Marbled - Judgment Search Results
Marbles Vs. Creecy
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided on: Nov-15-1909
Marbles v. Creecy - 215 U.S. 63 (1909) U.S. Supreme Court Marbles v. Creecy, 215 U.S. 63 (1909) Marbles
Gandy Vs. Marble
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided on: May-27-1887
Gandy v. Marble - 122 U.S. 432 (1887) U.S. Supreme Court Gandy v. Marble, 122 U.S. 432 (1887) Gandy v. Marble
D.S. Marbles Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Ajaya Marbles and Minerals and ors.
Court: Rajasthan
Decided on: Dec-19-2008
Reported in: AIR2009Raj62
ORDERPrakash Tatia, J.1. M/s. D.S. Marbles Pvt. Ltd., a Company registered under the Companies Act, 1956, having its registered office at National Highway No.
18-section briefs on any result in this list
Kedia Agglomerated Marbles Ltd. Vs. Collector of Central Excise
Court: Supreme Court of India
Decided on: Jan-14-2003
Reported in: AIR2003SC938; 2003(85)ECC485; 2003(152)ELT22(SC); JT2003(1)SC159; 2003(1)SCALE137; (2003)2SCC494; [2003]1SCR320
Dharmadhikari, J.1. The appellant M/s. Kedia Agglomerated Marbles Limited is engaged in manufacture of floor tiles which are marketed by them in the trade name 'Marbella
Aman Marble Industries Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Collector of C. Ex.
Court: Supreme Court of India
Decided on: Sep-18-2003
Reported in: 2003(90)ECC805; 2003LC4(SC); 2003(157)ELT393(SC); (2005)1SCC279
ORDER1. Question that arises for consideration in this appeal is one whether the cutting of marble blocks into marble slabs amounts to manufacture for the purpose of the Central Excise Act. The Tribunal by
Macson Marbles Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Union of India (Uoi)
Court: Supreme Court of India
Decided on: Nov-11-2003
Reported in: 2003LC810(SC); 2003(158)ELT424(SC)
ORDER1. An Industrial unit run by M/s. Diamond Marbles Pvt. Ltd. -respondent No. 4 was brought to sale in terms of Section 29 of the State Financial
Reetu Marbles Vs. Prabhakant Shukla
Court: Supreme Court of India
Decided on: Dec-03-2009
Reported in: AIR2010SC397; 2010(1)AWC12(SC); (2010)ILLJ305SC; 2009(14)SCALE308; (2010)2SCC70; 2010(1)LC67(SC):2009AIRSCW7614.
Review Application No. 172974/04.2. Briefly stated the relevant facts are that the appellant is carrying on business in marble and other allied products at Kanpur. The respondent was engaged by the appellant as an accountant. He served
Vividh Marbles Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Commercial Tax Officer
Court: Supreme Court of India
Decided on: Feb-23-2007
Reported in: JT2007(4)SC448; 2007(3)SCALE487; (2007)3SCC580; 2007AIRSCW5774
under sales tax Incentive/ Deferment Scheme 1987/1989 under PST and / or C.S.T. Act' on the sale of Marble Slabs.Hence a formal eligibility certificate as per law be granted to the said applicant. The application filled by
isha Marbles Vs. Bihar State Electricity Board and anr.
Court: Supreme Court of India
Decided on: Feb-03-1995
Reported in: I(1995)BC529(SC); JT1995(2)SC626; 1995(1)SCALE721; (1995)2SCC648; [1995]1SCR847
the Corporation Act)?Civil Appeal No. 1418 of 1995 (Arising out of SLP(C) No. 617 of 1992 (Mis Isha Marbles) :3. In this case, the appellant is a purchaser of the mortgaged assets of M/s. Patel Industries. Daltonganj
Chandra Marbles Vs. Ramachandran.C.H
Court: Kerala
Decided on: Jan-18-2013
THE 18TH DAY OF JANUARY 2013 28TH POUSHA 193 WP(C).No. 31097 of 2012 (K) -------------------------------------- PETITIONER: ------------------ CHANDRA MARBLES, MATTANNUR,KANNUR DISTRICT,PIN:670 702, REPRESENTED BY ITS PROPREITRESS C.M. JEENA,AGED 46 W/O CHNDRAN,RESIDING AT 'AKASH',NIDUVOTTUMKUNNU, THALASSERY ROAD,MATTANNUR,KANNUR DISTRICT PIN:670
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »
Hover bars for counts · drag or use +/− to zoom · click a bar to filter by year
AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free