Manner - Judgment Search Results

Manners Vs. Morosco

Court: US Supreme Court

Manners v. Morosco - 252 U.S. 317 (1920) U.S. Supreme Court Manners v. Morosco, 252 U.S. 317 (1920) Manners

Palakdhari Rai Vs. Manners and ors.

Court: Kolkata

Reported in: (1896)ILR23Cal179

in respect of such rights 'it shall, subject to any custom to the contrary, descend in the same manner as other immoveable property.' Section 183 has an important bearing on the right of transfer. It declares that

Bharatiya Kamgar Sena Vs. Geoffrey Manners and Co. Ltd.

Court: Mumbai

Reported in: [1992]73CompCas122(Bom); [1991(63)FLR435]

arises upon an order sanctioning, under section 391 of the Companies Act, the scheme of amalgamation between Geoffrey Manners and Co. Ltd. (GM) and John Wyeth (India) Ltd. (JWIL) with some modification. The scheme proposes to transfer

Commissioner of Income-tax Vs. Geoffrey Manners and Co. Ltd.

Court: Mumbai

Reported in: (1993)113CTR(Bom)149; [1993]204ITR483(Bom)

part of the amount standing to the credit of the general reserves, the capital, as computed in the manner provided by rule 1 of the said Second Schedule, is not increased in any manner whatsoever. The ratio

Geoffrey Manners and Co. Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Income Tax

Court: Mumbai

Reported in: (1996)136CTR(Bom)169; [1996]221ITR695(Bom)

perquisite in respect of the use of the cars by the directors. On valuing the perquisites in the manner laid down in the said rule, he found that the value of the perquisites was less than the

Geoffrey Manners and Co. Ltd. Vs. Harbhajan Singh Munjral and anr.

Court: Delhi

Reported in: 26(1984)DLT404; 1985(8)DRJ97

25-B of Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958 (hereinafter referred to as the 'Act') on behalf of M/s. Geoffrey Manners & Co. Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as 'the tenant') against the order of Rent Controller, Delhi, dated 4th

Geoffrey Manners and Co. Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai

Reported in: (2000)(69)ECC653

1. When this case was called out, the appellants were not present in spite of notice. On the last two occasions also they were not present or represented. We therefore proceed to decide this issue on...

Geoffrey Manners and Co. Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise,

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai

Reported in: (2001)(138)ELT1418Tri(Mum.)bai

1. Applicant manufactures as a job worker tootpaste which it supplies to Smith kline Beecham Asia Pvt. Ltd. The value for assessment of such toothpaste is to be derived from its retail price as provided in...

Herbert Manners and ors. Vs. Chatter Mahto and ors.

Court: Kolkata

Reported in: 4Ind.Cas.531

2nd party will undoubtedly get rid of the plaintiffs.9. Further the learned Counsel contends that his client Mr. Manners has been prejudiced by the course which the Subordinate Judge has adopted in requiring the defendants 1st party

F. Hoffmann-la Roche and Co. Ltd. Vs. Geoffrey Manner and Co. Pvt. Ltd ...

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: AIR1970SC2062; (1971)73BOMLR119; (1969)2SCC716; [1970]2SCR213

respect of the same goods or descriptive of goods.Section 56(1) reads : On application made in the prescribed manner to a High Court or to the Registrar by any person aggrieved, the tribunal may make such order