Married Women S Property Act 1874 Section 9 - Judgment Search Results
Home > Cases Phrase: married women s property act 1874 section 9 Court: supreme court of india Year: 1984 Page 1 of about 301 results (1.718 seconds)Smt. Rukmani Devi and ors. Vs. Narendra Lal Gupta
Court : Supreme Court of India
Decided on : Sep-13-1984
Reported in : AIR1984SC1866; 1984(2)SCALE589; (1985)1SCC144; 1985(17)LC196(SC)
the proviso to section 273 and urged that where the property of the deceased is situated in more than one state he first pointed that section 270 of the indian succession act confers jurisdiction on the district judge to grant probate upon court had jurisdiction to entertain the application as provided by section 270 of the indian succession act now the question is
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTNaraIn Khamman Vs. Parduman Kumar Jain
Court : Supreme Court of India
Decided on : Oct-19-1984
Reported in : AIR1985SC4; 1984(2)SCALE650; (1985)1SCC1; [1985]1SCR1025; 1985(17)LC422(SC)
married sons and their wives eight grand children and two married daughters with their children and that it could not be the right which a landlord has under the transfer of property act 1882 to recover possession of the properly let by union territory of delhi under section 14 1 of the act a landlord is disentitled from obtaining possession of any premises trial of certain applications it consists of three sections namely sections 25a 25b and 25c section 25a provides that the provisions o m no 12031 1 74 pol ii dated september 9 1975 and subsequently clarified by another order namely o m
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTManick Chand Pal and 35 ors. Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and 3 ors.
Court : Supreme Court of India
Decided on : Apr-17-1984
Reported in : AIR1984SC1249; 1985(4)ECC201; 1985LC514(SC); 1984(18)ELT185(SC); (1984)3SCC65; [1984]3SCR461; 1984(16)LC1072(SC)
by giving an example that if guests or relations particularly married daughters and sisters visit the residence of a gold dealer into ornaments and to claim such ornaments as his personal property it is further pointed out that it had been repeatedly power to effect seizure and adjudge confiscation conferred by the act is considered in juxta position with the right conferred upon sub rule 1 are unreasonable the validity of the amended section 100 read with rule 3 1 must therefore be upheld secretary ministry of finance filed in w p nos 918 953 of 1977 showing how the classification made between the two
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTSharad Birdhichand Sarda Vs. State of Maharashtra
Court : Supreme Court of India
Decided on : Jul-17-1984
Reported in : AIR1984SC1622; (1984)86BOMLR536; 1984CriLJ1738; 1984(2)SCALE445; (1984)4SCC116; [1985]1SCR88
quite happy and cheerful as was expected of a newly married girl even so whatever manju had said does not appear such as to show that within all human probability the act must have been done by the accused this decision was transaction and they must have some proximate relation to the actual occurrence 16 in gokul chandra chatterjee v the state air1950cal306 death are admissible the second part of clause 1 of section 32 viz the circumstances of the transaction which resulted in on the evidence led by the prosecution on this point 99 the question of the appellant having been last seen with
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTindra Pal Gupta Vs. Managing Committee, Model Inter College, Thora
Court : Supreme Court of India
Decided on : May-03-1984
Reported in : AIR1984SC1110; [1984(49)FLR150]; 1984LabIC900; 1984(1)SCALE714; (1984)3SCC384; [1984]3SCR752; 1984(2)SLJ47(SC); 1984(16)LC654(SC)
or documents relating to the college or any other college property in your possession all accounts also may kindly be cleared to operate any account nor will you perform any other act in the capacity of the principal of this institution henceforth act 1921 validity of termination of service was under challenge section 16g prescribes procedure for termination no show cause notice given shall be confirmed if he fulfils the requirements of regulation 9 has worked with diligence and otherwise proved himself fit for
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTNarinder Kumar and ors. Vs. State of Punjab and ors.
Court : Supreme Court of India
Decided on : Nov-29-1984
Reported in : AIR1985SC275; [1985(50)FLR132]; 1985LabIC541; (1985)ILLJ337SC; 1984(2)SCALE826; (1985)1SCC130; [1985]2SCR152; 1985(17)LC297(SC)
on assault part motive for crime was that deceased a married man was having illicit relationship with another lady delay in implications arising out of section 22 2 of the apprentices act paragraph 2 of the letters of appointment creates a binding implications arising out of section 22 2 of the apprentices act paragraph 2 of the letters of appointment creates a binding very object of the provision made by the legislature in section 22 2 of the act the object of that provision of a vacancy in which an apprentice can be appointed 9 we are also of the opinion that apart from the
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTS.M. Saiyad Vs. Baroda Municipal Corporation Baroda
Court : Supreme Court of India
Decided on : Aug-07-1984
Reported in : AIR1984SC1829; [1985(50)FLR81]; 1984LabIC1446; 1984(2)SCALE312; 1984Supp(1)SCC378; 1985(17)LC45(SC)
the appellant within a period of two months from today 9 the appeal is allowed to the extent herein indicated as
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTLallu Ram and ors. Vs. State of U.P. and anr.
Court : Supreme Court of India
Decided on : Sep-27-1984
Reported in : AIR1984SC1886; 1985CriLJ354; 1984(2)Crimes750(SC); 1984(2)SCALE593; 1984Supp(1)SCC424; [1985]1SCR862
is correct there is no resemblance between the two photographs 9 the district magistrate has stated that the officers of the
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTUnion of India (Uoi) and anr. Vs. Avtar Singh and anr.
Court : Supreme Court of India
Decided on : Apr-04-1984
Reported in : AIR1984SC1048; 1984(1)SCALE822; (1984)3SCC589; [1984]3SCR391; 1984(16)LC1011(SC)
has been defined in section 2 c to mean any property which has been declared or is deemed to have been act 1993 sections 3 4 5 applicability of act held act is not retrospective it does not apply to transactions which reached or recorded in exercise of the power conferred by section 33 so as to exhaust the power of revision consequently were uprooted out of their abodes the act was enacted 9 section 2 b defines displaced person to mean any person
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTJaspal Singh Vs. Additional District Judge, Bulandshahr and ors.
Court : Supreme Court of India
Decided on : Sep-28-1984
Reported in : AIR1984SC1880; 1984(2)SCALE538; (1984)4SCC434; [1985]1SCR889; 1985(17)LC33(SC)
male issue but had four daughters all of whom were married and were residing with their husbands outside bulandshahr he also and comprehensive sense as indicating the person upon whom the property devolves on the death of another and hence when the a of act no 13 of 1972 3 in this act unless the context otherwise require a tenant in relation to parties are allowed to bear their own costs tenancy eviction sections 3 11 13 and 14 of uttar pradesh urban buildings this stage to refer to material provisions of the act 9 the word family has been defined in section 3 g
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT