Married Women S Property Act 1874 Section 9 - Judgment Search Results

Ruma Chakraborty Vs. Sudha Rani Banerjee and anr.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : AIR2005SC3557; 2005(6)ALD116(SC); 2005(4)AWC3791(SC); (SCSuppl)2006(1)CHN90; 2005(5)CTC226; II(2005)DMC716SC; JT2005(12)SC134; RLW2005(4)SC2882; 2005(8)SCALE124; (2005)8SCC

to the provisions of this section a hindu wife whether married before or after the commencement of this act shall be son the husband applied under section 17 of the married women s property act 1882 for an order for possession of the dependant and the deceased f the value of the property of the dependant and any income derived from such property sections 3 and 18 of the hindu adoptions and maintenance act 1956 2 that by precluding the appellant from contesting the in whose favour an order has been made under this section has remarried or if such party is the wife that viswamitra and ors v yadav sadashiv mule and ors air2004sc4377 9 dr a k roy v j c roy choudhury and

Madan Lal Lohia Vs. Assistant Collector and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : AIR1977SC1871; [1977]108ITR627(SC); (1977)3SCC189; [1977]3SCR489

..... of an insurance policy taken out by the deceased under the married women s property act 1874 which policy is exempt from payment of estate duty by ..... called estate duty at the rates fixed in accordance with section 35 what property shall be deemed to pass on the death of a ..... notice of demand under section 73 sub section 1 was served on the lessors before issuing the notice dated 9 1 1962 it could .....

Northern India Caterers Private Ltd. and anr. Vs. State of Punjab and ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : AIR1967SC1581; (1967)69PLR781; [1967]3SCR399

requirements of fines and recoveries act 1833 which empowered a married woman to dispose of land by deed which she held was held to have been impliedly repealed by the married women s property act 1882 which authorised her in general terms by themselves as against tenants and occupiers of private owned properties and that such classification is justified on the around that investigation commission act 1947 might have been sustained even an act giving the executive an option of sending a case for ordinary law merely on ground that both deals with eviction section 5 confers additional remedy to government and unguided power to s c r 324 332 5 1957 s c r 970 6 1955 2 s c r 887 7 1963 2

Smt. Sarbati Devi and anr. Vs. Smt. Usha Devi

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : II(1984)ACC377; AIR1984SC346; 1984(32)BLJR210; [1984]55CompCas214(SC); (1984)1CompLJ1(SC); 1983(2)SCALE869; (1984)1SCC424; [1984]1SCR992; 1984(16)LC866(SC)

..... not apply to any policy of life insurance to which section 6 of the married women s property act 1874 applies or has at any time applied provided that where a nomination made whether before ..... b m mundkur v life insurance corporation air1977mad72 thus the nominee excludes the legal heirs 9 two mistakes committed by the delhi high court in the above passage are these in .....

Joseph Shine Vs. Union of India

Court : Supreme Court of India

not adultery per se but the proprietary interest of a married man in his wife almost all ancient religions civilizations punished modern code of law days are past we hope when women were looked upon as property by their husbands but that the woman as a chattel it treats her as the property of man and totally subservient to the will of the 35 s 54 1 a law reform marriage and divorce act 1976 malaysia states 54 1 in its inquiry into the so as to invite the culpability of section 497 ipc section 198 crpc deals with a person aggrieved sub section 2 impugned clause in section 497 of the indian penal code 9 6 the appellant is not a citizen of india it

Prasanta Kumar Sahoo Vs. Charulata Sahu .

Court : Supreme Court of India

1 of the bill which sought to exclude the daughter married before the commencement of the amendment act from the benefit india sought inter alia to restrain practice of discrimination against women and made equal treatment of women a part of the as scheduled in the plaint are ancestral or self acquired properties of the predecessor in interest of the plaintiff and defendants ownership and shall be regarded notwithstanding anything contained in this act or any other law for the time being in force section 6 3 is the same as explanation i to section 6 as originally enacted emphasis supplied 71 the following propositions governed by mitakshara law b the coparcenary must exist on 9 9 2005 i e the date of commencement of the

V. Tulasamma and ors. Vs. Sesha Reddy (Dead) by Lrs.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : (1977)3SCC99; [1977]3SCR261

on the subject was consolidated and codified by the hindu married women s right to separate maintenance and residence act 1946 clearly illustrates the high position which is bestowed on hindu women by the shastric law this extract clearly shows that there any other manner what so ever and also any such property held by her as stridhana immediately before the commencement of sub section 2 of section 14 of the hindu succession act 1956 that applies where property is given to a hindu 2 but would be governed by sub section 1 of section 14 the conclusion is therefore inescapable that where property is of the aforesaid properties in sheo dyal v judoonath 1868 9 suth wr 61 the calcutta high court stressed the fact

Vidya (Smt) Vs. Nand Ram Alias Asoop Ram (Dead) by Lrs.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : 2001(3)ALLMR(SC)273; 2001(2)ALT22(SC); JT2000(10)SC260; (2001)1MLJ120(SC); (2001)10SCC747

contention he made reference to section 2 of the hindu married women s right to separate residence and maintenance act 1946 accepted by all including the present appellant then came hindu women s right to property 1937 which created hindu women s vidya will have the right in the movable and immovable properties 2 the said will was never contested on the contrary hindu whether acquired before or after the commencement of this act shall be held by her as full owner thereof and order1 this appeal raises the question of interpretation of section 14 1 and 2 of the hindu succession act 1956

Sher Singh @ Partapa Vs. State of Haryana

Court : Supreme Court of India

from a dowry demand and the death of a young married woman as is sought to be indicated by the words with confronted with the pestilential proliferation of incidents of married women being put to death because of avaricious and insatiable dowry of dowry section 2 thereof defines dowry as including any property or valuable security given or agreed to be given by section 304b to distinguish this provision from the others in actuality however it is well nigh impossible to give a sensible sequence of facts despite having employed the word shown in section 304b the question is whether these two words can be informed of the death of the deceased on 7 2 98 by angrez singh pw4 in cross examination even this witness

Jupudy Pardha Sarathy Vs. Pentapati Rama Krishna and Ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

and one daughter thereafter second wife also died he then married to veeraraghavamma as a third wife who is alive the for maintenance by creating a charge 16 the hindu married women s right to separate maintenance and residence act 1946 was to the effect that a widow who succeeded to the property of her deceased husband on the strength of his will existing right of maintenance it becomes absolute right after 1956 act came into force as veeraraghavamma became absolute owner by virtue deemed to be possessed by her and by force of section 14 1 she would get absolute interest in the property 14 1 and 2 of the act the court held 9 it was clearly held in the above case that section