Market Value - Judgment Search Results

Asstt. Cit Vs. Marketeers

Court: Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Amritsar

Reported in: (2004)91TTJ(Asr.)708

been held that : "The addition of clause (baa) to the Explanation to section 80HHC of the Income Tax Act, 1961, is indicative of the legislative intent to exclude income on account of interest and rent, etc.

income Tax Officer Vs. Marketers

Court: Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Amritsar

Reported in: (2008)114TTJ(Asr.)887

previous year in which the said transfer takes place and for the purposes of Section 48, the fair market value of the asset on the date of such transfer shall be deemed to be the full value of

Agriculture Market Yard Hamalies Union Vs. Agriculture Market Committe ...

Court: Andhra Pradesh

Reported in: 2008(6)ALD88; 2009(1)ALT203

ORDERV. Eswaraiah, J.1. The petitioner, the Agricultural Market Yard Hamalies Union, questions the action of the Agricultural Market Committee, Yemmiganur of Kurnool District in adding two

D.S. Marketing Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Syrus Marketing and anr.

Court: Delhi

Reported in: II(2006)BC367; 128(2006)DLT60; 2006(86)DRJ779

same for recovery of a sum of Rs. 21,11,495/- with interest and costs against the defendants being Syrus Marketing (defendant No. 1) and Sunita Jamwal (defendant No. 2). The latter was sued in the capacity of being

Vishavkarma Motor Market Head Office Barnala Road Vs. Vishavkarma Moto ...

Court: Punjab and Haryana

THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. C.R.No.2706 of 2013 Date of Decision:30. 04.2013 Vishavkarma Motor Market, Head Office Barnala Road, Bathinda through its President Amarjit Singh ....Petitioner Versus Vishavkarma Motor Market, Barnala Road, Bathinda

Agriculture Produce Market Committee, through its Chairman Vs. The Hon ...

Court: Mumbai Nagpur

dated 02.06.2012. The respondent no.3 filed an appeal under provisions of Rule 104 of the Maharashtra Agricultural Produce Marketing (Development and Regulation) Rules, 1967 (for short, the said Rules). The Divisional Joint Registrar held that the respondent

Focus Combine Marketing Pvt Ltd vs.haryana State Cooperative Supply & ...

Court: Delhi

OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on:13. h SEPTEMBER, 2019 + FAO92019 and C.M. No.1042/2019 + FOCUS COMBINE MARKETING PVT LTD..... Appellant Through: Mr. Udit Gupta, Mr. Sidhant Bhatia and Mr. Aditya, Advocates versus HARYANA STATE COOPERATIVE

Karthikappally Taluk Marketing Co-Operative Soceity Ltd. vs the Kerala ...

Court: Kerala

HOUSE, MADAKKIMALA P.O., PARALIKKUNNU, WAYANAD DISTRICT 673122. BY ADV RINNY STEPHEN CHAMAPARAMPIL RESPONDENT/S: 1 THE KERALA STATE CO-OPERATIVE MARKETING FEDERATION LTD., REPRESENTED BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR, P. B.NO.2024, GANDHI NAGAR, KOCHI-682020. 2 THE STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED

Agricultural Produce Marketing Committee (Apmc) vs Taluka Agricultural ...

Court: Karnataka

HON'BLE MR.N.V.ANJARIA CHIEF JUSTICE AND THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE M.I.ARUN WRIT APPEAL NO. 1125/2024 (APMC) BETWEEN1. AGRICULTURAL PRODUCE MARKETING COMMITTEE (APMC), ARASIKERE-573 103 ... APPELLANT/S (BY SRI./SMT.: NANDA KISHORE , ADVOCATE) AND:1. TALUKA AGRICULTURAL PRODUCE MARKET CO-OPERATIVE

Agricultural Market Committee Rep. by Its Chairman, Sri Nanga Rajarath ...

Court: Andhra Pradesh

Reported in: 2008(3)ALD731; 2008(3)ALT115

the second respondent in his Letter No. S1 (3)5959/2005, dated 19-11-2007 in which the acts done by the Market Committee are declared as invalid, withdrawing the cheque power of Chairman as arbitrary, illegal and to pass such