Married Women S Property Act 1874 Section 9 - Judgment Search Results
Home > Cases Phrase: married women s property act 1874 section 9 Court: supreme court of india Year: 2014 Page 1 of about 337 results (2.85 seconds)Kishore Samrite Vs. the State of M.P
Court : Supreme Court of India
Decided on : Feb-07-2014
of the scheduled castes and scheduled tribes prevention of atrocities act 1989 was rejected review of the order has been sought of the scheduled castes and scheduled tribes prevention of atrocities act 1989 was rejected review of the order has been sought whereby the petitioner s prayer for stay of conviction under section 435 149 332 149 427 149 147 of the indian
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTChairman Cum Md Iocl and ors. Vs. Sunita Kumari and anr.
Court : Supreme Court of India
Decided on : Sep-18-2014
light diesel oil sko ldo the appointment was reserved for women belonging to scheduled castes and was for warisnagar district samastipur the country since several thousand allottees were affected soon thereafter transfer petitions were filed to transfer the cases pending in various appropriate to direct that the 7th respondent should cease to act as a dealer for the 2nd respondent pursuant to the the decision rendered in another case that is cwjc no 9362 of 2009 and mukund swarup mishra 34 in appeal being
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTUnion of India and ors. Vs. S.P.Verma
Court : Supreme Court of India
Decided on : Feb-11-2014
under section 9 of public premises eviction of unauthorized occupants act 1971 was pending when the punishment of dismissal was inflicted under section 9 of public premises eviction of unauthorized occupants act 1971 was pending when the punishment of dismissal was inflicted merit admittedly the appeal preferred by the respondent employee under section 9 of public premises eviction of unauthorized occupants act 1971 admittedly the appeal preferred by the respondent employee under section 9 of public premises eviction of unauthorized occupants act 1971 was
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTArnesh Kumar Vs. State of Bihar and anr.
Court : Supreme Court of India
Decided on : Jul-02-2014
increase in matrimonial disputes in recent years the institution of marriage is greatly revered in this country section 498 a of quarter of those arrested under this provision in 2012 were women i e 47 951 which depicts that mothers and sisters handy tool to the police officers who lack sensitivity or act with oblique motive law commissions police commissions and this court maximum sentence provided under section 4 of the dowry prohibition act is two years and with fine petitioner happens to be three years and fine whereas the maximum sentence provided under section 4 of the dowry prohibition act is two years and records bureau ministry of home affairs shows arrest of 1 97 762 persons all over india during the year 2012 for
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTRakesh Baban Borhade Vs. the State of Maharashtra and anr Etc.Etc.
Court : Supreme Court of India
Decided on : Nov-19-2014
company and also deliberately suppressed several transactions relating to the property prior to mou 4 the sessions court dismissed the anticipatory section 438 has been amended by cr p c amendment act 2005 act 25 of 2005 by which old sub section old sub section 1 has been substituted by new sub sections 1 1a and 1b the guiding factors for grant of consideration by the courts while dealing with the anticipatory bail 9 in the light of the parameters laid down in siddharam
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTRakesh Baban Borhade Vs. the State of Maharashtra and anr Etc.Etc.
Court : Supreme Court of India
Decided on : Nov-19-2014
involved in it whether the appellant accused has sold the property to m s siddhivinayak enterprises in his capacity as the section 438 has been amended by cr p c amendment act 2005 act 25 of 2005 by which old sub section old sub section 1 has been substituted by new sub sections 1 1a and 1b the guiding factors for grant of consideration by the courts while dealing with the anticipatory bail 9 in the light of the parameters laid down in siddharam
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTState of U.P. and ors. Vs. M/S Jaswant Sugar Mills Ltd.and ors.Etc.
Court : Supreme Court of India
Decided on : Jun-30-2014
by sub divisional magistrate meerut confirming the sale of the properties owned by the company and the order dated 5th april interest on the logic of various provisions contained in the act yet there is an element of equity in favour of crores accordingly the district collector meerut appointed a receiver under section 286 a of u p zamindari abolition and land reforms 1 05 518 69 total rs 6 09 74 211 98 12 the state government filed the deduction statement for recovery
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTBalwan and ors. Vs. State of Haryana
Court : Supreme Court of India
Decided on : Aug-26-2014
law of deceased bani singh pw5 smt sudha is the married daughter of the deceased accused naresh and naseeb are sons be borne in mind that both of them are rustic women and not tutored witnesses 18 the occurrence had taken place injury on the neck of bani singh hence the overt act attributed to satbir singh namely attack on neck of bani injury on the neck of bani singh hence the overt act attributed to satbir singh namely attack on neck of bani years each and found them guilty for the offence under section 323 read with section 149 ipc and sentenced them each taken to the general hospital bhiwani for treatment 5 at 9 00 a m on the same day pw18 sub inspector
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTSubhransu Sekhar Padhi Vs. Gunamani SwaIn and ors.
Court : Supreme Court of India
Decided on : Aug-21-2014
the corporation to proceed against the surety even if some properties are mortgaged or hypothecated to it our view is further in section 31 of the act that its recourse to action under that section is without prejudice to the provisions of that it cannot withdraw or abandon the proceedings initiated under section 31 at any stage and then take recourse to the eventually the property was brought to sale by auction on 9 2 2009 where the appellant became the highest bidder for
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTUmakant and anr. Vs. State of Chhatisgarh
Court : Supreme Court of India
Decided on : Jul-01-2014
as per prosecution case is that anita jaiswal deceased was married to umakant appellant no 1 and after six months of 000 in dowry prohibition default additional ri for two months act 1961 under section 498 a ri for 3 years and ipc and sections 3 and 4 of the dowry prohibition act by the high court 26 accordingly this criminal appeal is the charges under section 498 a 304 b ipc and sections 3 amp 4 of the dowry prohibition act and convicted is completely erroneous misconceived and deserves to be set aside 9 on the contrary learned counsel for the state submitted that
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT