Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: manipur municipalities act 1994 section 155 supply of drinking water Page 1 of about 234 results (0.115 seconds)

N. Tolpishak and ors. Vs. State of Manipur and ors.

Court : Guwahati

..... in their shops. in order to substantiate his submissions, the learned counsel appearing for the petitioners has drawn the attention of this court to different provisions of the manipur municipalities act, 1994. chapter-xi of the manipur municipalities act, 1994 deals with the markets and slaughter houses and also the requirements of taking license for certain purposes. he refers to sections 164, 165, 166, 167 and 168 of ..... annexures-a/1 (colly), it is clear that the petitioners have taken their shops on lease from the private land owners and not from the imphal municipal council. from the conjoined reading of chapter-xi of the manipur municipalities act, 1994 which consists of sections 162, 163, 164, 165, 166, 167, 168, 169, 170, 171, 172, 173, 174, 175, 176, 177, 178 and 179 and .....

ingudam Lukhoi Singh and anr. Vs. Ingudam Tomba Singh and ors.

Court : Guwahati

..... these witnesses from the defence side. learned additional district judge further held that in the facts and circumstances, the suit is not hit by section 196 of the manipur municipalities act, 1976 for want of notice. learned additional district judge set aside the impugned judgment and decree passed by the learned munsiff and decreed plaintiffs suit by his ..... the facts and circumstances of the instant case, it cannot be held that the suit was not maintainable for want of notice to the imphal municipality under section 196 of the manipur municipalities act, 1976, and hence this substantial question of law formulated by this court has to be answered in the negative. although in the plaint it was ..... recording the name of late chaoba singh only in respect of the shop, the suit is barred for want of notice under section 196 of the manipur municipalities act, 1976. on the pleadings of the parties, the following issues were framed: - 1. whether the plaintiff and the defendant nos. 1 to 8 are the .....

ingudam Lukhoi Singh and anr. Vs. Ingudam Tomba Singh and ors.

Court : Guwahati

..... these witnesses from the defence side. learned additional district judge further held that in the facts and circumstances, the suit is not hit by section 196 of the manipur municipalities act, 1976 for want of notice. learned additional district judge set aside the impugned judgment and decree passed by the learned munsiff and decreed plaintiffs suit by his ..... in the facts and circumstances of the instant case, it cannot be held that the suit was not maintainable for want of notice to the imphal municipality under section 196 of the manipur municipalities act, 1976, and hence this substantial question of law formulated by this court has to be answered in the negative. although in the plaint it was ..... recording the name of late chaoba singh only in respect of the shop, the suit is barred for want of notice under section 196 of the manipur municipalities act, 1976. on the pleadings of the parties, the following issues were framed: -1. whether the plaintiff and the defendant nos. 1 to 8 are the .....

Y. Budha Singh and ors. Vs. State of Manipur and ors.

Court : Guwahati

..... deputy commissioner, imphal west has been intimated that the government has decided to postpone the meeting to elect a new chairperson and vice-chairperson under section 221 of the manipur municipalities act, 1994 (for short 'the act'). aggrieved, the petitioner have moved this court in the present writ petition for appropriate relief.3. mr. kotiswar singh, learned counsel for the petitioners, submitted that under the ..... , postponing the meeting for election of new chairperson and vice-chairperson of imphal municipal council under section 221 of the manipur municipalities act, 1994 is quashed, consequently, the impugned notification dated 19.5.1999 issued by the executive officer, imphal municipal council pursuant to the impugned letter dated 18.5.1999 of the govt. of manipur secretariat mahud department is also quashed. the councillors of the imphal .....

President, Municipal Board Shahjahanpur, Through Bishan Chandra Vs. Di ...

Court : Allahabad

Reported in : AIR1956All369

..... regulate the conduct, of the meeting.the standing counsel has not been 'able to point out any other provision in the municipalities act which authorises a district magistrate to pass such an order. in my judgment, therefore, the order of the district magistrate of 7-4-.1955 was wholly ..... that the president wrongly recorded the minutes of the proceedings of the meetings, the state government may have power to deal with the situation under section 48, municipalities act by taking steps against the president but the district magistrate had no authority under section 34, on the complaint being made by some of the members, to ..... there is no dispute so far as the essential facts of the case are concerned between the parties. the main controversy, therefore, is whether section 34, municipalities act applies to the present circumstances and the order passed by the district magistrate was within his competence.there is, as i have already said, a slight controversy between .....

Bhagwandas Ramcharandas Vs. President, Municipal Committee, Achalpur C ...

Court : Mumbai

Reported in : AIR1967Bom143; (1966)68BOMLR721; ILR1966Bom902

..... fifty rupees. it is not even stated that it was an oral contract. we do not see, therefore, how any action under section 22 (2) of the municipalities act could have been taken against the petitioner even assuming that he were shown to be the owner of the property or to have entered into a contract in 1961. however ..... passed by the respondent no. 2 on this application also, it does not appear that the powers and duties enjoined on the authority under section 22 (2) of the municipalities act, have been properly apprehended by the respondent no. 2. there was no question of rejecting the application of the petitioner, as if it was an appeal against the ..... able to see, there does not appear to be any contract in writing in respect of this lease. section 44 of the municipalities act requires contracts to be in writing in respect of affairs of the municipal committee, except for those of sales or purchases of moveable and contracts of service with servants. under the second proviso to sub-section .....

Ramesh Mehta Vs. Sanwal Chand Singhvi and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : AIR2004SC2258; JT2004(Suppl1)SC275; RLW2004(2)SC269; 2004(5)SCALE27; (2004)5SCC409; 2004(2)LC1307(SC)

..... appears from the definition; is the question.26. it is accepted that the rules have not been altered despite the fact that amendments have been carried out in the municipalities act in the year 1994. all members who were not elected members under the unamended provisions were treated as elected members. their rights were at par with them. the very fact that the ..... of elected members'.6. before adverting to the arguments advanced on both sides, we reproduce hereinbelow the relevant provisions of the said act (pre and post 1994):- a comparative chart showing the provisionsof the rajasthan municipalities act, 1959before and after the amendment in 1994:--provisions prior to amendmentprovisions after amendment'9. composition of boards. - (1)subject to the provisions contained in the succeeding sub-sections .....

Sultan and Another Vs. Shahajaha and Others

Court : Karnataka Kalaburagi

..... of ramesh mehta (supra), the hon'ble apex court has taken cognizance of the provisions of section 9 of the rajasthan municipalities act as it stood prior to the amendment carried out in the year 1994 and thereafter the provisions of section 9 is referred to in paragraph 5 at page 416 of the judgment which is reproduced ..... the amendment, members were at par with the elected members. after the 1994 amendment, only elected members and mlas have the right to voter as per section 9(1) of the rajasthan municipalities act. elected mlas and mps represent a larger area and the area of municipal council comes within that larger area. 49. in the case of national ..... meetings of the corporation or standing committee was removed by act no.36/94 which came into effect from 1.6.1994 and therefore, a reasonable inference is that elected mlas have been conferred with the right to vote. 24. putting section 7 of the karnataka municipalities act in juxtaposition with the earlier section 9, the division bench .....

Smt. Mahendri Chhabra and ors. Vs. State of U.P. and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Reported in : 2003(3)AWC2556; (2003)2UPLBEC1361

..... the facts of the present case, we have no hesitation to hold that even after the deletion of the proviso to section 9 of the u.p. municipalities act, by u.p. act no. 19 of 1994, a nominated member of the nagar palika parishad can be removed by the state government by exercising the power under sections 16 and 21 of the general ..... issued only to fill up the lacuna, which is not permissible under law. according to him under section 9 of the municipalities act, 1916, after its amendment by u.p. act no. 12 of 1994 by which the proviso added by u.p. act no. 19 of 1990 w.e.f. 15.2.1990, which provided that a member nominated under this section shall hold ..... as holding of office on the pleasure of the state government has been done away by the state legislature by u.p. act no. 12 of 1994. he submitted that from a reading of section 10a and section 38 of the municipalities act, 1916, the term of the nominated members is coextensive with the term of the nagar palika parishad and the term of .....

Prem Raj Bohra and Etc. Vs. Jairoopa and ors. Etc.

Court : Rajasthan

Reported in : AIR2003Raj128; 2003(1)WLC495; 2003(2)WLN383

..... ) of the section 61. it is also submitted that first meeting of the board has not been defined in rajasthan municipalities act but it is defined in rule 96 of the rajasthan municipalities (election) rules 1994. rule 96 says that first meeting of the board shall be the meeting, which is conveyed to elect the chairperson ..... supra) is clearly distinguishable and the point of distinction is contained in the relevant statutory provisions of the u.p. municipalities act and the rajasthan municipalities act. under the u.p. act, the chairman/president of the municipality is elected directly by the electorate on the basis of adult franchise exercised by voters of the area. section 43 ..... rules, which uses the expression whole number of members' and the definition of 'whole member of members' contained in section 3(36) of the rajasthan municipalities act, 1959, defining whole number means total number of votes at a time, therefore, are clearly ultra vires the provisions contained in article 243-r of the .....