Manufactured - Judgment Search Results

Vikas Manufacturing Company Vs. Bharaj Manufacturing Company (Regd.) a ...

Court: Punjab and Haryana

Reported in: AIR1980P& H127

of the lock under the Designs Act, On account of the large and extensive scale of the locks manufactured by the respondent under the registered trade mark, design and label this registered mark had become popular and

Vikas Manufacturing Co. Vs. Bharat Manufacturing Co.

Court: Delhi

Reported in: 17(1980)DLT30

Harbans Lal, J.(1) Respondent is manufacturing locks under trade name Bemco and got this mark registered under Trade & Merchandise Marks Act in 1972

Sanjeev Coke Manufacturing Company Vs. Bharat Coking Coal Limited and ...

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: AIR1983SC239; 1982(2)SCALE1193; (1983)1SCC147; [1983]1SCR1000

by some baffling logic excludes things produced. If a car factory is a material resource, why not cars manufactured? 'Material' may cover everything worldly and 'resources', according to Random House Dictionary, takes in the collective wealth of

NavIn Chemicals Manufacturing and Trading Co. (P.) Ltd. Vs. Commission ...

Court: Delhi

Reported in: (2003)179CTR(Del)216; [2003]259ITR111(Delhi)

D.K. Jain, J.1. These are three cross-references by the Revenue and the assessed. Since a common statement of the case has been drawn up by the Income-tax Appellate Tribunal, Delhi Bench 'B' (for short 'the Tribunal'),...

Workmen of the Straw Board Manufacturing Co. Ltd. Vs. Straw Board Manu ...

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: AIR1974SC1132; [1974(28)FLR357]; 1974LabIC730; (1974)ILLJ499SC; (1974)4SCC681; [1974]3SCR703

Board Mill and the Regmal Mill (hereinafter described as S. Mill and R. Mill respectively). Straw Board was manufactured in S. Mill and abrasive paper/cloth described as regmal was prepared in R. Mill. These two Mills are

The Calcutta Jute Manufacturing Company Ltd. and anr. Vs. Jute Manufac ...

Court: Kolkata

Reported in: 1998(59)ECC92

long delay. The learned Counsel in support of his contention that yarn and twine are not two different manufactured products relied on Collector of Central Excise, Jaipur v. Banswara Syntex Ltd., reported in : 1996(88)ELT645(SC) and Union

State of Madhya Pradesh and Others, M/S. Birla Jute Manufacturing Co. ...

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: AIR1996SC167; JT1995(4)SC572; 1995(3)SCALE729; (1995)4SCC603; [1995]Supp1SCR271; 1995(2)LC392(SC)

could be stated thus :M/s. Birla Ltd., has set up several industries all over the country for the manufacture and sale of consumable goods. One of such industries set up by M/s. Birla Ltd. is M/s. Satna

Commissioner of Income-tax, Bombay City Vs. the Century Spinning and M ...

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: AIR1953SC501; (1954)56BOMLR742; [1953]23CompCas462(SC); [1953]24ITR499(SC); [1954]1SCR203

Ghulam Hasan, J.1. These two connected appeals, one by the commissioner of Income-tax, Bombay, and the other by the Century Spinning ., arise out of the judgment and order of the Bombay High Court delivered on...

M/S. Armstrong Desing Acmite India Manufacturing Private Limited vs Ar ...

Court: Karnataka

THE HON'BLE MRS JUSTICE K.S. HEMALEKHA WRIT PETITION NO.11959 OF 2023 (L-RES) BETWEEN: M/S. ARMSTRONG DESIGN ACMITE INDIA MANUFACTURING PRIVATE LIMITED, NO.42-B, 2ND PHASE, PEENYA INDUSTRIAL ESTATE, BENGALURU - 560 058 REPRESENTED BY ITS CHIEF MANAGER, MR.

Godrej and Boyce Manufacturing Company Limited a Company Incorporated ...

Court: Mumbai

Reported in: 2007(6)BomCR872; (2007)2LLJ872Bom

D.Y. Chandrachud, J.1. On a reference to adjudication under Section 10 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 the Labour Court, by its Part I award dated 25th September, 2003 held that the disciplinary enquiry was fair...