court, or tribunal on the left.
  3. Optionally filter by decision year to focus on recent or historical cases.

Masked - Judgment Search Results

Pulse this search Log in to save a LexPulse alert for this search

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Aug 18 2004

Navnath Namdeo Maske and Kerba Chandrabhan Gore Vs. the State of Mahar ...

Court: Mumbai

Decided on: Aug-18-2004

Reported in: 2004CriLJ4756

21 of Accused No. 2 was detected. Blood group of Shobha is 'A'.25. Blood group of accused Navnath Maske is 'B' and that of Accused No. 3 Kerba Gore is 'A'. No semen was detected on the


Oct 05 2004

Vatsala Narayan Maske and ors. Vs. State of Maharashtra and ors.

Court: Mumbai

Decided on: Oct-05-2004

Reported in: 2005(2)BomCR55

Joshi A.H., J.1. This is a petition filed by Narayan s/o Sitaram Maske, who is no more and the petition is prosecuted further by his Legal Heirs since the claim involved


Jul 25 2012

Dayaram Dagdoba Maske, Parali District Vs. the State of Maharashtra, T ...

Court: Mumbai Aurangabad

Decided on: Jul-25-2012

B.P. Dharmadhikari, J. 1. Looking to the nature of controversy involved, Rule is made returnable forthwith and matter is heard finally with consent of the parties. Adv. Brahme for petitioner assails selection of the respondent no....


18-section briefs on any result in this list

Jul 25 2012

Dayaram Dagdoba Maske, Parali District Vs. the State of Maharashtra, T ...

Court: Mumbai Aurangabad

Decided on: Jul-25-2012

B.P. Dharmadhikari, J. 1. Looking to the nature of controversy involved, Rule is made returnable forthwith and matter is heard finally with consent of the parties. Adv. Brahme for petitioner assails selection of the respondent no....


Feb 01 1974

Ramkrishna Baburao Maske Vs. Kishan Shivraj Shelke

Court: Mumbai

Decided on: Feb-01-1974

Reported in: (1974)76BOMLR424; 1974MhLJ659

Bhole, J.1. This is an appeal by the complainant, who has failed in getting the accused, whom he prosecuted, convicted. He prosecuted them for offences punishable under Section 417 read with Section 34, Indian Penal Code,...


Nov 09 1999

Mask Enterprises Vs. Commissioner of Customs

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai

Decided on: Nov-09-1999

Reported in: (2000)(117)ELT172Tri(Mum.)bai

1. The dispute in this appeal relates to valuation of ball bearings imported by the appellants. These ball bearings were of various specifications and of various origins. A few were manufactured by SKF.The lot also included...


Nov 09 2009

M/S. Mask-n-pack Vs. Commissioner of Customs, Tuticorin

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Chennai

Decided on: Nov-09-2009

Per Dr. Chittaranjan Satapathy Heard both learned DR. No one is present on behalf of the appellants. There is neither any report of compliance nor any adjournment request. As such the appeal is dismissed for non-compliance...


Jul 30 1943

Mask and Co. Vs. the Commissioner of Income-tax

Court: Chennai

Decided on: Jul-30-1943

Reported in: AIR1943Mad670; (1943)2MLJ274

Alfred Henry Lionel Leach, C.J.1. The assessee in this case is a firm carrying on business in crackers. The assessee entered into a contract with other traders in the same line of business, under which the...


Mar 30 1943

Mask and Co. Vs. Commissioner of Income-tax, Madras.

Court: Chennai

Decided on: Mar-30-1943

Reported in: [1943]11ITR454(Mad)

JUDGMENT OF APPELLATE TRIBUNAL "This is an appeal preferred by the Income-tax Officer, Cuddalore, praying that the amount of Rs. 6,203 allowed by the Appellate Assistant Commissioner as business expense to the respondent may be disallowed....


Feb 02 1938

Mask and Co. and anr. Vs. Secretary of State

Court: Chennai

Decided on: Feb-02-1938

Reported in: AIR1938Mad608

Varadachariar, J.1. This appeal arises out of a suit for recovery of excess customs duty paid by the plaintiffs Under protest and raises a question as to the jurisdiction of the Civil Court to deal with...


  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »
Loading chart…

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial