Manufacturer - Judgment Search Results

Vikas Manufacturing Company Vs. Bharaj Manufacturing Company (Regd.) a ...

Court: Punjab and Haryana

Reported in: AIR1980P& H127

trade marks like MEMCO; EMCO were being manufactured by other manufacturers for a very long time and the respondent has not

Vikas Manufacturing Co. Vs. Bharat Manufacturing Co.

Court: Delhi

Reported in: 17(1980)DLT30

earlier he had come to know that the appellant was manufacturing and selling the locks under the trade mark in question.

Sanjeev Coke Manufacturing Company Vs. Bharat Coking Coal Limited and ...

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: AIR1983SC239; 1982(2)SCALE1193; (1983)1SCC147; [1983]1SCR1000

or in, a mine where the washing of coal or manufacture of coke is carried on ; We may also notice

NavIn Chemicals Manufacturing and Trading Co. (P.) Ltd. Vs. Commission ...

Court: Delhi

Reported in: (2003)179CTR(Del)216; [2003]259ITR111(Delhi)

D.K. Jain, J.1. These are three cross-references by the Revenue and the assessed. Since a common statement of the case...

The Calcutta Jute Manufacturing Company Ltd. and anr. Vs. Jute Manufac ...

Court: Kolkata

Reported in: 1998(59)ECC92

India and a portion thereof may be paid to Jute Manufacturers Development Council in terms of Jute Manufacturers Development Council Act,

Workmen of the Straw Board Manufacturing Co. Ltd. Vs. Straw Board Manu ...

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: AIR1974SC1132; [1974(28)FLR357]; 1974LabIC730; (1974)ILLJ499SC; (1974)4SCC681; [1974]3SCR703

as S. Mill and R. Mill respectively). Straw Board was manufactured in S. Mill and abrasive paper/cloth described as regmal was

Dxn Herbal Manufacturing (India) Vs. Income Tax Officer

Court: Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Chennai

Reported in: (2008)110ITD99(Chennai)

it was held that since the solution produced by the manufacturer could not be used as such without any further processing

The Ahmedabad Manufacturing and Vs. the Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court: Gujarat

Reported in: 1983LC1D(Gujarat)

large percentage of goods produced in a case where the manufacturer has also the selling organisation for sale directly to the

R.K. Manufacturers and ors. Vs. Minerals and Metals Trading Corporatio ...

Court: Chennai

Reported in: (1973)2MLJ389

motive behind the withdrawal of the concession to dairy equipment manufacturers etc. It is been revised because certain material was noticed

Alkali Manufacturers Vs. Sinochem International

Court: Monopolies and Restrictive Trade Practices Commission MRTPC

and fair value in an attempt to undercut the Indian manufacturers of soda ash. We answer the same in the affirmative