- Run a keyword search first to load the results page.
- Select Supreme Court, a High Court, or tribunal on the left.
- Optionally filter by decision year to focus on recent or historical cases.
Manner - Judgment Search Results
Manners Vs. Morosco
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided on: Mar-22-1920
Manners v. Morosco - 252 U.S. 317 (1920) U.S. Supreme Court
Palakdhari Rai Vs. Manners and ors.
Court: Kolkata
Decided on: Sep-03-1895
Reported in: (1896)ILR23Cal179
to any custom to the contrary, descend in the same manner as other immoveable property.' Section 183 has an important bearing
Bharatiya Kamgar Sena Vs. Geoffrey Manners and Co. Ltd.
Court: Mumbai
Decided on: Aug-22-1991
Reported in: [1992]73CompCas122(Bom); [1991(63)FLR435]
of the Companies Act, the scheme of amalgamation between Geoffrey Manners and Co. Ltd. (GM) and John Wyeth (India) Ltd. (JWIL)
Commissioner of Income-tax Vs. Geoffrey Manners and Co. Ltd.
Court: Mumbai
Decided on: Mar-01-1993
Reported in: (1993)113CTR(Bom)149; [1993]204ITR483(Bom)
of the general reserves, the capital, as computed in the manner provided by rule 1 of the said Second Schedule, is
Geoffrey Manners and Co. Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Income Tax
Court: Mumbai
Decided on: Dec-14-1995
Reported in: (1996)136CTR(Bom)169; [1996]221ITR695(Bom)
cars by the directors. On valuing the perquisites in the manner laid down in the said rule, he found that the
Geoffrey Manners and Co. Ltd. Vs. Harbhajan Singh Munjral and anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-17-1984
Reported in: 26(1984)DLT404; 1985(8)DRJ97
referred to as the 'Act') on behalf of M/s. Geoffrey Manners & Co. Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as 'the tenant') against
Geoffrey Manners and Co. Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise
Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai
Decided on: Apr-03-2000
Reported in: (2000)(69)ECC653
1. When this case was called out, the appellants were not present in spite of notice. On the last two...
Geoffrey Manners and Co. Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise,
Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai
Decided on: Mar-21-2001
Reported in: (2001)(138)ELT1418Tri(Mum.)bai
1. Applicant manufactures as a job worker tootpaste which it supplies to Smith kline Beecham Asia Pvt. Ltd. The value...
Herbert Manners and ors. Vs. Chatter Mahto and ors.
Court: Kolkata
Decided on: May-22-1907
Reported in: 4Ind.Cas.531
plaintiffs.9. Further the learned Counsel contends that his client Mr. Manners has been prejudiced by the course which the Subordinate Judge
F. Hoffmann-la Roche and Co. Ltd. Vs. Geoffrey Manner and Co. Pvt. Ltd ...
Court: Supreme Court of India
Decided on: Sep-08-1969
Reported in: AIR1970SC2062; (1971)73BOMLR119; (1969)2SCC716; [1970]2SCR213
goods.Section 56(1) reads : On application made in the prescribed manner to a High Court or to the Registrar by any
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- Next ›
- Last »