Masai - Judgment Search Results

Sri Balesh S/O Bhujappa Hosur vs the State of Karnataka

Court: Karnataka Dharwad

OCC: AGRICULTURE,7. SRI. BAPUSAB S/O BARIGOUD NADAGOUD. AGE: 58, OCC: AGRICULTURE, R/AT:SAPTASAGAR, TQ: ATHANI, DIST: BELAGAVI.590001. -2-8. SMT. MASAI RAMJAN BADE AGE:46, OCC: HOUSEHOLD,9. SRI.KHAJABI W/O DASTAGIRI BADE.AGE: 49, OCC: HOUSE HOLD, 10.SRI.KASAPPA S/O RAMA SAVADI. AGE:

Smt. Mumtaz D/O Dulhan Mulla vs Smt. Pyaran Khadeer Mulla

Court: Karnataka Dharwad

R/O. GULAB COLONY, Location: High Court of Karnataka, 100 FT. ROAD, Dharwad Bench BABA CHOWK, SANGLI, MAHARASHTRA-416416.2. SMT. MASAI @ MINAJW/O. BAHADURKHAN PATHAN AND D/O. DULHAN MULLA, AGE 43 YEARS, OCC: HOUSEHOLD WORK, -2- R/O. NEW VAIBHAV

Rajesab Imamsab Jamadar vs Balasab Imamsab Jamadar

Court: Karnataka Dharwad

JAMADAR, AGE: 55 YEARS, OCC: AGRICULTURE, R/O: KAGWAD-591503,2. SHRI NOORUDDIN BASALAB JAMADAR AGE: 44 YEARS, OCC: AGRICULTURE,3. SMT MASAI BALASAB JAMADAR AGE: 75 YEARS, OCC: HOUSEHOLD WORK,4. SMT AVUMA HARUN MOMIN AGE: 53 YEARS, OCC: HOUSEHOLD WORK,

Dakua Tiria Vs. State of Jharkhand

Court: Jharkhand

Purty Munda (P.W.­1), Mangal Singh Tiria (P.W.­2), Ismail Barua (P.W.­3), Raj Kumar Purty (P.W.­4), Ruguria Tiriya (P.W.­8) and Masai Tiriya (P.W.­9) are either hearsay witnesses or formal witnesses. They have repeated the story narrated to them by

Shanthi Mani V G vs State of Karnataka

Court: Karnataka

thesettled position of law passed by the Hon'ble Apex Court in the case of Thomas Daniel and Rafiq Masai and other latest pronouncements, submits - 18 - that once benefit which has been settled as per the

Premlata Balkrishna Varma Vs. the State of Maharashtra and ors.

Court: Mumbai

Reported in: 2005(3)ALLMR184

on 6.4.2004. It is also not in dispute that the hall ticket was issued to the petitioner at Masai and her examination center was at Nasik was it possible for the petitioner to appear- in first language

Mahant Ram Swaroop Vs. State of Rajasthan and ors.

Court: Rajasthan

Reported in: 1986(1)WLN739

Narendra Mohan Kasliwal, J.1. Both the above writ petitions are disposed of by one single order as the facts in both the cases are connected with each-other and an order was also passed to connect both...

M. Veerabadhran and ors. Vs. Cce and Ravi Kumar and Co.

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Tamil Nadu

Reported in: (2005)(98)ECC790

Tribunal. The facts of the instant case are also more or less similar to those of Ghodavat Pan Masai a Products (supra). The Department worked out an unintelligible formula for assessing alleged clandestine production and removal of

SainuddIn Vs. Latifannessa Bibi

Court: Kolkata

Reported in: (1919)ILR46Cal141

us that a post nuptial delegation of the power of divorce or tufwees-i-talaq, as it is called by Masai man lawyers, is not valid. No authority has been cited for such a proposition. A reference to books

Musai and ors. Vs. Emperor

Court: Allahabad

Reported in: 13Ind.Cas.847

the men who beat him. Debi Prasad, Sukhdeo, and Parbatia are all interested in securing the conviction of Masai and Chekuri. Jaimangal and Jarbandhan are not. We do not think that it, is safe to hold upon